Dear Chris,

Thank you so much for reviewing my recent draft article. I appreciate your comments and will attempt to add more secondary sources. However, I do feel that my subject's notability was sufficiently established. The notability page to which you directed me lists 9 criteria, any one of which is sufficient to establish notability. Criterion 5 provides that (1) a "named chair appointment" at (2) a "major institution of higher education and research" establishes notability. In the second line of my article, I state, with corroborating source, that Jonathan Rosand "holds the J.P. Kistler Endowed Chair in Neurology at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)." According to Wikipedia article on Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH is "the original and largest teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School" and "conducts the largest hospital-based research program in the world." Does this not establish both that (1) Dr. Rosand holds an endowed chair and (2) he does so at a major institution of higher education and research?

Would it be sufficient to replace my current reference to Dr. Rosand's faculty page with a link to the MGH website awarding his current endowed chair position?

I would appreciate any additional input you have that would allow my article to meet Wikipedia's requirements.

Thank you very much! Neil Nhv2001 ( talk) 17:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• 173.169.139.115 ( talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Nearpod ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Good morning Chrisw80. Thank you for taking the time to review my submission. Can you please advise more on the comments and ways I can resolve? Many thanks, Jennifer

173.169.139.115 ( talk) 13:53, 2 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• Roberta Buoite Stella ( talk · contribs)
  • Draft:HighStep System ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Help regarding rejected article about the HighStep System Hello Chrisw80, First of all thank you for your feedback on my Wikipedia article about the HighStep System. As you can see, I have changed it very much since the first draft, adding the technical explanation about how the system works. The problem at the moment is that, while I can find sources that talk about it in general, the details are only contained in the book cited in the External resources, which, as I understood, is not a good reference because it was published by the company itself. Is there any other way in which you could suggest me to structure the article in order for it to respect the guidelines of Wikipedia? Any help would be much appreciated! Thanks a lot, -- Roberta Buoite Stella ( talk) 14:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Roberta Buoite Stella ( talk) 14:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• Curley Wolf ( talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Kirby Allen (Pittman) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Greetings User:Chrisw80,

I appreciate your review of this article, and I especially appreciate the details that you left to explain your conclusion.

As you probably know, I have put forth quite a bit of time and effort on this article, so it was nice to have you, and @ Onel5969:, and @ SwisterTwister: take time to review it.

I also appreciate the invitation by User:Onel5969 to the WP:Teahouse. I didn't get a response there, but I found the Teahouse to be interesting and educational.

A] At this time, I'm thinking the article is just a WP:SNOWBALL, and it appears that any further effort would be a waste of everyone's time.

B] However, I don't know if I should request deletion of the article, or if I should just let it set, hoping that a magic 'Citation' will appear, which seems quite unlikely.

C] And, I'm also unsure if I should delete the subject reviews from my talk page.

If you guys don't mind, I'd like to ask your advise about these matters, because I'm not sure what to do at this point.

Thanks to all of you! I do appreciate your time and your helpful consideration. Education is a good thing! :-)

Sincerely, Curley Wolf ( talk) 01:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Curley Wolf ( talk) 01:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello Chrisw80. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context ( CSD A1), content ( CSD A3), or significance ( CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at Krishna Hackster. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages ( G10), blatant nonsense ( G1), copyright violations ( G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes ( G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. IagoQnsi ( talk) 05:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi IagoQnsi, thanks for your warning template. I normally do wait, but my research found these: Krishna Kumar Mandal and Krishna hackster. As it had been created and speedied a couple times already, I was a little impatient. Chrisw80 ( talk) 05:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Ah, I saw Krishna Kumar Mandal, but I didn't realized they'd made another page of the exact same page. Good catch. - IagoQnsi ( talk) 05:42, 9 March 2016 (UTC) reply

No worries. I'll readily admit I was a little too quick on the trigger, even so. :) Best wishes! Chrisw80 ( talk) 05:47, 9 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Penny. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 10 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Your help & support is greatly appreciated.

Kind regards,

Deedeefleur ( talk) 22:52, 10 March 2016 (UTC) reply

You're welcome! Chrisw80 ( talk) 23:58, 10 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi Chris. Some references on /info/en/?search=DMACK were broken and i fixed them for a friend Kkimbero. I undid the last edit that Kkimbero did because the last edit she did made things worse. I made an additional edit and you can see that the references are now fixed. I hope this is OK. In any case, please do not make any further changes to this page without contacting Kkimbero and myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sca1111 ( talk • contribs)

Hello Sca1111, I reverted your edit because you broke a link in two places - you changed the URL for "www.newsandstar.co.uk" to "www.news & star.co.uk" in two places. Your additional edit did not make the same mistake, thankfully. Regarding contacting one of you before editing this article in future, kindly review Ownership of content. Please understand that I don't need to consult with you or Kkimbero's before editing any article. If I edit this article in future and you disagree with my edits, you are perfectly welcome to discuss the matter with me either here or on the article talk page. All articles are for everyone to edit, as long as the edits are constructive. Also, please remember to "sign" your talk page comments with ~~~~. Best wishes! Chrisw80 ( talk) 02:20, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Dear Chrisw80-

regarding the article www.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMACK

On 10 March, 2016, both you and a friend of mine who knows coding made edits to my references area on my above written article.

