This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:33, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your attempt to keep the article sane and based on reliable sources. Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 15:18, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and sourced everything that you contested as unsourced. Feel free to drop me a note if you see errors or omissions. Providing encyclopedic coverage of such a controversial topic is indeed a delicate BLP balance, isn't it? Jclemens ( talk) 00:01, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
I suggest you stop moving the edit war you are involved in to new language versions all the time. Discuss things on one language version (why not here on enwp?) and then move on to other language versions. GameOn ( talk) 08:32, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, regarding some of your recent comments at the RfD, I gently suggest that you leave out (and even go back and strike) your thoughts regarding other editors' motivations. See WP:Etiquette - there are various procedures for handling difficult situations with other editors (e.g. WP:WQA, WP:DDE, WP:DR), but until that point it's best to stick to policy; don't give others the ability to bring action against you. Best, AV3000 ( talk) 14:09, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
sorry, I said talk page but meant discussion page
All the best
Boynamedsue ( talk) 18:33, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
a strange question in deed. a simple answer: why should u see me on other language wikis, anyways? i don't know, since i don't see any point on wasting my time there. goodone ( talk) 14:31, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
As the article is a redirect from National Socialism and there is NO separate article thereon, it is clear that referring to National Socialism and making it extremely clear that the reference is not about Nazism must belong properly in some article, and this is "the only game in town". Please self-revert the Nazism revert you made, or show me what article it belongs in -- noting that there is NO "National Socialism" article. Cheers. Collect ( talk) 17:41, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
What about this as a sexual orientation? You want to support its inclusion at the Sexual orientation article? Homosexuals and zoosexuals, in the same boat. You can come in and comment on the talk page. 120.203.215.11 ( talk) 01:17, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
ne verujem...frapirao sam se kad sam video da si ti predlozio brisanje clanka potpisani...nije te mrzelo da trazis clanak po engleskoj vikipediji i od milion stranih korisnika i urednika ti budes bas taj koji ce predloziti brisanje clanka o srpskoj seriji na engleskom vikiju??? ...ej, srbine, srbine... najgori smo...sad razumem izreku ko ce kome ako ne svoj svome...i treba da izumremo i medjusobno se istebimo kad smo ovakvi...lepo je patrijarh Pavle rekao: budimo ljudi iako smo Srbi...ali dzaba :((((...apsolutno ne znam koji ti je motiv (korist, cilj ili bilo sta drugo) za ovo osim da komsiji (meni) crkne krava...uzasnut sam...-- Astreriks ( talk) 19:59, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Don't revert due solely to "no consensus" regarding [1]. Respectfully. Crazynas t 13:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Letting you know about this, in case you want to weigh in. Flyer22 ( talk) 22:11, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
As you participated in discusion before, please see here the last proposition. Thanks! -- WhiteWriter speaks 22:14, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is " Santorum vs santorum". Thank you. -- The Gnome ( talk) 07:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Freedom to Marry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anne Hathaway, Jack Reed and Bob Casey ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
As one of the editors involved, you may want to comment: [ [2]] Dominus Vobisdu ( talk) 05:57, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
I have granted rollback rights to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. An optimist on the run! 16:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Wikiwind.
You are invited to join
WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion. |
---|
Super sto sam nasao nekoga iz Bivse Juge :) Zelim i ja da pomognem Srbiji na wikiju. Do sada sam samo jedan "article" napisao ali zelim da napisem, ili pomognem, na mnogo vise. Moj prvi "article" je bijo Sumadijska Okruzna Liga Srbije, ne brini dodacu vise samo kad budem imao vremena. Vidim da imas vise iskustva od mene, i hteo bi da budemo u kontaktu preko wiki. Bez frke brate, hvala :D MoravaiDrina ( talk) 06:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC) |
Hi, Wikiwind, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles and content that have been nominated for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable, and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles and content to quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again — Welcome! Northamerica1000 (talk) 18:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC) |
Please explain why you think an AfD is appropriate? The article was previously redirected by consensus, therefore the article should remain redirected until consensus changes. Fasttimes68 ( talk) 21:13, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
PS. If you continue to abuse your rollback privileges, I will ask their removal. See WP:ROLLBACK.-- В и к и T 21:32, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 04:50, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
With a significant number of Opposes, a ban right now would be controversial and noisy. With that closure in place, it is very unlikely that POV editing will get by the onlookers, and any ban will be much easier to enforce and defend because it comes after an unambiguous warning of consequences.
