Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Faircrest Heights, Los Angeles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crenshaw ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:31, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Do you have any reason to think that this is a real place? It seems that it has a neighborhood association, founded in 2005, which is not recognized by the city, and that it's been mentioned once in the LA times and once in the Jewish Journal of Greater L.A., both right around the time the neighborhood association was founded. I'm just wondering if I'm missing something. I'm thinking seriously about sending it to AfD if I'm not missing anything. Thanks.— alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 00:31, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- Put a
WP:Prod on it and see if anybody objects. It's easier.
GeorgeLouis (
talk) 00:59, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- I guess so. I found another marginal source, which is a KCET blog about South Robertson that has a little photo spread on it, but the blog post was funded by the South Robertson Neighborhood Council, so it doesn't really count, but it might be enough to force it to AfD. Anyway, I was just thinking it'd be nicer to see if there's anything I missed before I do one or the other.—
alf laylah wa laylah (
talk) 01:20, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- I nominated it for deletion. No claim to notability. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 02:36, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- I guess so. I found another marginal source, which is a KCET blog about South Robertson that has a little photo spread on it, but the blog post was funded by the South Robertson Neighborhood Council, so it doesn't really count, but it might be enough to force it to AfD. Anyway, I was just thinking it'd be nicer to see if there's anything I missed before I do one or the other.—
alf laylah wa laylah (
talk) 01:20, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Redondo Sycamore, Los Angeles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Redondo Sycamore, Los Angeles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redondo Sycamore, Los Angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 00:51, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Reynier Village, Los Angeles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reynier Village, Los Angeles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reynier Village, Los Angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 02:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
Carthay, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. Thank you. Both of the small areas you added went to the same page on
Carthay.
GeorgeLouis (
talk) 07:28, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Recently you made a series of changes to some of the Los Angeles neighborhood articles, citing the zipmap.net website. Can you let us know why you think this site is a WP:Reliable source? Thanks. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 04:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Well, this site shows a boundary map of the Pico-Robertson neighborhood. Just click on a number next to the zipmap.net on any of the articles and it will show you. (
talk) 09:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. The question actually was, to paraphrase, "What makes you think this site is a
WP:Reliable source?" Specifically, some of the boundaries seem to be at odds with those plotted by the
Los Angeles Times, which is a reliable source. How do you propose to handle the differences? My idea would be to adopt the L.A. Times boundaries, but if you don't want to do that, then to omit the street boundaries altogether and just refer to adjoining neighborhoods in a general way. If we put all the conflicting street boundaries into each neighborhood article, they are going to get rather long and confusing. Yours,
GeorgeLouis (
talk) 06:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Another way is to use a separate paragraph to point out the conflicting boundaries, instead of weaving them into an existing paragraph. What do you think? 12:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. The question actually was, to paraphrase, "What makes you think this site is a
WP:Reliable source?" Specifically, some of the boundaries seem to be at odds with those plotted by the
Los Angeles Times, which is a reliable source. How do you propose to handle the differences? My idea would be to adopt the L.A. Times boundaries, but if you don't want to do that, then to omit the street boundaries altogether and just refer to adjoining neighborhoods in a general way. If we put all the conflicting street boundaries into each neighborhood article, they are going to get rather long and confusing. Yours,
GeorgeLouis (
talk) 06:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reynier Village, Los Angeles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westside ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:17, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of La Cienega Heights, Los Angeles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article La Cienega Heights, Los Angeles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Cienega Heights, Los Angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 03:36, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
It appears that something in your system is automatically inserting junk code into articles, such as in your edit here. I'm sure you've encountered an edit filter informing you of this. Could you tell me what operating system and browser (along with any browser extensions) you use, so I can help you diagnose the problem? Regards, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:45, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Pico Park, Los Angeles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pico Park, Los Angeles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pico Park, Los Angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 15:58, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Wilshire Highlands, Los Angeles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wilshire Highlands, Los Angeles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilshire Highlands, Los Angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 04:25, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Wilshire Vista, Los Angeles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wilshire Vista, Los Angeles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilshire Vista, Los Angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 05:06, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Wilshire Vista Heights, Los Angeles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wilshire Vista Heights, Los Angeles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilshire Vista Heights, Los Angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 05:11, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
FYI . . . Disneyland is not in the City or County of Los Angeles. Thanks, Bahooka ( talk) 03:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Danica McKellar. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you.
