Welcome!
Hello, We233ws, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
DavidOaks (
talk)
18:31, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. --
Gogo Dodo (
talk)
07:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Man. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. --
Boing! said Zebedee (
talk)
17:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Man, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Wikipedia is not censored for anyone, so stop removing this perfectly acceptable image, and stop your edit warring --
Boing! said Zebedee (
talk)
17:58, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Gogo Dodo (
talk)
20:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Hi. In the light of the current dispute regarding the inclusion of an image in the article Man, and the heated exchanges that have led to the need to temporarily protect the article, I have started an RFC at Talk:Man#RFC: image in article. Please do add your opinion, and hopefully we can achieve a policy-based consensus. -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 21:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
As one of the parties in the dispute, you can not decide for yourself that a consensus has been reached to remove material - especially as a consensus clearly has not been reached. You must wait for an uninvolved person, who is experienced with assessing consensus, to make the decision. Best regards, -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 08:10, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Dabomb87 (
talk)
03:07, 31 October 2010 (UTC)For continued edit warring through the form of sockpuppetry with this sock, Itiiti2itiitiitiitiitiitiiti ( talk · contribs), I have reblocked and extended your block to 2 weeks. Continued sockpuppetry and edit warring will result in an extended block. Elockid ( Talk) 04:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, We233ws, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
DavidOaks (
talk)
18:31, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. --
Gogo Dodo (
talk)
07:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Man. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. --
Boing! said Zebedee (
talk)
17:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Man, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Wikipedia is not censored for anyone, so stop removing this perfectly acceptable image, and stop your edit warring --
Boing! said Zebedee (
talk)
17:58, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Gogo Dodo (
talk)
20:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Hi. In the light of the current dispute regarding the inclusion of an image in the article Man, and the heated exchanges that have led to the need to temporarily protect the article, I have started an RFC at Talk:Man#RFC: image in article. Please do add your opinion, and hopefully we can achieve a policy-based consensus. -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 21:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
As one of the parties in the dispute, you can not decide for yourself that a consensus has been reached to remove material - especially as a consensus clearly has not been reached. You must wait for an uninvolved person, who is experienced with assessing consensus, to make the decision. Best regards, -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 08:10, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Dabomb87 (
talk)
03:07, 31 October 2010 (UTC)For continued edit warring through the form of sockpuppetry with this sock, Itiiti2itiitiitiitiitiitiiti ( talk · contribs), I have reblocked and extended your block to 2 weeks. Continued sockpuppetry and edit warring will result in an extended block. Elockid ( Talk) 04:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)