An article you recently created,
Avarse, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider)
11:12, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
But most of our culture was oral, this is the only way to keep it alive, else it will be lost. Vicky4197 ( talk) 07:15, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
LukeEmily ( talk) 08:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 ( talk) 18:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Krishnadevaraya. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 ( talk) 18:19, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Barkur, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk)
20:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Cyberanthropologist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
Cyberanthropologist (
talk)
09:45, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Cyberanthropologist (
talk •
contribs)
10:28, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Cyberanthropologist (
talk •
contribs)
11:06, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Bunt (community). — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Cyberanthropologist (
talk •
contribs)
11:28, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Vicky4197 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Deletion or sourced content at Bunt (community) page despite repeated warning (vandalised past 4th warning). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberanthropologist ( talk • contribs) 11:51, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Kuruba.
DMacks (
talk)
11:26, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
331dot (
talk)
12:57, 8 May 2021 (UTC)I have blocked you from the Bunt article due to your persistent edit warring against consensus. If you wish to change the consensus, use the talk page. The blocks will get longer and broader should edit warring continue. 331dot ( talk) 13:00, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
You are also at risk of having discretionary sanctions imposed on you if you persist in being disruptive in India related topics(see the notice above). 331dot ( talk) 13:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
10:05, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Vicky4197. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Avarse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 16:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Avarse, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider)
11:12, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
But most of our culture was oral, this is the only way to keep it alive, else it will be lost. Vicky4197 ( talk) 07:15, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
LukeEmily ( talk) 08:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 ( talk) 18:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Krishnadevaraya. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 ( talk) 18:19, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Barkur, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk)
20:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Cyberanthropologist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
Cyberanthropologist (
talk)
09:45, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Cyberanthropologist (
talk •
contribs)
10:28, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Cyberanthropologist (
talk •
contribs)
11:06, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Bunt (community). — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Cyberanthropologist (
talk •
contribs)
11:28, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Vicky4197 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Deletion or sourced content at Bunt (community) page despite repeated warning (vandalised past 4th warning). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberanthropologist ( talk • contribs) 11:51, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Kuruba.
DMacks (
talk)
11:26, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
331dot (
talk)
12:57, 8 May 2021 (UTC)I have blocked you from the Bunt article due to your persistent edit warring against consensus. If you wish to change the consensus, use the talk page. The blocks will get longer and broader should edit warring continue. 331dot ( talk) 13:00, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
You are also at risk of having discretionary sanctions imposed on you if you persist in being disruptive in India related topics(see the notice above). 331dot ( talk) 13:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
10:05, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Vicky4197. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Avarse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 16:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)