TJRC (
talk) 18:11, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to
Crystal McKellar, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Note, I realize this is before you've had a chance to react to the warning on the edits to
Danica McKellar, above, but need to note two distinct problems: both changing info so that it is contrary to factual cited material (D McK); and changing/adding information without any source (both D McK & C McK).
TJRC (
talk) 18:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: Looking at the warnings above, both from me and Bahooka, and number of your edits being reverted by other editors for being unsupported and/or erroneous, I am reverting any recent edits you have made that have not included supporting citations. I assume these are good-faith errors, but it appears that you are making these edits without the careful regard for correctness and verifiability that Wikipedia requires. TJRC ( talk) 18:21, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Wilsonandrewc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Wilsonandrewc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
You recently created a page for Crestview, Los Angeles. However, you have provided no citations or references of any kind. I suspect your page will be nominated for deletion unless you add something - anything - that indicates that this neighborhood actually exists outside of your own opinion.
Additionally, you re-created a page for the deleted neighborhood of La Cienega Heights, Los Angeles. But again, you have provided no further citations or references from beyond when this page was last deleted. I personally know that this particular neighborhood has city installed signage, but you have not even documented that much with a photo of the sign. That would be a begining. With no further work on your part, I suspect this page will be deleted again. Phatblackmama ( talk) 17:32, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Wilsonandrewc, thanks for creating La Cienega Heights, Los Angeles!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn ( talk) 07:58, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Wilsonandrewc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Faircrest Heights, Los Angeles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crenshaw ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:31, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Do you have any reason to think that this is a real place? It seems that it has a neighborhood association, founded in 2005, which is not recognized by the city, and that it's been mentioned once in the LA times and once in the Jewish Journal of Greater L.A., both right around the time the neighborhood association was founded. I'm just wondering if I'm missing something. I'm thinking seriously about sending it to AfD if I'm not missing anything. Thanks.— alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 00:31, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- Put a
WP:Prod on it and see if anybody objects. It's easier.
GeorgeLouis (
talk) 00:59, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- I guess so. I found another marginal source, which is a KCET blog about South Robertson that has a little photo spread on it, but the blog post was funded by the South Robertson Neighborhood Council, so it doesn't really count, but it might be enough to force it to AfD. Anyway, I was just thinking it'd be nicer to see if there's anything I missed before I do one or the other.—
alf laylah wa laylah (
talk) 01:20, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- I nominated it for deletion. No claim to notability. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 02:36, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- I guess so. I found another marginal source, which is a KCET blog about South Robertson that has a little photo spread on it, but the blog post was funded by the South Robertson Neighborhood Council, so it doesn't really count, but it might be enough to force it to AfD. Anyway, I was just thinking it'd be nicer to see if there's anything I missed before I do one or the other.—
alf laylah wa laylah (
talk) 01:20, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Redondo Sycamore, Los Angeles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Redondo Sycamore, Los Angeles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redondo Sycamore, Los Angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 00:51, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Reynier Village, Los Angeles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reynier Village, Los Angeles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reynier Village, Los Angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 02:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
Carthay, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. Thank you. Both of the small areas you added went to the same page on
Carthay.