I believe now all references correctly link to their sources. However at least four or five are missing, is I had a new footnote number four each person in the key personnel section.

I don't know where they went, and I don't want to be busted by a Wikipediain, but I am a little at a loss of what to do.

I'm going out of town for a couple of days and will not have computer access, and I do not wish to return to find my whole article has been deleted.

Please, please if you can help me know what to to prevent deletion and fix footnotes.

I am greatly appreciative.

Kkimbero ( talk) 20:38, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello Kkimbero, I will look over your article when i get home later and see how it stands. If it looks in danger of deletion, i will preserve the article as a draft to avoid deletion. If memory serves, though, it didn't look as though that was a concern. Best wishes. Chrisw80 ( talk) 20:45, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Schottky Junction Solar Cells requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 ( talk) 10:23, 14 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ford Pinto. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Please stop deleating my wiki page its the wiki of Ned my supercomputer I'm making — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BDDE:1970:74C2:3BDB:7E15:DDE9 ( talk) 01:31, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello there, I reverted your edits because it appeared you were vandalizing an existing redirect page. I suggest you create your proposed article via the Article Wizard. Be aware, however, that all articles on Wikipedia need to be considered "notable". Please see WP:GNG for more information. If your software is not finished yet, then it is probably not ready for Wikipedia yet. Best wishes! Chrisw80 ( talk) 01:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

I used the Article Wizard — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BDDE:1970:74C2:3BDB:7E15:DDE9 ( talk) 01:50, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

No, you just added the Article Wizard comment tag to the top of it. Please actually use the article wizard to draft an article properly. Please follow the steps at WP:WIZARD to create a draft article. Chrisw80 ( talk) 01:58, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Chris, I have how added factual, neutral content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjs of edmonton ( talk • contribs) 02:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

I will let another reviewer take a look at your draft. However, I suggest you read Your First Article for more information. You haven't cited any sources (much less reliable sources) to support the notability of your software. Chrisw80 ( talk) 02:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Nik Richie (born Hooman Karamian,[1] February 12, 1979),[2] previously known as Corbin Grimes,[2] is an American blogger, author,[3] and Internet personality.[2] Richie is best known for his defamitory site TheDirty.com which he began in 2007 as DirtyScottsdale.com. Richie quotes third party content to enforce his defamitory comments against private individuals.

Chris, this is a fact. It's not a gossip site. Please let me know how you would word it different. He is in and out of court. That is not for gossip. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjs of edmonton ( talk • contribs) 02:18, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Responding on your talk page. Chrisw80 ( talk) 02:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi, Chris. The constructive tone of your message just minutes ago is appreciated. I dont' have an account because I'm no Wikipedia maven; I only by chance noticed that you had even left me a message. I didn't do a footnote because I thoguth my edits on Snider were common knowledge. (I worked in music in the 1970s-80s.) My edits were instigated by just having seen the video documentary (in which Snider, bandmates, manager, and record company exec all agreed on these facts) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIbqvwS1TcM . I hope you restore my edits, because the article was incorrect to the extent it omitted them and because they are the truth; however, I'm in no position to argue and I have "no dog in this fight"! So, do what you have to do, and thanks again for your civility. - Andy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.203.188 ( talk) 03:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello there Andy, thanks for your message. I appreciate the willingness to have a discussion. Just so you know, YouTube is rarely considered a reliable source on Wikipedia. Honestly, I think that article has a lot of problems with it regarding sourcing, I'll probably take another walk through it later to try and clean it up some more. If it's been covered by a reliable source, could you provide a link for it? Thanks for your time! Chrisw80 ( talk) 03:34, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

I reverted back to the sourced edits which were cut by user 2601:245:D001:7AC0:4CC0:CF70:A7C7:27C5 . It was already a sourced edit in the first place and user  2601:245:D001:7AC0:4CC0:CF70:A7C7:27C5  was the one eho vandalized it by removing it from Jackson's wiki.

Here is another video proving it https://www.instagram.com/p/6aJ8kakG8O/ 115.164.213.253 ( talk) 03:47, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Sorry, those aren't reliable sources. The article already suffers from reliable sourcing issues, please don't add more. Please see WP:RS for more information about what constitutes a reliable source. Thank you! Chrisw80 ( talk) 04:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Beepi. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Chrisw80, this is in response to your email to me, regarding my latest comment you have taken off. i have the above disease, and have had it for around 10 years. With so little information available anywhere about it's effects on the body, i have written about my time with it, in the hope of helping others on how it works. I realise this disease may effect others slightly differently. but my comments are just a rough but accurate guide on how it progresses. As time goes by, so my disease changes, and i want to describe these changes to benefit others. As i said, very little is known about this disease, and no research is been done as it's quite rare. I thought Wikipedia would be a good place where many people might learn about the actual process of how the disease works ?. The end result of this disease, according to my specialist, is the total disintegration of all infected joints, over a time period of 15 to 25 years. If you deem my comments as not fitting for your encyclopedia, then please erase my past comment. from Redrum56 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redrum56 ( talk • contribs) 16:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello Redrum56, welcome to Wikipedia! As someone with a rather rare medical condition myself, I believe I have some understanding about what you're saying about wanting other people to understand the disease a little better. We do have an article, Calcific Tendinitis, which might be a better place for information regarding Hydroxyapatite Crystal Disease - have you looked there? Your efforts are welcome, but I should probably explain a little more about Wikipedia and our guidelines for content. We do need all content to be sourced from "reliable sources". Please review our page WP:MEDRS for more information about what constitutes a reliable source in this context. I've also left a welcome message at your own user talk page with a variety of general information regarding Wikipedia for you to peruse at your leisure. Thank you for taking the time to leave me a message. Please let me know if you have any more questions, I'm happy to help. Chrisw80 ( talk) 17:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Anwar Agewan is deleted citing that the article do not pass general notability criteria but he is notable Gujarati language Author, biographer and editor. There may be problem with references but you should tag it with refimprove rather than deleting it. I was not even given a chance to defend the deletion. At least you should put it for discussion. The site you mentioned as Mirror site is not actually a mirror site but the site is owned by Gujarati Sahitya Parishad which donated their short biographies of Authors to Gujarati Wikipedia. The article was translation of the Gujarati article citing GSP as its source. May be more refs can be found and edited but please restore the article as he is important literary person in Gujarati language. Ping me if any questions. Regards, - Nizil ( talk) 09:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello Nizil Shah, thank you for taking the time to write to me on my talk page. I also want to thank you sincerely for taking time to translate articles from the Gujarati Wikipedia. The Anwar Agewan article had a wide variety of problems, similar to the Gujarati Wikipedia article. Please understand that guidelines and policies differ amongst the many Wikipedia language sites, so an article that may be acceptable on Gujarati Wikipedia, may not be acceptable here. My advice to you, since you feel strongly about this article being included, is to create a Draft using the Article Wizard for review. You might also want to read WP:AUTHOR for information regarding what constitutes notability for an author on English Wikipedia. Again, I appreciate you taking the time to write to me about this. Please let me know if there's anything else I can do to help. Chrisw80 ( talk) 18:55, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your prompt reply. I feel that I was not given a chance to defend it before deletion. I think the article should be restored because the person is notable as per criteria IMO. I do understand that Notability criteria differ per language sites. If you think is not notable enough than the article should be restored and than moved to Draft so I do not have to rewrite it entirely. I will try to improve it further with more citations. I still think article has problem of citations, not of notability. So please restore it and tag it with refimprove OR restore it and move it to Draft if you feel it is not notable. Regards,- Nizil ( talk) 19:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi, you sent me a message regarding my edit to the article about Aojiru. The sentence in the article states that it is "a Japanese vegetable drink most commonly made from kale." As a frequent consumer of aojiru over the years, I made the edit because it is very common to find the beverage made primarily with barley grass and other ingredients such as tea leaves.

The best citation that I can offer online would be Amazon's product page-- there's kale-based aojiru to order, but you would find many more barley grass-based products. It's more difficult to prove, but the product selection in Amazon is similar to a typical grocery store or pharmacy in Japan. http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_c_0_5?url=search-alias%3Dhpc&field-keywords=aojiru&sprefix=aojiru%2Caps%2C241

Here is also an article explaining the history of Aojiru. The popularity of the drink rose with the introduction of kale, but as the article states, kale was not the main ingredient when it was originally created. http://servelle.net/japan/03niche_products_-_menu/aojiru_green_juice.html

This article explains that young barley grass-based aojiru was introduced in 1969. http://aojiruusa.com/

Considering the prevalence of barley grass-based aojiru, stating that kale is the most common ingredient in the beverage would be misleading for someone who is interested in the product for consumption or for research. Perhaps the Wikipedia article should read, "a Japanese vegetable drink commonly made from kale, young barley grass or green tea leaves."

Just stating my reasons for editing. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DC789 ( talk • contribs) 20:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello DC789, thanks for your message. I apologize for not getting back to you sooner. This page seems to talk about both ingredients. I agree with your suggested phrase except that I don't see enough solid sources for the addition of green tea leaves, at least at a glance. I've gone ahead and made the edit, and sourced it appropriately. Please let me know what you think. Chrisw80 ( talk) 03:07, 30 March 2016 (UTC) reply