hi guys. some editors are such a headache. sigh!!!
![]() |
Hi WikiBriefed! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 17:21, 18 October 2015 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:Dilwale1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Arjann ( talk) 07:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dilwale1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:37, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dilwale1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dilwale2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
Fan (film). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
331dot (
talk)
15:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Looking at your recent edits, it appears that you have a bias for BOI soures. Please note that "most reliable source" doesn't mean "top priority sources", and any other reliable sources will be used if they verify the content appropiately and are reliable. -- TL22 ( talk) 13:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
I agree with you that BoxofficeIndia is reliable website. You are also correct that current worldwide collection of a newly released movie won't be same as final worldwide collections. But users can update the latest collection according to the source.
There are other sources for boxoffice as business related newspapers as
The Economic Times which publishes articles as this.
The Financial Express which belongs to the The Indian Express group. They also report about boxoffice related news.
International Business Times box office related.
I am not so sure about Koimoi, but its not completely unreliable. Galaxy Kid ( talk) 16:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Galaxy Kid (
talk)
17:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 220 of Borg 18:17, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to
3 Idiots , as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with
Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the
reversion of clear-cut
vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.
220
of
Borg
18:18, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
D'SuperHero. Your recent edit to the page
Fan (film) appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Although your summary included a hostile comment, first get the source to prove and work with Wikipedia members.
D'SuperHero (
talk)
08:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for making a report on
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and
all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in
vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately
warned. Please note there is a difference between
vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in
good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. I have reported you on AIV.
D'SuperHero (
talk) 06:20, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
D'SuperHero (
talk)
06:20, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
I see that after you were told that attempting to restrict sources to Box Office India was not acceptable, and after your attention was drawn to a discussion of your editing at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, you have continued not only to replace other sources with that source, but also to post messages telling other editors that they are not to use other sources. What is more, you have repeatedly claimed that this is a decision of "the community", although in fact it is purely your own opinion. Misrepresenting your personal opinion as some sort of "community" policy is totally unacceptable. I also see that you have used edit summaries which attack other editors. If you continue in the same way you will be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 09:36, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Re:
[1]
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk)
19:59, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. The editor who uses the pseudonym "
JamesBWatson" (
talk)
20:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on
Fan (film). Thank you. i.e.
this edit summary
Dl2000 (
talk)
01:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, please chill with the shouty, histrionic edit summaries. If you can't discuss and explain things in a normal, civilized tone, you're not going to do well here. Cartoonish conspiracy rants like this and emotionally fueled summaries like this are not the way to ingratiate yourself with the community. Lastly, be sure to familiarize yourself with WP:MINOR. Only cosmetic changes like spelling fixes, punctuation fixes, and adding wikilinks should be marked as minor. These are not minor edits: [2] [3] [4]. And why would you remove valid references from an article? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 19:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Why do you hate SRK? Tell me that first Sir. Fine I got minor thingy. Regarding those links, DID YOU EVEN BOTHER TO CHECK IF THEY WORK OR NOT or you have this bad abit of spewing venom on me and going to the pages that I visit and finding faults with everything I do. Just tell me you a SRK hater only or a Sallu fan also??
WikiBriefed (
talk)
19:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
WikiBriefed, I think you misunderstand. Cyphoidbomb reverted your edits at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive906 because you were editing an archive of a discussion from November 2015. Please don't edit archives; they're supposed to be a record of what happened in the past, they're not live discussions. I'm going to remove your archive edit again; please don't revert me.
Also, please don't edit as rudely as this anywhere on Wikipedia, or you will soon be blocked again. I see you attacking Cyphoidbomb just above on this page in a very impolite fashion. I'll block you myself if you don't speak in a civil manner going forward. Bishonen | talk 20:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC).
Wikipedia expects everybody to speak civilly to others. To call other users "fanatics" or "haters", as you did here, and in these edit summaries, is considered extremely rude. It violates the Assume good faith principle. And don't tell people with different opinions from you to "stay away" from certain pages either, as you did here; that violates a whole bunch of principles. I urge you to read the No personal attacks and Ownership of content policies before you edit again. Also, the invective and hostility here ("massive SRK troll", etc) is simply ridiculous. Don't talk like that again, to anybody. Bishonen | talk 10:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC).
Articles require specific dates. Since nobody has yet bothered to submit a specific date of release at Raees (film), it was up to me to find a source that cited a specific date. If this is a confusing issue for you, let me know how I can clarify it in a way that you can process. I thought I did a pretty good job of explaining "'Eid' is not universally understood (Note: WP:SEASON)" We shouldn't be saying "Christmas 2016" or "Autumn 2016" or "Passover 2016" either. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 21:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Fan (film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff:
[5] If you can't find a reliable source to support your genre changes, please avoid making them, as genre is subjective, and your personal interpretation is insufficient for inclusion in an article.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
04:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. Your edits have been or will be
reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Yashthepunisher ( talk) 17:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
WHY only my edit seems disruptive to you instead of that salman fanbot? WikiBriefed ( talk) 17:48, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Salman Khan filmography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thomas.W talk 18:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bishonen |
talk
21:35, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with
this edit to
37th Filmfare Awards.
Coasterlover
1994
00:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
The article Filmfare Award for Lux New Face of the Year has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Safiel (
talk)
18:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Filmfare Award for Best Female Debut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:46, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
The previous 1-year semiprotection had expired. I renewed it for another year. DMacks ( talk) 21:14, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
awesome man WikiBriefed ( talk) 05:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
You've been around long enough to have familiarized yourself with our guidelines on reliable sources. I'm not sure why you'd think that this blog is valid for inclusion in an article, as you added here, but it is not, and I have reverted those changes. In addition, comparing these two sentences, the word "illegal" is redundant, when we have the word "prohibition". Prohibition = illegal, and the word applies to all the items in the list. I have reverted that change.
I will also note that this was previously reverted by DMacks with a clear explanation. Lastly, the content about SRK dressing up in a "never-before-seen" 1980s outfit is unencyclopedic. Actors dress differently all the time. This is not noteworthy information and it reads as amateurish parroting of trade rags for lack of anything more significant to talk about. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, WikiBriefed, please take Cyphoidbomb's critique above very seriously. To reinsert a completely illogical word, which has already once been deleted with a clear explanation, as you did here, is either careless or incompetent. It's the kind of thing that creates work for other users. The use of a blog as a source, and the silly sentence about "a never before seen look from 1980s ghetto Gujarat", is also incompetent editing. The phrasing is clearly simply lifted from this promotion of the film. New editors can be excused for editing poorly, but it's time you learned something from the things you have been told over and over, and raised the quality of your editing. If you don't, you may be blocked as a net negative for the encyclopedia, even if you do mean well. Bishonen | talk 17:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC).
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
16:58, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Boing! said Zebedee (
talk)
17:08, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Hello, WikiBriefed. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
hi guys. some editors are such a headache. sigh!!!
![]() |
Hi WikiBriefed! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 17:21, 18 October 2015 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:Dilwale1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Arjann ( talk) 07:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dilwale1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:37, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dilwale1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dilwale2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
Fan (film). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
331dot (
talk)
15:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Looking at your recent edits, it appears that you have a bias for BOI soures. Please note that "most reliable source" doesn't mean "top priority sources", and any other reliable sources will be used if they verify the content appropiately and are reliable. -- TL22 ( talk) 13:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
I agree with you that BoxofficeIndia is reliable website. You are also correct that current worldwide collection of a newly released movie won't be same as final worldwide collections. But users can update the latest collection according to the source.
There are other sources for boxoffice as business related newspapers as
The Economic Times which publishes articles as this.
The Financial Express which belongs to the The Indian Express group. They also report about boxoffice related news.
International Business Times box office related.
I am not so sure about Koimoi, but its not completely unreliable. Galaxy Kid ( talk) 16:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Galaxy Kid (
talk)
17:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 220 of Borg 18:17, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to
3 Idiots , as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with
Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the
reversion of clear-cut
vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.
220
of
Borg
18:18, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
D'SuperHero. Your recent edit to the page
Fan (film) appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Although your summary included a hostile comment, first get the source to prove and work with Wikipedia members.
D'SuperHero (
talk)
08:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for making a report on
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and
all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in
vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately
warned. Please note there is a difference between
vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in
good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. I have reported you on AIV.
D'SuperHero (
talk) 06:20, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
D'SuperHero (
talk)
06:20, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
I see that after you were told that attempting to restrict sources to Box Office India was not acceptable, and after your attention was drawn to a discussion of your editing at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, you have continued not only to replace other sources with that source, but also to post messages telling other editors that they are not to use other sources. What is more, you have repeatedly claimed that this is a decision of "the community", although in fact it is purely your own opinion. Misrepresenting your personal opinion as some sort of "community" policy is totally unacceptable. I also see that you have used edit summaries which attack other editors. If you continue in the same way you will be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 09:36, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Re:
[1]
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk)
19:59, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. The editor who uses the pseudonym "
JamesBWatson" (
talk)
20:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on
Fan (film). Thank you. i.e.
this edit summary
Dl2000 (
talk)
01:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, please chill with the shouty, histrionic edit summaries. If you can't discuss and explain things in a normal, civilized tone, you're not going to do well here. Cartoonish conspiracy rants like this and emotionally fueled summaries like this are not the way to ingratiate yourself with the community. Lastly, be sure to familiarize yourself with WP:MINOR. Only cosmetic changes like spelling fixes, punctuation fixes, and adding wikilinks should be marked as minor. These are not minor edits: [2] [3] [4]. And why would you remove valid references from an article? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 19:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Why do you hate SRK? Tell me that first Sir. Fine I got minor thingy. Regarding those links, DID YOU EVEN BOTHER TO CHECK IF THEY WORK OR NOT or you have this bad abit of spewing venom on me and going to the pages that I visit and finding faults with everything I do. Just tell me you a SRK hater only or a Sallu fan also??
WikiBriefed (
talk)
19:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
WikiBriefed, I think you misunderstand. Cyphoidbomb reverted your edits at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive906 because you were editing an archive of a discussion from November 2015. Please don't edit archives; they're supposed to be a record of what happened in the past, they're not live discussions. I'm going to remove your archive edit again; please don't revert me.
Also, please don't edit as rudely as this anywhere on Wikipedia, or you will soon be blocked again. I see you attacking Cyphoidbomb just above on this page in a very impolite fashion. I'll block you myself if you don't speak in a civil manner going forward. Bishonen | talk 20:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC).
Wikipedia expects everybody to speak civilly to others. To call other users "fanatics" or "haters", as you did here, and in these edit summaries, is considered extremely rude. It violates the Assume good faith principle. And don't tell people with different opinions from you to "stay away" from certain pages either, as you did here; that violates a whole bunch of principles. I urge you to read the No personal attacks and Ownership of content policies before you edit again. Also, the invective and hostility here ("massive SRK troll", etc) is simply ridiculous. Don't talk like that again, to anybody. Bishonen | talk 10:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC).
Articles require specific dates. Since nobody has yet bothered to submit a specific date of release at Raees (film), it was up to me to find a source that cited a specific date. If this is a confusing issue for you, let me know how I can clarify it in a way that you can process. I thought I did a pretty good job of explaining "'Eid' is not universally understood (Note: WP:SEASON)" We shouldn't be saying "Christmas 2016" or "Autumn 2016" or "Passover 2016" either. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 21:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Fan (film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff:
[5] If you can't find a reliable source to support your genre changes, please avoid making them, as genre is subjective, and your personal interpretation is insufficient for inclusion in an article.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
04:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. Your edits have been or will be
reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Yashthepunisher ( talk) 17:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
WHY only my edit seems disruptive to you instead of that salman fanbot? WikiBriefed ( talk) 17:48, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Salman Khan filmography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thomas.W talk 18:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bishonen |
talk
21:35, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with
this edit to
37th Filmfare Awards.
Coasterlover
1994
00:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
The article Filmfare Award for Lux New Face of the Year has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Safiel (
talk)
18:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Filmfare Award for Best Female Debut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:46, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
The previous 1-year semiprotection had expired. I renewed it for another year. DMacks ( talk) 21:14, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
awesome man WikiBriefed ( talk) 05:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
You've been around long enough to have familiarized yourself with our guidelines on reliable sources. I'm not sure why you'd think that this blog is valid for inclusion in an article, as you added here, but it is not, and I have reverted those changes. In addition, comparing these two sentences, the word "illegal" is redundant, when we have the word "prohibition". Prohibition = illegal, and the word applies to all the items in the list. I have reverted that change.
I will also note that this was previously reverted by DMacks with a clear explanation. Lastly, the content about SRK dressing up in a "never-before-seen" 1980s outfit is unencyclopedic. Actors dress differently all the time. This is not noteworthy information and it reads as amateurish parroting of trade rags for lack of anything more significant to talk about. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, WikiBriefed, please take Cyphoidbomb's critique above very seriously. To reinsert a completely illogical word, which has already once been deleted with a clear explanation, as you did here, is either careless or incompetent. It's the kind of thing that creates work for other users. The use of a blog as a source, and the silly sentence about "a never before seen look from 1980s ghetto Gujarat", is also incompetent editing. The phrasing is clearly simply lifted from this promotion of the film. New editors can be excused for editing poorly, but it's time you learned something from the things you have been told over and over, and raised the quality of your editing. If you don't, you may be blocked as a net negative for the encyclopedia, even if you do mean well. Bishonen | talk 17:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC).
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
16:58, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Boing! said Zebedee (
talk)
17:08, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Hello, WikiBriefed. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)