|
In future, you could always be bold and make the change yourself :). ck lostsword• T• C 19:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Characters in The Belgariad. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lra drama 20:59, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
If you feel there is no point in them being there, by all means get rid of them. However, it may just be best to inform other users of what you are doing on the article's talkpage (i.e. click on the discussion tab). I think it's best to do it like that. :-) Lra drama 08:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Wild ste, I understand where you are coming from; however, whether there is one poor article or one hundred, it doesn't change what standard is considered to be appropriate for Wikipedia. If you are interested in improving the article, please do. Thanks. D4g0thur 10:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
|
In future, you could always be bold and make the change yourself :). ck lostsword• T• C 19:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Characters in The Belgariad. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lra drama 20:59, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
If you feel there is no point in them being there, by all means get rid of them. However, it may just be best to inform other users of what you are doing on the article's talkpage (i.e. click on the discussion tab). I think it's best to do it like that. :-) Lra drama 08:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Wild ste, I understand where you are coming from; however, whether there is one poor article or one hundred, it doesn't change what standard is considered to be appropriate for Wikipedia. If you are interested in improving the article, please do. Thanks. D4g0thur 10:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)