25pxInformation Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Magyaristani, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. i wasnt vandalising, i created a new page all the reference underneath.-- West Bank Boy 15:41, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
im legitimizing anything, magyaristani does exist and it's not like the magyar who created the stupid idea of calling themself Huns.-- West Bank Boy 17:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
(rv West Bank boy, please explain any changes in the talk page, especially why you disagree with official government census figures)
I disagee with official government census figures cause these are unreliable sources written by commies or socialist or some extreme fundamentalist trying to hide the truth of muslims population in hungary.
I just wanna notify u that im hungarian (my religion is islam) and i've seen muslims in great numbers in hungary, there's no such a thing as 3,000 or 6,000 or 300 or whatever, these are very extremely nationalist propaganda done by heartless hungarians
from other part of the world like america who have never been to hungary nor know anything about hungary like i do as i grew up in there and experience things in there, yet the topic about islam in hungary seem to keep changing everyweek writing by some all sort of anti-Islam members of wiki who wants things to be on their way and not wiki's way
, vandalising as much as they can to make a fun out these things,
however this topic was to be disputed but again there's always some vandals who comes take these off without much point.
It's pretty sad that there are many who has no mercy for this topic and they had to be taught a good lesson by someone moderate. anyway the reference i posted about muslim population in hungary is very much referenced as you can see it is over 606,000 not 3201 or all these extremist unreferenced sources which are damaging muslim's reputation in hungary and wikipedia itself.
These are very important fundamental aspect for wiki and for muslims in hungary to keep the peace and not causing conflict for unreferenced source which provokes things into conflict and violence cause by some idiot who's writing things in wiki which can endangers other's lifes, afterall wiki is very popular in hungary.
Can you imaging if Wikipedia is a fundamentalist website and not a pedia website????
geez
i hardly come here cause it's getting fundamentally anti-islam and it's a shame. This has to stop.
(MY)This is known as an ad hominum attack. You should not besmirch the reputation of people by assuming they must have ignoble motives. This is similar to my removing anything you say because you are a Muslim. see assume good faith
(MY) ad hominum
(MY)Wiki is interested in truth. Wikipedians tend to value truth above all else. There are many sources of contradictory information on the web, we have to work out which is the most reliable. Why do you think Muslims were underrepresented in the census? (for example are a lot of them unregistered workers?), why is your source of 606,000 more reliable?
(MY)I do not think that changing a number is Wikipedia:Vandalism. Vandalism is blanking pages or inserting obscenities. You are not a vandal as you are changing a page to what you believe to be true. Similarly, the person who reverts is not a vandal either.
(MY) ad hominum
(MY) ad hominum
(MY)So are you saying "put this statistic in otherwise there will be violence". We must put the truth in Wikipedia, not what we would like to be the truth, or to
(MY)Yes I can see Conservapedia
(MY)geez = By Jesus(pbuh). This may be offensive to catholics and muslims who think Jesus(pbuh) was a prophet
Thanks for uploading Image:39.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add content without
citing
reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you.
Also, concerning the edit you did on my User Talk page:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
Additionally, concerning User Talk pages, please refrain from using patronising language. It can be offending.
Szabi 14:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:10.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I have deleted Magyaristani because frankly it's completely made up. That's not to say that there are no muslims in Hungary, I'm sure there are. But that particular article is entirely your own original research (or imagination). You have provided no evidence that the term is used and, judging by your other contributions, you seem to be here to cause trouble more than anything. Your user page is classical flamebait, as is the accompanying image. Pascal.Tesson 03:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Could you explain this, dear friend? :)
-- peyerk 07:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
it is still a source to prove wikipedia, that there are that many. West Bank Boy 16:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
dont tell me to stop it, ur the one that started doing all the hoax on islam in hungary, ur just a full of hate towards muslims, send ur hate somewhere else, go to islam in serbia or romania and carry on ur hate there. West Bank Boy 16:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Dear WBB,
I would like to discuss the source that you keep linking here. Are you ready to answer any question?
-- peyerk 17:06, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Dear Peyerk, tudsz magyarul beszelni? ez nagyan fontos hogy ezt a sourcesek kel betenni mert mar van eleg sok muzsulman magyarorszagon, csak a problema az hogy menni van? 3,000 fo ez semmi, van tobb mint 3,000 fo, ezt en nagyon jo tudom mert en voltam magyarorszagon eleg tobbszor. en nem akarok haboruzsni veled mert en nem vagyok olyan fajta ember aki szeret haboruzsni, jobb hogy ezt teg be az agyadban es a macsik, not putting another source on that article can cause internal conflict in hungary afterall Islam is the fastest growing religion in hungary and most of the converts are magyars like me, so better put both of the sources in it, just to keep the peace, it very sad that many people are very wikimaniac and they quickly believes it whatever the article says. Just imagine if any other muslims in hungary jumped into wiki and sees these things, Isten õrű. West Bank Boy 17:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Hungarian is my mothertongue, im hungarian now and im proud to be, i hardly can speak arabic or english, hungarian was the first language i spoke when i was a small child, didnt understand english or arabic back then, yes maybe im arab but what kind of arab am i when i cant speak arabic but speak hungarian lol. West Bank Boy 06:45, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
yes i know habib but doesnt most hungarians doesnt speak perfect hungarian? hungarian language is not easy to learn, it's just as hard as arabic or chinese, and yes i am hungarian, cause im assimilated into hungarian, if any arabs try re-arabnise me, i wont accept it cause that how much im hungarian with Islam as my religion. when live in transylvania or slovakia for example i still wont assimilate into anything but hungarian. hungarian culture is a very colourful culture and it is very enough for me to accept it, not just me but any minorities in hungary like arabs, pakistanis, chinese, tatars, except ciganys, are strong enough to be assimilated into magyar, even africans, yeah i said it right, africans who doesnt speak their mothertongue anymore but speak hungarian more better than me,haahahaa a black-coloured hungarians who speak hungarian hahaa, what a funny hungarian winabi-oromo-mobutu people they are who speak hungarian. can u imagine peyerk? West Bank Boy 04:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
25pxInformation Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Magyaristani, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. i wasnt vandalising, i created a new page all the reference underneath.-- West Bank Boy 15:41, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
im legitimizing anything, magyaristani does exist and it's not like the magyar who created the stupid idea of calling themself Huns.-- West Bank Boy 17:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
(rv West Bank boy, please explain any changes in the talk page, especially why you disagree with official government census figures)
I disagee with official government census figures cause these are unreliable sources written by commies or socialist or some extreme fundamentalist trying to hide the truth of muslims population in hungary.
I just wanna notify u that im hungarian (my religion is islam) and i've seen muslims in great numbers in hungary, there's no such a thing as 3,000 or 6,000 or 300 or whatever, these are very extremely nationalist propaganda done by heartless hungarians
from other part of the world like america who have never been to hungary nor know anything about hungary like i do as i grew up in there and experience things in there, yet the topic about islam in hungary seem to keep changing everyweek writing by some all sort of anti-Islam members of wiki who wants things to be on their way and not wiki's way
, vandalising as much as they can to make a fun out these things,
however this topic was to be disputed but again there's always some vandals who comes take these off without much point.
It's pretty sad that there are many who has no mercy for this topic and they had to be taught a good lesson by someone moderate. anyway the reference i posted about muslim population in hungary is very much referenced as you can see it is over 606,000 not 3201 or all these extremist unreferenced sources which are damaging muslim's reputation in hungary and wikipedia itself.
These are very important fundamental aspect for wiki and for muslims in hungary to keep the peace and not causing conflict for unreferenced source which provokes things into conflict and violence cause by some idiot who's writing things in wiki which can endangers other's lifes, afterall wiki is very popular in hungary.
Can you imaging if Wikipedia is a fundamentalist website and not a pedia website????
geez
i hardly come here cause it's getting fundamentally anti-islam and it's a shame. This has to stop.
(MY)This is known as an ad hominum attack. You should not besmirch the reputation of people by assuming they must have ignoble motives. This is similar to my removing anything you say because you are a Muslim. see assume good faith
(MY) ad hominum
(MY)Wiki is interested in truth. Wikipedians tend to value truth above all else. There are many sources of contradictory information on the web, we have to work out which is the most reliable. Why do you think Muslims were underrepresented in the census? (for example are a lot of them unregistered workers?), why is your source of 606,000 more reliable?
(MY)I do not think that changing a number is Wikipedia:Vandalism. Vandalism is blanking pages or inserting obscenities. You are not a vandal as you are changing a page to what you believe to be true. Similarly, the person who reverts is not a vandal either.
(MY) ad hominum
(MY) ad hominum
(MY)So are you saying "put this statistic in otherwise there will be violence". We must put the truth in Wikipedia, not what we would like to be the truth, or to
(MY)Yes I can see Conservapedia
(MY)geez = By Jesus(pbuh). This may be offensive to catholics and muslims who think Jesus(pbuh) was a prophet
Thanks for uploading Image:39.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add content without
citing
reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you.
Also, concerning the edit you did on my User Talk page:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
Additionally, concerning User Talk pages, please refrain from using patronising language. It can be offending.
Szabi 14:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:10.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I have deleted Magyaristani because frankly it's completely made up. That's not to say that there are no muslims in Hungary, I'm sure there are. But that particular article is entirely your own original research (or imagination). You have provided no evidence that the term is used and, judging by your other contributions, you seem to be here to cause trouble more than anything. Your user page is classical flamebait, as is the accompanying image. Pascal.Tesson 03:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Could you explain this, dear friend? :)
-- peyerk 07:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
it is still a source to prove wikipedia, that there are that many. West Bank Boy 16:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
dont tell me to stop it, ur the one that started doing all the hoax on islam in hungary, ur just a full of hate towards muslims, send ur hate somewhere else, go to islam in serbia or romania and carry on ur hate there. West Bank Boy 16:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Dear WBB,
I would like to discuss the source that you keep linking here. Are you ready to answer any question?
-- peyerk 17:06, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Dear Peyerk, tudsz magyarul beszelni? ez nagyan fontos hogy ezt a sourcesek kel betenni mert mar van eleg sok muzsulman magyarorszagon, csak a problema az hogy menni van? 3,000 fo ez semmi, van tobb mint 3,000 fo, ezt en nagyon jo tudom mert en voltam magyarorszagon eleg tobbszor. en nem akarok haboruzsni veled mert en nem vagyok olyan fajta ember aki szeret haboruzsni, jobb hogy ezt teg be az agyadban es a macsik, not putting another source on that article can cause internal conflict in hungary afterall Islam is the fastest growing religion in hungary and most of the converts are magyars like me, so better put both of the sources in it, just to keep the peace, it very sad that many people are very wikimaniac and they quickly believes it whatever the article says. Just imagine if any other muslims in hungary jumped into wiki and sees these things, Isten õrű. West Bank Boy 17:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Hungarian is my mothertongue, im hungarian now and im proud to be, i hardly can speak arabic or english, hungarian was the first language i spoke when i was a small child, didnt understand english or arabic back then, yes maybe im arab but what kind of arab am i when i cant speak arabic but speak hungarian lol. West Bank Boy 06:45, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
yes i know habib but doesnt most hungarians doesnt speak perfect hungarian? hungarian language is not easy to learn, it's just as hard as arabic or chinese, and yes i am hungarian, cause im assimilated into hungarian, if any arabs try re-arabnise me, i wont accept it cause that how much im hungarian with Islam as my religion. when live in transylvania or slovakia for example i still wont assimilate into anything but hungarian. hungarian culture is a very colourful culture and it is very enough for me to accept it, not just me but any minorities in hungary like arabs, pakistanis, chinese, tatars, except ciganys, are strong enough to be assimilated into magyar, even africans, yeah i said it right, africans who doesnt speak their mothertongue anymore but speak hungarian more better than me,haahahaa a black-coloured hungarians who speak hungarian hahaa, what a funny hungarian winabi-oromo-mobutu people they are who speak hungarian. can u imagine peyerk? West Bank Boy 04:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)