The alternative is a "no consensus" close and punt it to ArbCom, which would leave you arguing for another month or two.
Watch, wait, and let Anupam dig their own grave if that's how it must be. Guy ( Help!) 11:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Добродошли!
We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to
Serbia. A few features of the project that you might find helpful:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or any other member of the project, we'll be happy to help you.
Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Happy editing!
WhiteWriter
speaks
23:22, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is " Tomislav Nikolić". Thank you. -- ◅PRODUCER ( TALK) 16:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, we’ve been running a research experiment with SuggestBot and would like to ask you some questions about Wikipedia and SuggestBot. You can find more information and the questions on this page. It should take less than ten minutes to respond. We would greatly appreciate if you had the time to participate! Regards, Nettrom ( talk) 19:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Given your earlier interest, perhaps you'd care to comment at Talk:LGBT parenting#Regnerus follow up Thanks. Bmclaughlin9 ( talk) 16:47, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 17:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedian!
Because you were a participating member of the Deletion review for Category:Gay Wikipedians, I've contacted you to let you (and all others involved) know about and participate in the current category discussion. Thanks for your participation!
Ncboy2010 ( talk) 15:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Could you give your opinion here? Ron 1987 ( talk) 12:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.
If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:40, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!
If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot ( talk) 05:16, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Just wanted to tell you that there is discussion happening on the changes you made to the discussion, although I wan't 100% sure which changes your comment was referring to. I also wanted to state that I personally find your casual threats of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and casual inappropriate use of Wikipedia:Requests for comment to be immature. If you could actually discuss concerns on the talk page and act civil, it would make me happier and probably please other users on Wikipedia. ZybthRanger (talk) (contribs) 21:54, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
I have read the article. Please read the talkpage. I dispute the use of this in the lead as original research and undue weight. While thauthor does use the term its weight on this article is more than questionable. Would you be inclined to discuss on the talkpage?-- Amadscientist ( talk) 22:09, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Flyer22 ( talk) 17:27, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello. As a participant in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion article titles, you may wish to register an opinion on its followup RFC, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, which is now in its community feedback phase. Please note that WP:RFC/AAMC is not simply a repeat of WP:RFC/AAT, and is attempting to achieve better results by asking a more narrowly-focused, policy-based question of the community. Assumptions based on the previous RFC should be discarded before participation, particularly the assumption that Wikipedia has or inherently needs to have articles covering generalized perspective on each side of abortion advocacy, and that what we are trying to do is come up with labels for that. Thanks! —chaos5023 20:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
By any chance, did you save a copy of the edits on YRC's user talk page before they got oversighted last night? Please drop me an email if you did. Prioryman ( talk) 02:53, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
It would also be very helpful, since you saw the edits in question, if you could describe their nature on AN/I and why you reverted them. It's understandable that some people are frustrated that they can't see the evidence but I think it would help if those who did see them could explain what they saw. Prioryman ( talk) 03:01, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User North8000 disruptive talk page editing at talk:Homophobia. Thank you. - Mr X 19:53, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. Just letting you know that the case you filed against Youreallycan has been declined. Best, NW ( Talk) 22:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 17:35, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Holiday Cheer | ||
Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS |
You might have missed it, but he reduced the lead in mostly the same way you reverted him before. I reverted him this time and left a message on his talk page about it.
And Happy Holidays. Flyer22 ( talk) 16:29, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Since you filed an 3RR report 12 hours ago with no result yet, I thought I should let you know I have followed up at ANI, where I have broadened the scope of the complaint somewhat. Rivertorch ( talk) 10:41, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi; FYI, please see my comment in this section. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:04, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thank you -- Mstudiodf ( talk) 19:18, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
A few months ago, you participated in a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Did you know about Gibraltar-related DYKs on the Main Page. I am proposing that the temporary restrictions on such DYKs, which were imposed in September 2012, should be lifted and have set out a case for doing so at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Gibraltar-related DYKs. If you have a view on this, please comment at that page. Prioryman ( talk) 21:59, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, I just saw your revert. (I didn't see it until after my second edit.) Sorry about that bad edit summary. I really did get the 404 error...in hindsight I think it may have been because I was clicking on the link from a diff. Even though the edit summary was wrong, I still think the removal was valid for other reasons. ~ Adjwilley ( talk) 20:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Sometimes as an ordinary contributer I feel somewhat powerless when up against an administrator that knows the system better than I do. I've never been out to distort articles and promote something that isn't there. All I want to do is improve visbility and coverage of LGBT issues in a modest and balanced way. Contaldo80 ( talk) 15:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
We have developed an exciting new version of SuggestBot’s interface with some cool features! Volunteer to be one of the first users to try it and help us make it better by answering a short survey! If you’re interested in participating, leave us a message on SuggestBot’s user talk page. Regards from Nettrom, SuggestBot’s caretaker. 18:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much with your help in getting my name settled there. — Ched : ? 16:35, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, just letting you know that although you nominated
2guys1horse.com for deletion, someone has already redirected the page to
Enumclaw horse sex case—you seem to have accidentally added the AfD template to the target page, so I've removed it. Scratch that; your edit beat mine! –
296.x (
talk)
11:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 00:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. You aren't really the subject of it, only mentioned, but better safe than sorry thought I'd tell you. CarolMooreDC - talkie talkie🗽 01:36, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello Wikiwind, I'm contacting you because we need some Serbian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on sr.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Serbian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) ( talk) 22:44, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I posted the bib.irb.hr link for Jovanovic's doctoral thesis – http://bib.irb.hr/prikazi-rad?lang=en&rad=385960 – to the Croatian biography's talk page last night. Article unchanged, still locked. Andreas JN 466 15:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
For some reason, the e-mail reply I've sent you has bounced. Here's the answer:
Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
by The Interior ( talk · contribs), Ocaasi ( talk · contribs)
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. -- The Interior 21:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:33, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your attempt to keep the article sane and based on reliable sources. Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 15:18, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and sourced everything that you contested as unsourced. Feel free to drop me a note if you see errors or omissions. Providing encyclopedic coverage of such a controversial topic is indeed a delicate BLP balance, isn't it? Jclemens ( talk) 00:01, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
I suggest you stop moving the edit war you are involved in to new language versions all the time. Discuss things on one language version (why not here on enwp?) and then move on to other language versions. GameOn ( talk) 08:32, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, regarding some of your recent comments at the RfD, I gently suggest that you leave out (and even go back and strike) your thoughts regarding other editors' motivations. See WP:Etiquette - there are various procedures for handling difficult situations with other editors (e.g. WP:WQA, WP:DDE, WP:DR), but until that point it's best to stick to policy; don't give others the ability to bring action against you. Best, AV3000 ( talk) 14:09, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
sorry, I said talk page but meant discussion page
All the best
Boynamedsue ( talk) 18:33, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
a strange question in deed. a simple answer: why should u see me on other language wikis, anyways? i don't know, since i don't see any point on wasting my time there. goodone ( talk) 14:31, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
As the article is a redirect from National Socialism and there is NO separate article thereon, it is clear that referring to National Socialism and making it extremely clear that the reference is not about Nazism must belong properly in some article, and this is "the only game in town". Please self-revert the Nazism revert you made, or show me what article it belongs in -- noting that there is NO "National Socialism" article. Cheers. Collect ( talk) 17:41, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
What about this as a sexual orientation? You want to support its inclusion at the Sexual orientation article? Homosexuals and zoosexuals, in the same boat. You can come in and comment on the talk page. 120.203.215.11 ( talk) 01:17, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
ne verujem...frapirao sam se kad sam video da si ti predlozio brisanje clanka potpisani...nije te mrzelo da trazis clanak po engleskoj vikipediji i od milion stranih korisnika i urednika ti budes bas taj koji ce predloziti brisanje clanka o srpskoj seriji na engleskom vikiju??? ...ej, srbine, srbine... najgori smo...sad razumem izreku ko ce kome ako ne svoj svome...i treba da izumremo i medjusobno se istebimo kad smo ovakvi...lepo je patrijarh Pavle rekao: budimo ljudi iako smo Srbi...ali dzaba :((((...apsolutno ne znam koji ti je motiv (korist, cilj ili bilo sta drugo) za ovo osim da komsiji (meni) crkne krava...uzasnut sam...-- Astreriks ( talk) 19:59, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Don't revert due solely to "no consensus" regarding [1]. Respectfully. Crazynas t 13:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Letting you know about this, in case you want to weigh in. Flyer22 ( talk) 22:11, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
As you participated in discusion before, please see here the last proposition. Thanks! -- WhiteWriter speaks 22:14, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is " Santorum vs santorum". Thank you. -- The Gnome ( talk) 07:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Freedom to Marry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anne Hathaway, Jack Reed and Bob Casey ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
As one of the editors involved, you may want to comment: [ [2]] Dominus Vobisdu ( talk) 05:57, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
I have granted rollback rights to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. An optimist on the run! 16:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Wikiwind.
You are invited to join
WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion. |
---|
Super sto sam nasao nekoga iz Bivse Juge :) Zelim i ja da pomognem Srbiji na wikiju. Do sada sam samo jedan "article" napisao ali zelim da napisem, ili pomognem, na mnogo vise. Moj prvi "article" je bijo Sumadijska Okruzna Liga Srbije, ne brini dodacu vise samo kad budem imao vremena. Vidim da imas vise iskustva od mene, i hteo bi da budemo u kontaktu preko wiki. Bez frke brate, hvala :D MoravaiDrina ( talk) 06:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC) |
Hi, Wikiwind, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles and content that have been nominated for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable, and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles and content to quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again — Welcome! Northamerica1000 (talk) 18:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC) |
Please explain why you think an AfD is appropriate? The article was previously redirected by consensus, therefore the article should remain redirected until consensus changes. Fasttimes68 ( talk) 21:13, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
PS. If you continue to abuse your rollback privileges, I will ask their removal. See WP:ROLLBACK.-- В и к и T 21:32, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 04:50, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
With a significant number of Opposes, a ban right now would be controversial and noisy. With that closure in place, it is very unlikely that POV editing will get by the onlookers, and any ban will be much easier to enforce and defend because it comes after an unambiguous warning of consequences.
The alternative is a "no consensus" close and punt it to ArbCom, which would leave you arguing for another month or two.
Watch, wait, and let Anupam dig their own grave if that's how it must be. Guy ( Help!) 11:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Добродошли!
We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to
Serbia. A few features of the project that you might find helpful:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or any other member of the project, we'll be happy to help you.
Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Happy editing!
WhiteWriter
speaks
23:22, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is " Tomislav Nikolić". Thank you. -- ◅PRODUCER ( TALK) 16:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, we’ve been running a research experiment with SuggestBot and would like to ask you some questions about Wikipedia and SuggestBot. You can find more information and the questions on this page. It should take less than ten minutes to respond. We would greatly appreciate if you had the time to participate! Regards, Nettrom ( talk) 19:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Given your earlier interest, perhaps you'd care to comment at Talk:LGBT parenting#Regnerus follow up Thanks. Bmclaughlin9 ( talk) 16:47, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 17:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedian!
Because you were a participating member of the Deletion review for Category:Gay Wikipedians, I've contacted you to let you (and all others involved) know about and participate in the current category discussion. Thanks for your participation!
Ncboy2010 ( talk) 15:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Could you give your opinion here? Ron 1987 ( talk) 12:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.
If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:40, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!
If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot ( talk) 05:16, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Just wanted to tell you that there is discussion happening on the changes you made to the discussion, although I wan't 100% sure which changes your comment was referring to. I also wanted to state that I personally find your casual threats of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and casual inappropriate use of Wikipedia:Requests for comment to be immature. If you could actually discuss concerns on the talk page and act civil, it would make me happier and probably please other users on Wikipedia. ZybthRanger (talk) (contribs) 21:54, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
I have read the article. Please read the talkpage. I dispute the use of this in the lead as original research and undue weight. While thauthor does use the term its weight on this article is more than questionable. Would you be inclined to discuss on the talkpage?-- Amadscientist ( talk) 22:09, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Flyer22 ( talk) 17:27, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello. As a participant in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion article titles, you may wish to register an opinion on its followup RFC, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, which is now in its community feedback phase. Please note that WP:RFC/AAMC is not simply a repeat of WP:RFC/AAT, and is attempting to achieve better results by asking a more narrowly-focused, policy-based question of the community. Assumptions based on the previous RFC should be discarded before participation, particularly the assumption that Wikipedia has or inherently needs to have articles covering generalized perspective on each side of abortion advocacy, and that what we are trying to do is come up with labels for that. Thanks! —chaos5023 20:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
By any chance, did you save a copy of the edits on YRC's user talk page before they got oversighted last night? Please drop me an email if you did. Prioryman ( talk) 02:53, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
It would also be very helpful, since you saw the edits in question, if you could describe their nature on AN/I and why you reverted them. It's understandable that some people are frustrated that they can't see the evidence but I think it would help if those who did see them could explain what they saw. Prioryman ( talk) 03:01, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User North8000 disruptive talk page editing at talk:Homophobia. Thank you. - Mr X 19:53, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. Just letting you know that the case you filed against Youreallycan has been declined. Best, NW ( Talk) 22:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 17:35, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Holiday Cheer | ||
Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS |
You might have missed it, but he reduced the lead in mostly the same way you reverted him before. I reverted him this time and left a message on his talk page about it.
And Happy Holidays. Flyer22 ( talk) 16:29, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Since you filed an 3RR report 12 hours ago with no result yet, I thought I should let you know I have followed up at ANI, where I have broadened the scope of the complaint somewhat. Rivertorch ( talk) 10:41, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi; FYI, please see my comment in this section. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:04, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thank you -- Mstudiodf ( talk) 19:18, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
A few months ago, you participated in a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Did you know about Gibraltar-related DYKs on the Main Page. I am proposing that the temporary restrictions on such DYKs, which were imposed in September 2012, should be lifted and have set out a case for doing so at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Gibraltar-related DYKs. If you have a view on this, please comment at that page. Prioryman ( talk) 21:59, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, I just saw your revert. (I didn't see it until after my second edit.) Sorry about that bad edit summary. I really did get the 404 error...in hindsight I think it may have been because I was clicking on the link from a diff. Even though the edit summary was wrong, I still think the removal was valid for other reasons. ~ Adjwilley ( talk) 20:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Sometimes as an ordinary contributer I feel somewhat powerless when up against an administrator that knows the system better than I do. I've never been out to distort articles and promote something that isn't there. All I want to do is improve visbility and coverage of LGBT issues in a modest and balanced way. Contaldo80 ( talk) 15:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
We have developed an exciting new version of SuggestBot’s interface with some cool features! Volunteer to be one of the first users to try it and help us make it better by answering a short survey! If you’re interested in participating, leave us a message on SuggestBot’s user talk page. Regards from Nettrom, SuggestBot’s caretaker. 18:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much with your help in getting my name settled there. — Ched : ? 16:35, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, just letting you know that although you nominated
2guys1horse.com for deletion, someone has already redirected the page to
Enumclaw horse sex case—you seem to have accidentally added the AfD template to the target page, so I've removed it. Scratch that; your edit beat mine! –
296.x (
talk)
11:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 00:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. You aren't really the subject of it, only mentioned, but better safe than sorry thought I'd tell you. CarolMooreDC - talkie talkie🗽 01:36, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello Wikiwind, I'm contacting you because we need some Serbian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on sr.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Serbian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) ( talk) 22:44, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I posted the bib.irb.hr link for Jovanovic's doctoral thesis – http://bib.irb.hr/prikazi-rad?lang=en&rad=385960 – to the Croatian biography's talk page last night. Article unchanged, still locked. Andreas JN 466 15:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
For some reason, the e-mail reply I've sent you has bounced. Here's the answer:
Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
by The Interior ( talk · contribs), Ocaasi ( talk · contribs)
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. -- The Interior 21:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)