Hello, WilliamBerry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 21:31, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! WilliamBerry,
you are invited to the
Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
Nicnote •
ask me a question •
contributions
21:31, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
|
The article Reptilicant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Except for the Cannes film market fest guide which is neither?
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Velella
Velella Talk
22:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Bikini Hotel has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Bikini Hotel was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mu-02GfMw5o) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
media file (e.g. a
sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's
copyright policy, as well as other parts of our
external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our
upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
00:36, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Bikini Hotel, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Please do not remove tags that have not been fixed and add any information that cannot be fully cited. Thank you. Please do not hesitate to ask me if you have any questions.
Nicnote •
ask me a question •
contributions
01:33, 23 August 2016 (UTC) Thats not true! I added references, did a rewrite and somebody else also added references. After that you reverted the page to its previous problematic rough draft.I did not remove prior to this.
Ummm. Nicnote. Please stop being condescending. It was removed because the rewrites were done and references added. Per the template it said remove. Your remarks dont appear constructive. Nor does your criticism.Moreover- this film are far more notable than many on this site. Why dont you actually BE constructive and add to it?
Hello WilliamBerry, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to
Reptilicant has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without
permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 03:29, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tina-Desiree Berg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina-Desiree Berg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marvellous Spider-Man 08:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the
userpage of another user may be considered
vandalism. Specifically, your edit to
User:Marvellous Spider-Man may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to
Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you.
Class455 (
talk)
15:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
He deleted an article that was of a notable person without cause- as it was fully cited and wont respond on the page. When I tried to address it- I got "what part of closed do you not understand". So- tell me why that is proper etiquette? Is that polite?
Sir, I suggest that you decide if you are going to sufficiently comply by the rules here to avoid being blocked. This includes basics like using four tildes to sign your talk-page posts, "~~~~". If you can't be patient with people who are here with agendas and personal problems, you need to either move on or figure out how to influence Wikipedia from the outside. You will hear that Wikipedia is not therapy, but that doesn't mean that a view to improving the lives of those here is a bad idea. Respectfully, Unscintillating ( talk) 00:17, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Sir- they can go ahead and block. This site should be about veracity and its clearly not.
I mean really? People with agendas and personal problems should be allowed to do whatever? That completely makes this site void of truth- or anything else it aspires too. And the page remains deleted. Sad.
The article Magma: Earth's Molten Core has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFILM
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Rogermx (
talk)
14:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, WilliamBerry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 21:31, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! WilliamBerry,
you are invited to the
Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
Nicnote •
ask me a question •
contributions
21:31, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
|
The article Reptilicant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Except for the Cannes film market fest guide which is neither?
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Velella
Velella Talk
22:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Bikini Hotel has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Bikini Hotel was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mu-02GfMw5o) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
media file (e.g. a
sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's
copyright policy, as well as other parts of our
external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our
upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
00:36, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Bikini Hotel, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Please do not remove tags that have not been fixed and add any information that cannot be fully cited. Thank you. Please do not hesitate to ask me if you have any questions.
Nicnote •
ask me a question •
contributions
01:33, 23 August 2016 (UTC) Thats not true! I added references, did a rewrite and somebody else also added references. After that you reverted the page to its previous problematic rough draft.I did not remove prior to this.
Ummm. Nicnote. Please stop being condescending. It was removed because the rewrites were done and references added. Per the template it said remove. Your remarks dont appear constructive. Nor does your criticism.Moreover- this film are far more notable than many on this site. Why dont you actually BE constructive and add to it?
Hello WilliamBerry, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to
Reptilicant has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without
permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 03:29, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tina-Desiree Berg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina-Desiree Berg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marvellous Spider-Man 08:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the
userpage of another user may be considered
vandalism. Specifically, your edit to
User:Marvellous Spider-Man may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to
Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you.
Class455 (
talk)
15:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
He deleted an article that was of a notable person without cause- as it was fully cited and wont respond on the page. When I tried to address it- I got "what part of closed do you not understand". So- tell me why that is proper etiquette? Is that polite?
Sir, I suggest that you decide if you are going to sufficiently comply by the rules here to avoid being blocked. This includes basics like using four tildes to sign your talk-page posts, "~~~~". If you can't be patient with people who are here with agendas and personal problems, you need to either move on or figure out how to influence Wikipedia from the outside. You will hear that Wikipedia is not therapy, but that doesn't mean that a view to improving the lives of those here is a bad idea. Respectfully, Unscintillating ( talk) 00:17, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Sir- they can go ahead and block. This site should be about veracity and its clearly not.
I mean really? People with agendas and personal problems should be allowed to do whatever? That completely makes this site void of truth- or anything else it aspires too. And the page remains deleted. Sad.
The article Magma: Earth's Molten Core has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFILM
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Rogermx (
talk)
14:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)