Thank you for your contributions; you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles, see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting pages, visit the manual of style. For general questions, go to Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ; if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.
Here are some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
Be bold in updating pages! You can find instantaneous help any time simply by typing {{help}} anywhere on your own
user or user talk page.
You can find me at my
user page or
talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.
Jo e I 17:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Just a friendly suggestion - can you please post new talk page items at the bottom of the page, and sign them with four tildes rather than copying an old signature? Thanks! BTW, thanks for your contributions! Jminthorne ( talk) 15:03, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello Voiceofreason01, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to LG KG290 has been removed. It was removed by DGG with the following edit summary '(we usually merge these to a suitable combination article or list)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with DGG before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot ( talk) 20:49, 2 September 2009 (UTC) ( Learn how to opt out of these messages)
Are you aware of this notice board? You might, for instance, want to ask others there to take a look at Unexplained human mutilation, Dougweller ( talk) 18:28, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
I've been applauding your work on the Moon landing article, and deleted a previous comment which was actually meant for another editor, which got pasted onto your talk page by mistake. Apologies for that. Best regards. -- Oliver Twisted (Talk) (Stuff) 03:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
When you are changing page titles, as you did with Outline of recreational number theory-> List of recreational number theory topics, it is better to use Wikipedia's page move utility rather than doing a cut-and-paste move. Reasons are:
See Help:Moving a page for instructions. Gandalf61 ( talk) 13:03, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed that a few times you've said npov (for neutral POV) when I think you mean nNPOV (non-NPOV, or just POV). Just a heads up! Verbal chat 16:25, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Web Bot is another way to try to tap into the "global conciousness" using technology; how is it not a suitable "See also" link for the Global Consciousness Project? The two projects have been compared in the Jerusalem Post: [1]. Perhaps you didn't realise that "Web Bot" is a specific project, and not a generic name for a web spider? Fences& Windows 19:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
This subject is more appropriately discussed on the article talk page, I have responded there. Voiceofreason01 ( talk) 19:55, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
While looking for items that needed following up on on the Sustainability talk page, I noticed a couple of recent posts by you. The first one [2] was a masterpiece of wikietiquette, IMO. You made your points in the form of observations; clearly and fairly. I especially liked your reference to the "Beware of the tigers" essay. By doing this you gave some feedback in a way that was both humourous and compassionate, IMO. I hadn't seen that essay, but it is spot on.
The more recent post by you wasn't quite as neutral, but I understand your frustration. I would like to pursue your concerns as I think that they are important for the GA assessment. One of the things I was going to do before things went sideways was get the opinion of a peer reviewer about the lead. I still intend to do that. Now things are settling down a bit (with Skip having agreed to stay away from the article for awhile, AdenR warned about edit warring, and the article protected) so we can get back to it. I hope that you will continue editing on the Sustainability page. We need good editors there. Sunray ( talk) 02:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for you feedback regarding my edits of the Web Bot entry. As you have pointed out, I am new again to Wikipedia. I will review the documents you suggested before making further edits. Mcmarturano ( talk) 00:51, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Exactly how does this photo look ok? It's a picture of some sort of plastic mannequin. -- Xyzzyplugh ( talk) 19:24, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
I have copied this conversation and replied on the article talk page here since that is the more appropriate place to be discussing this. Voiceofreason01 ( talk) 20:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Shep Talk 16:20, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. I would appreciate it if you could visit Talk:Muhammad. The article, Muhammad, has changed in a significant way since it originally passed WP:GA several years ago. It now states in the opening paragraph that Mohammad is the Founder of Islam and has relegated to a note at the end of the article that Muslims, themselves don't believe this. I have started a discussion on the talk page concerning this and would value your input. Thanks so much. Veritycheck ( talk) 21:52, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bad sex in literature. Since you had some involvement with the Bad sex in literature redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Voiceofreason01. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Firefangledfeathers 15:30, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions; you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles, see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting pages, visit the manual of style. For general questions, go to Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ; if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.
Here are some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
Be bold in updating pages! You can find instantaneous help any time simply by typing {{help}} anywhere on your own
user or user talk page.
You can find me at my
user page or
talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.
Jo e I 17:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Just a friendly suggestion - can you please post new talk page items at the bottom of the page, and sign them with four tildes rather than copying an old signature? Thanks! BTW, thanks for your contributions! Jminthorne ( talk) 15:03, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello Voiceofreason01, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to LG KG290 has been removed. It was removed by DGG with the following edit summary '(we usually merge these to a suitable combination article or list)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with DGG before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot ( talk) 20:49, 2 September 2009 (UTC) ( Learn how to opt out of these messages)
Are you aware of this notice board? You might, for instance, want to ask others there to take a look at Unexplained human mutilation, Dougweller ( talk) 18:28, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
I've been applauding your work on the Moon landing article, and deleted a previous comment which was actually meant for another editor, which got pasted onto your talk page by mistake. Apologies for that. Best regards. -- Oliver Twisted (Talk) (Stuff) 03:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
When you are changing page titles, as you did with Outline of recreational number theory-> List of recreational number theory topics, it is better to use Wikipedia's page move utility rather than doing a cut-and-paste move. Reasons are:
See Help:Moving a page for instructions. Gandalf61 ( talk) 13:03, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed that a few times you've said npov (for neutral POV) when I think you mean nNPOV (non-NPOV, or just POV). Just a heads up! Verbal chat 16:25, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Web Bot is another way to try to tap into the "global conciousness" using technology; how is it not a suitable "See also" link for the Global Consciousness Project? The two projects have been compared in the Jerusalem Post: [1]. Perhaps you didn't realise that "Web Bot" is a specific project, and not a generic name for a web spider? Fences& Windows 19:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
This subject is more appropriately discussed on the article talk page, I have responded there. Voiceofreason01 ( talk) 19:55, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
While looking for items that needed following up on on the Sustainability talk page, I noticed a couple of recent posts by you. The first one [2] was a masterpiece of wikietiquette, IMO. You made your points in the form of observations; clearly and fairly. I especially liked your reference to the "Beware of the tigers" essay. By doing this you gave some feedback in a way that was both humourous and compassionate, IMO. I hadn't seen that essay, but it is spot on.
The more recent post by you wasn't quite as neutral, but I understand your frustration. I would like to pursue your concerns as I think that they are important for the GA assessment. One of the things I was going to do before things went sideways was get the opinion of a peer reviewer about the lead. I still intend to do that. Now things are settling down a bit (with Skip having agreed to stay away from the article for awhile, AdenR warned about edit warring, and the article protected) so we can get back to it. I hope that you will continue editing on the Sustainability page. We need good editors there. Sunray ( talk) 02:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for you feedback regarding my edits of the Web Bot entry. As you have pointed out, I am new again to Wikipedia. I will review the documents you suggested before making further edits. Mcmarturano ( talk) 00:51, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Exactly how does this photo look ok? It's a picture of some sort of plastic mannequin. -- Xyzzyplugh ( talk) 19:24, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
I have copied this conversation and replied on the article talk page here since that is the more appropriate place to be discussing this. Voiceofreason01 ( talk) 20:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Shep Talk 16:20, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. I would appreciate it if you could visit Talk:Muhammad. The article, Muhammad, has changed in a significant way since it originally passed WP:GA several years ago. It now states in the opening paragraph that Mohammad is the Founder of Islam and has relegated to a note at the end of the article that Muslims, themselves don't believe this. I have started a discussion on the talk page concerning this and would value your input. Thanks so much. Veritycheck ( talk) 21:52, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bad sex in literature. Since you had some involvement with the Bad sex in literature redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Voiceofreason01. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Firefangledfeathers 15:30, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)