![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Modifying an original users comment isn't the best decision. If you would like to create a new ANI, or raise the issue there. Changing a users post isn't the best. If you would like to create a new report at ANI by all means go ahead.
However the proposal has nothing to do with this, in fact multiple users have told you to stop trying to state something on a user without solid diffs, and to stop stating things on users motives "votes" as you stated. Thanks. Des Vallee ( talk) 06:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Vincentvikram,
Please do not edit an archived talk page or noticeboard. If you feel that a case was archived prematurely, please unarchive the entire complaint and repost it on ANI. There is no reason to be adding new material to a closed case in the archives. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 05:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Please see the link here to the India Today article. Para 6. The reference was explained in another user's edit summary too. 115.96.29.204 ( talk) 21:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
The only block currently affecting that individual IP is a partial-block on the /34 range, which is a really big range; a full block on the range would cause a lot of "collateral damage" (i.e., prevent good-faith edits from many other users). We can easily block that individual IP, or a smaller range (like a /64 range) without touching the partial-block on /34. At this time, I'm only seeing 3 bad edits coming from the individual (and the corresponding /64 range). OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Al Capone on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination, and at
Talk:Aimery of Cyprus on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:12, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Vincent, starting on 21 December you have posted demeaning and inaccurate information about me on ANI forums. You didn't provide any evidence to back them up. Please stop. I have offered to discuss your grievances several times but you've refused just as often. I can't keep anyone from liking or disliking me, but such feelings should not be the motivation for influencing ANI discussions and shopping for blocks. Thank you. Saflieni ( talk) 23:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence. Serious accusations require serious evidence, usually in the form of diffs and links.Saflieni ( talk) 08:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Get off my talk page, Saflieni! Vikram Vincent 08:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Draft:WP:Yes Marxism-Leninism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:WP:Yes Marxism-Leninism and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
Draft:WP:Yes Marxism-Leninism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Crossroads
-talk-
08:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Mccapra ( talk) 18:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Vikram Vincent 18:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Modifying an original users comment isn't the best decision. If you would like to create a new ANI, or raise the issue there. Changing a users post isn't the best. If you would like to create a new report at ANI by all means go ahead.
However the proposal has nothing to do with this, in fact multiple users have told you to stop trying to state something on a user without solid diffs, and to stop stating things on users motives "votes" as you stated. Thanks. Des Vallee ( talk) 06:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Vincentvikram,
Please do not edit an archived talk page or noticeboard. If you feel that a case was archived prematurely, please unarchive the entire complaint and repost it on ANI. There is no reason to be adding new material to a closed case in the archives. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 05:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Please see the link here to the India Today article. Para 6. The reference was explained in another user's edit summary too. 115.96.29.204 ( talk) 21:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
The only block currently affecting that individual IP is a partial-block on the /34 range, which is a really big range; a full block on the range would cause a lot of "collateral damage" (i.e., prevent good-faith edits from many other users). We can easily block that individual IP, or a smaller range (like a /64 range) without touching the partial-block on /34. At this time, I'm only seeing 3 bad edits coming from the individual (and the corresponding /64 range). OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Al Capone on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination, and at
Talk:Aimery of Cyprus on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:12, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Vincent, starting on 21 December you have posted demeaning and inaccurate information about me on ANI forums. You didn't provide any evidence to back them up. Please stop. I have offered to discuss your grievances several times but you've refused just as often. I can't keep anyone from liking or disliking me, but such feelings should not be the motivation for influencing ANI discussions and shopping for blocks. Thank you. Saflieni ( talk) 23:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence. Serious accusations require serious evidence, usually in the form of diffs and links.Saflieni ( talk) 08:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Get off my talk page, Saflieni! Vikram Vincent 08:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Draft:WP:Yes Marxism-Leninism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:WP:Yes Marxism-Leninism and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
Draft:WP:Yes Marxism-Leninism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Crossroads
-talk-
08:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Mccapra ( talk) 18:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Vikram Vincent 18:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)