GeorgeLouis (
talk) 07:28, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Recently you made a series of changes to some of the Los Angeles neighborhood articles, citing the zipmap.net website. Can you let us know why you think this site is a WP:Reliable source? Thanks. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 04:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Well, this site shows a boundary map of the Pico-Robertson neighborhood. Just click on a number next to the zipmap.net on any of the articles and it will show you. (
talk) 09:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. The question actually was, to paraphrase, "What makes you think this site is a
WP:Reliable source?" Specifically, some of the boundaries seem to be at odds with those plotted by the
Los Angeles Times, which is a reliable source. How do you propose to handle the differences? My idea would be to adopt the L.A. Times boundaries, but if you don't want to do that, then to omit the street boundaries altogether and just refer to adjoining neighborhoods in a general way. If we put all the conflicting street boundaries into each neighborhood article, they are going to get rather long and confusing. Yours,
GeorgeLouis (
talk) 06:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Another way is to use a separate paragraph to point out the conflicting boundaries, instead of weaving them into an existing paragraph. What do you think? 12:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. The question actually was, to paraphrase, "What makes you think this site is a
WP:Reliable source?" Specifically, some of the boundaries seem to be at odds with those plotted by the
Los Angeles Times, which is a reliable source. How do you propose to handle the differences? My idea would be to adopt the L.A. Times boundaries, but if you don't want to do that, then to omit the street boundaries altogether and just refer to adjoining neighborhoods in a general way. If we put all the conflicting street boundaries into each neighborhood article, they are going to get rather long and confusing. Yours,
GeorgeLouis (
talk) 06:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reynier Village, Los Angeles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westside ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:17, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of La Cienega Heights, Los Angeles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article La Cienega Heights, Los Angeles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Cienega Heights, Los Angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 03:36, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
It appears that something in your system is automatically inserting junk code into articles, such as in your edit here. I'm sure you've encountered an edit filter informing you of this. Could you tell me what operating system and browser (along with any browser extensions) you use, so I can help you diagnose the problem? Regards, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:45, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Pico Park, Los Angeles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pico Park, Los Angeles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pico Park, Los Angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 15:58, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Wilshire Highlands, Los Angeles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wilshire Highlands, Los Angeles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilshire Highlands, Los Angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 04:25, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Wilshire Vista, Los Angeles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wilshire Vista, Los Angeles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilshire Vista, Los Angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 05:06, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Wilshire Vista Heights, Los Angeles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wilshire Vista Heights, Los Angeles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilshire Vista Heights, Los Angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 05:11, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
FYI . . . Disneyland is not in the City or County of Los Angeles. Thanks, Bahooka ( talk) 03:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Danica McKellar. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you.
TJRC (
talk) 18:11, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to
Crystal McKellar, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Note, I realize this is before you've had a chance to react to the warning on the edits to
Danica McKellar, above, but need to note two distinct problems: both changing info so that it is contrary to factual cited material (D McK); and changing/adding information without any source (both D McK & C McK).
TJRC (
talk) 18:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: Looking at the warnings above, both from me and Bahooka, and number of your edits being reverted by other editors for being unsupported and/or erroneous, I am reverting any recent edits you have made that have not included supporting citations. I assume these are good-faith errors, but it appears that you are making these edits without the careful regard for correctness and verifiability that Wikipedia requires. TJRC ( talk) 18:21, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Wilsonandrewc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Wilsonandrewc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
You recently created a page for Crestview, Los Angeles. However, you have provided no citations or references of any kind. I suspect your page will be nominated for deletion unless you add something - anything - that indicates that this neighborhood actually exists outside of your own opinion.
Additionally, you re-created a page for the deleted neighborhood of La Cienega Heights, Los Angeles. But again, you have provided no further citations or references from beyond when this page was last deleted. I personally know that this particular neighborhood has city installed signage, but you have not even documented that much with a photo of the sign. That would be a begining. With no further work on your part, I suspect this page will be deleted again. Phatblackmama ( talk) 17:32, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Wilsonandrewc, thanks for creating La Cienega Heights, Los Angeles!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn ( talk) 07:58, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Wilsonandrewc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |