![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Bling | Content | Userboxen | Editcount | Talk | Guestbook |
![]() |
Happy New Year! |
Hello WereSpielChequers: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary
blisters. |
Thank you so much! Wishing you a most happy 2022! And thank for all your hard work and contributions around here. Best wishes! -- A.S. Brown ( talk) 07:58, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
A token of thanks
Hi WereSpielChequers! I've
nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk ~~~~~
|
![]() |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
WereSpielChequers,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–
Davey2010
Talk 00:22, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Nattes à chat ( talk) 22:00, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. / Johan (WMF)
18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Template:Welcome training Leeds has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
User:GKFX
talk 19:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, would you please revdel this pair of edits? Egsan Bacon ( talk) 00:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Happy bureaucratship anniversary! Hi WereSpielChequers! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for bureaucratship. Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC) |
![]() |
![]() | |
Nine years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, WereSpielChequers and bbb23. I had added a large amount of content to this article. Why did you delete it? You can re-write what I had written. You can use your vocabulary, but please keep the information, which is extremely important and helps enrich Wikipedia. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brightstarrrr ( talk • contribs) 21:24, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Happy First Edit Day! Hi WereSpielChequers! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 ( talk) 17:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC) |
![]() |
𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 ( talk) 17:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
On this. ip's only edit (added to a talk thread from 2014). Block too? Hope all goes well, Johnbod ( talk) 13:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for reviewing my speedy request on Kyla Carter. Just to add that this article has been created several times under slightly different names, and now it appears to have been created yet again, and moved from drafts into the main space by the creator who has a declared COI. The last time this was speedied (back then called Kyla carter), I believe it was done on the basis of the earlier AfD, and I just lazily referenced the same in this request; apologies. If it doesn't qualify for speedy, so be it, but it shouldn't IMO exist in the main space either, if only because of the COI. Could you please take another look at the history of this, not just under this exact name but also at Kyla carter? Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:50, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello WereSpielChequers.
Following a discussion at the Bureaucrats' noticeboard, the minimum activity requirements for bureaucrats have been updated to also include the the recently updated minimum editing requirements for administrators (i.e. at least 100 edits every 5 years). This will be enforced beginning in January 2023. Should you no longer wish to volunteer as a bureaucrat you may request removal at SRP and.or let us know at WP:BN.
Best regards, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Your input is requested at the freshly-created bureaucrat chat. Useight ( talk) 03:08, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at the 20 Wikipedias that participated in the test. You will be able to turn it off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.
Whatamidoing (WMF) 18:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I was hoping to seek out help with the New York State wiki page. I was being told I was being disruptive.
My concern is that it is potentially politically-motivated in a bit of a subdued understated way. In the "History" section, COVID 19 flag change" subsection, It directs criticism towards the state of NY (and Andrew Cuomo) about the state having 50% of the COVID cases (including court rulings against religious gathering restrictions; we all know that right wing media went off the rails over that policy.)
Anyway, all of this information is included, using the dubious source of Vox.
My attempt has been to temper this section with more.complete and relevant information to bring the argument back into proper context:
1) NYC is the most densely populated city in country, with the highest population, as well as the most daily visitors. No other US city comes close.
2) Population size, density, and movement of people plays a very significant role in the spread of viruses.
I've posted several sources, mostly from Pubmed, but it's considered "disruptive." Meanwhile, the entire section is maintained using Vox as a source.
My concern is the narrative that political extremists on media go to in omitting relevant information when making wild criticisms of certain places and certain politicians. And Wikipedia as an exclyclopedia, also omitting the same relevant information.
My latest source is this:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239687/
Look at the references in that source. They are many and varied. The main conclusion to be drawn is this:
" that population density has a significantly positive effect on the number of cases but not the number of deaths, as the latter is better explained by measures of preparedness. Plausible explanations are presented for the results to conclude that the “density paradox” is not really a paradox. This paper makes a contribution by shedding more light on a frequently debated issue by using a completely different, and more robust, statistical techniques and by providing results that may be helpful for health and urban planners."
The gover or of NY was in a very unique position of having NYC as the anchor of the Mid Atlantic megalopolis that spans from Virginia, up to New Hampshire along the entire Mid Atlantic seaboard, and therefore, unique measure needed to be taken for a major health crisis that uniquely affects such heavily urbanized areas.
Since I was unable to get anywhere with two users on the NY State page, I decided to find a way to file an official dispute. I found a page with a list of highly experienced editors that are recently active, and I decided to hit you up
Thank you. Nihilianth ( talk) 16:17, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
@werespielchequers , I'll check that out and leave it as a concern. Nihilianth ( talk) 19:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Can you please take a look at Futebul's activity at Kurmanc. It's a POV-article that should be a redirect (and more than one experienced editor has been involved) but Futebul and seemingly sock Hydralon keep reverting. -- Semsûrî ( talk) 09:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Dear CambridgeBayWeather,
I added the disambiguation page because if I do a Google search for "Antony Barnett Wikipedia" Google will not produce this page, it produces "Anthony Barnett (writer)".
In fact, after several months, I think Google has not even indexed the page.
how can this be solved? i'm guessing most people search for Wiki pages directly through Google. And even the most well phrased search will send searchers to the wrong page.
-Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christopher22500 ( talk • contribs) 15:33, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Elizabeth Chong siew Chu razaruddin hasani Jakim Hakim Ramadan Ramadhan Ramadhani Ramayana Ramayama Sadal SITI rohani binti Mohamed red zaw organization Zuraidah Ibrahim Liyana Norida Ruwaida Zuraidah Ibrahim liyana Liana IANA ID IbrahimHelenaKimberley Burberry dana Kate Amanda Gigi Zhang yee Zuraidah Ibrahim Liyana Kate Amanda Gigi Zhang yee muyiddin yassin Muhyiddin yassin Suleiman suliaman Al fatihah Ri Ayatuddin Baharuddin Razaruddin Husain woo Kah Yee Kimberley Burberry dana Kate Amanda Gigi Zhang yee Siva Kumar. Kamalruddin Hassan Ghana Ghani Ghazi Dhaja Dhabi razaruddin Hussain Shah Kate army armada Gigi Zhang yee Zuraidah Ibrahim Liyana Norida Ruwaida Zuraidah Ibrahim liyana Norida Ruwaida Zuraidah Ibrahim Liyana Norida Ruwaida Zuraidah Ibrahim — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:D08:228A:F198:8C39:4A12:213D:A456 ( talk) 04:45, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Well I've recently been kicked off TVTropes, so maybe I'll start editing Wikipedia again. It's been a while since I've been to the Pendrell, so I think I may follow up. Nice to hear from you again! Serendi pod ous 10:32, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Fixing my errors deserves thanks, but the edit summaries are the icing on this cupcake. Thank you. CT55555 ( talk) 21:25, 22 June 2022 (UTC) |
{{ You've got mail}}
Please let me know if you hit any snags :) Serendi pod ous 18:03, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 10:02, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
The new [subscribe] button notifies people when someone replies to their comments. It helps newcomers get answers to their questions. People reply sooner. You can read the report. The Editing team is turning this tool on for everyone. You will be able to turn it off in your preferences.
– Whatamidoing (WMF) 23:35, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi, it's been awhile since we talked, I think? I mostly remember you as the person who inspired me to create my guestbook. Anyways, I saw your response to the NPP letter was "thanks but no". I was wondering if you would be willing to explain why? I'm mostly just curious, but I also try to listen to opposing viewpoints because I don't ever want to feel like I'm living in a "bubble" again. I think NPP could have more support, but I'm willing to listen to your perspective. Clovermoss (talk) 13:00, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
For WereSpielChequers! |
I hope all is well. I'd thought I'll show appreciation for all your hard work around here and for all your kindness! Best wishes! -- A.S. Brown ( talk) 07:00, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
On one very raw statistic, we seem to be getting an uptick in edits Wikipedia:Time Between Edits gives us the interval between every ten millionth edit, and at least a couple of pundits were expecting that to fall back a bit post COVID. The latest batch of ten million edits took the community just 52 days. That's looking more like the editing levels of 2010 than of 2019. Thoughts Iridescent or anyone else? Ϣere SpielChequers 14:18, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi WereSpielChequers, I have started a bureaucrat discussion for ScottishFinnishRadish's RfA. It can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ScottishFinnishRadish/Bureaucrat chat. Thanks in advance. Acalamari 01:43, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Is RFA looking like a driving test with a backseat crowded with test examiners arguing about the criteria for a test
an original by you or is it from someone else? I find it a great metaphor to describe RfA and when I use it in the future I want to properly attribute it. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk) 14:52, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
ScottishFinnishRadish had nothing to do with wikiHow, as you've indicated here [3]. I made a comparison with myself and my previous editing experience in the RfA, so maybe that's where you're getting that from? ScottishFinnishRadish's response to everything is best answered with Q6. Clovermoss (talk) 17:33, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello there. I am most grateful for your rating: many thanks. Vortexionio ( talk) 18:11, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello WereSpielChequers: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 23:49, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello, WereSpielChequers! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year!
Ozzie10aaaa (
talk) 15:09, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 ( talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} |
![]() |
Donner60 ( talk) 23:37, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Season's Greetings | |
Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Adoration of the Magi by Luca Signorelli is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod ( talk) 18:34, 22 December 2022 (UTC) |
Hello WereSpielChequers: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:15, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:15, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello WereSpielChequers: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, -- A.S. Brown ( talk) 04:12, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Bling | Content | Userboxen | Editcount | Talk | Guestbook |
![]() |
Happy New Year! |
Hello WereSpielChequers: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary
blisters. |
Thank you so much! Wishing you a most happy 2022! And thank for all your hard work and contributions around here. Best wishes! -- A.S. Brown ( talk) 07:58, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
A token of thanks
Hi WereSpielChequers! I've
nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk ~~~~~
|
![]() |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
WereSpielChequers,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–
Davey2010
Talk 00:22, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Nattes à chat ( talk) 22:00, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. / Johan (WMF)
18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Template:Welcome training Leeds has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
User:GKFX
talk 19:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, would you please revdel this pair of edits? Egsan Bacon ( talk) 00:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Happy bureaucratship anniversary! Hi WereSpielChequers! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for bureaucratship. Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC) |
![]() |
![]() | |
Nine years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, WereSpielChequers and bbb23. I had added a large amount of content to this article. Why did you delete it? You can re-write what I had written. You can use your vocabulary, but please keep the information, which is extremely important and helps enrich Wikipedia. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brightstarrrr ( talk • contribs) 21:24, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Happy First Edit Day! Hi WereSpielChequers! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 ( talk) 17:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC) |
![]() |
𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 ( talk) 17:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
On this. ip's only edit (added to a talk thread from 2014). Block too? Hope all goes well, Johnbod ( talk) 13:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for reviewing my speedy request on Kyla Carter. Just to add that this article has been created several times under slightly different names, and now it appears to have been created yet again, and moved from drafts into the main space by the creator who has a declared COI. The last time this was speedied (back then called Kyla carter), I believe it was done on the basis of the earlier AfD, and I just lazily referenced the same in this request; apologies. If it doesn't qualify for speedy, so be it, but it shouldn't IMO exist in the main space either, if only because of the COI. Could you please take another look at the history of this, not just under this exact name but also at Kyla carter? Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:50, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello WereSpielChequers.
Following a discussion at the Bureaucrats' noticeboard, the minimum activity requirements for bureaucrats have been updated to also include the the recently updated minimum editing requirements for administrators (i.e. at least 100 edits every 5 years). This will be enforced beginning in January 2023. Should you no longer wish to volunteer as a bureaucrat you may request removal at SRP and.or let us know at WP:BN.
Best regards, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Your input is requested at the freshly-created bureaucrat chat. Useight ( talk) 03:08, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at the 20 Wikipedias that participated in the test. You will be able to turn it off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.
Whatamidoing (WMF) 18:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I was hoping to seek out help with the New York State wiki page. I was being told I was being disruptive.
My concern is that it is potentially politically-motivated in a bit of a subdued understated way. In the "History" section, COVID 19 flag change" subsection, It directs criticism towards the state of NY (and Andrew Cuomo) about the state having 50% of the COVID cases (including court rulings against religious gathering restrictions; we all know that right wing media went off the rails over that policy.)
Anyway, all of this information is included, using the dubious source of Vox.
My attempt has been to temper this section with more.complete and relevant information to bring the argument back into proper context:
1) NYC is the most densely populated city in country, with the highest population, as well as the most daily visitors. No other US city comes close.
2) Population size, density, and movement of people plays a very significant role in the spread of viruses.
I've posted several sources, mostly from Pubmed, but it's considered "disruptive." Meanwhile, the entire section is maintained using Vox as a source.
My concern is the narrative that political extremists on media go to in omitting relevant information when making wild criticisms of certain places and certain politicians. And Wikipedia as an exclyclopedia, also omitting the same relevant information.
My latest source is this:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239687/
Look at the references in that source. They are many and varied. The main conclusion to be drawn is this:
" that population density has a significantly positive effect on the number of cases but not the number of deaths, as the latter is better explained by measures of preparedness. Plausible explanations are presented for the results to conclude that the “density paradox” is not really a paradox. This paper makes a contribution by shedding more light on a frequently debated issue by using a completely different, and more robust, statistical techniques and by providing results that may be helpful for health and urban planners."
The gover or of NY was in a very unique position of having NYC as the anchor of the Mid Atlantic megalopolis that spans from Virginia, up to New Hampshire along the entire Mid Atlantic seaboard, and therefore, unique measure needed to be taken for a major health crisis that uniquely affects such heavily urbanized areas.
Since I was unable to get anywhere with two users on the NY State page, I decided to find a way to file an official dispute. I found a page with a list of highly experienced editors that are recently active, and I decided to hit you up
Thank you. Nihilianth ( talk) 16:17, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
@werespielchequers , I'll check that out and leave it as a concern. Nihilianth ( talk) 19:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Can you please take a look at Futebul's activity at Kurmanc. It's a POV-article that should be a redirect (and more than one experienced editor has been involved) but Futebul and seemingly sock Hydralon keep reverting. -- Semsûrî ( talk) 09:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Dear CambridgeBayWeather,
I added the disambiguation page because if I do a Google search for "Antony Barnett Wikipedia" Google will not produce this page, it produces "Anthony Barnett (writer)".
In fact, after several months, I think Google has not even indexed the page.
how can this be solved? i'm guessing most people search for Wiki pages directly through Google. And even the most well phrased search will send searchers to the wrong page.
-Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christopher22500 ( talk • contribs) 15:33, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Elizabeth Chong siew Chu razaruddin hasani Jakim Hakim Ramadan Ramadhan Ramadhani Ramayana Ramayama Sadal SITI rohani binti Mohamed red zaw organization Zuraidah Ibrahim Liyana Norida Ruwaida Zuraidah Ibrahim liyana Liana IANA ID IbrahimHelenaKimberley Burberry dana Kate Amanda Gigi Zhang yee Zuraidah Ibrahim Liyana Kate Amanda Gigi Zhang yee muyiddin yassin Muhyiddin yassin Suleiman suliaman Al fatihah Ri Ayatuddin Baharuddin Razaruddin Husain woo Kah Yee Kimberley Burberry dana Kate Amanda Gigi Zhang yee Siva Kumar. Kamalruddin Hassan Ghana Ghani Ghazi Dhaja Dhabi razaruddin Hussain Shah Kate army armada Gigi Zhang yee Zuraidah Ibrahim Liyana Norida Ruwaida Zuraidah Ibrahim liyana Norida Ruwaida Zuraidah Ibrahim Liyana Norida Ruwaida Zuraidah Ibrahim — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:D08:228A:F198:8C39:4A12:213D:A456 ( talk) 04:45, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Well I've recently been kicked off TVTropes, so maybe I'll start editing Wikipedia again. It's been a while since I've been to the Pendrell, so I think I may follow up. Nice to hear from you again! Serendi pod ous 10:32, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Fixing my errors deserves thanks, but the edit summaries are the icing on this cupcake. Thank you. CT55555 ( talk) 21:25, 22 June 2022 (UTC) |
{{ You've got mail}}
Please let me know if you hit any snags :) Serendi pod ous 18:03, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 10:02, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
The new [subscribe] button notifies people when someone replies to their comments. It helps newcomers get answers to their questions. People reply sooner. You can read the report. The Editing team is turning this tool on for everyone. You will be able to turn it off in your preferences.
– Whatamidoing (WMF) 23:35, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi, it's been awhile since we talked, I think? I mostly remember you as the person who inspired me to create my guestbook. Anyways, I saw your response to the NPP letter was "thanks but no". I was wondering if you would be willing to explain why? I'm mostly just curious, but I also try to listen to opposing viewpoints because I don't ever want to feel like I'm living in a "bubble" again. I think NPP could have more support, but I'm willing to listen to your perspective. Clovermoss (talk) 13:00, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
For WereSpielChequers! |
I hope all is well. I'd thought I'll show appreciation for all your hard work around here and for all your kindness! Best wishes! -- A.S. Brown ( talk) 07:00, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
On one very raw statistic, we seem to be getting an uptick in edits Wikipedia:Time Between Edits gives us the interval between every ten millionth edit, and at least a couple of pundits were expecting that to fall back a bit post COVID. The latest batch of ten million edits took the community just 52 days. That's looking more like the editing levels of 2010 than of 2019. Thoughts Iridescent or anyone else? Ϣere SpielChequers 14:18, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi WereSpielChequers, I have started a bureaucrat discussion for ScottishFinnishRadish's RfA. It can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ScottishFinnishRadish/Bureaucrat chat. Thanks in advance. Acalamari 01:43, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Is RFA looking like a driving test with a backseat crowded with test examiners arguing about the criteria for a test
an original by you or is it from someone else? I find it a great metaphor to describe RfA and when I use it in the future I want to properly attribute it. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk) 14:52, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
ScottishFinnishRadish had nothing to do with wikiHow, as you've indicated here [3]. I made a comparison with myself and my previous editing experience in the RfA, so maybe that's where you're getting that from? ScottishFinnishRadish's response to everything is best answered with Q6. Clovermoss (talk) 17:33, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello there. I am most grateful for your rating: many thanks. Vortexionio ( talk) 18:11, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello WereSpielChequers: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 23:49, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello, WereSpielChequers! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year!
Ozzie10aaaa (
talk) 15:09, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 ( talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} |
![]() |
Donner60 ( talk) 23:37, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Season's Greetings | |
Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Adoration of the Magi by Luca Signorelli is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod ( talk) 18:34, 22 December 2022 (UTC) |
Hello WereSpielChequers: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:15, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:15, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello WereSpielChequers: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, -- A.S. Brown ( talk) 04:12, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |