You seem to be destroying this page. NobiliAddict ( talk) 15:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
The language of this website is English. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/seem#Usage_notes VictorVVV ( talk) 16:19, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Could you give your opinion here? 70.253.87.253 ( talk) 21:58, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
I'm not confident enough in my English to take part in this debate. VictorVVV ( talk) 23:22, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Rather than saying references are provided in the linked article, you should provide relevant references in the article. Green Giant ( talk) 04:12, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Yes, the version on my talk page would be better than what is now in the article - I think your recent edits have made it worse. I think the NYT article supports the word "alleged" in front of "risks", but not in front to "sidewalk". It would be better to remove the reference to "information" altogether. St Anselm ( talk) 02:25, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
I am afraid you are edit warring on the
Abortion clinic article, and with
this edit you have broken the
one-revert rule. I suggest that you self-revert and restore the "known as" phrase.
St
Anselm (
talk)
19:23, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
You seem to be destroying this page. NobiliAddict ( talk) 15:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
The language of this website is English. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/seem#Usage_notes VictorVVV ( talk) 16:19, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Could you give your opinion here? 70.253.87.253 ( talk) 21:58, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
I'm not confident enough in my English to take part in this debate. VictorVVV ( talk) 23:22, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Rather than saying references are provided in the linked article, you should provide relevant references in the article. Green Giant ( talk) 04:12, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Yes, the version on my talk page would be better than what is now in the article - I think your recent edits have made it worse. I think the NYT article supports the word "alleged" in front of "risks", but not in front to "sidewalk". It would be better to remove the reference to "information" altogether. St Anselm ( talk) 02:25, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
I am afraid you are edit warring on the
Abortion clinic article, and with
this edit you have broken the
one-revert rule. I suggest that you self-revert and restore the "known as" phrase.
St
Anselm (
talk)
19:23, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)