Hello, Verystrict1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 20:38, 24 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 20:38, 24 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello! Verystrict1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Cows of Ausgloch, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 02:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello Verystrict1. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled " The Cows of Ausgloch".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:The Cows of Ausgloch}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 20:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NickW557 was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nick— ^Contact/ _Contribs 04:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC) reply

The article Chris stuckmann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All sources are primary sources or database, no in-depth independent coverage. Probably not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 03:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC) reply

• Very, what we need are good sources. This means sources that are all of the following:

1. Independent - they don't exist to promote Stuckmann's work
2. Reliable - they have a reputation for fact-checking, and promptly correct errors when discovered
3. In-depth - the source is about Stuckmann, not one that simply mentions him in passing, and not one about a movie.

• None of the sources you have provided come close to meeting those standards. In fact, one of them doesn't even have Stuckmann's name in it at all.
• Please add such sources to the article. Thank you, Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 04:11, 23 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, Verystrict1. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Chris stuckmann, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. FindMeLost ( talk) 05:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Doge of Venice has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Doge of Venice was changed by Verystrict1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907435 on 2015-11-05T19:41:14+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 19:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Magic in Harry Potter. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Magic in Harry Potter was changed by Verystrict1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882337 on 2015-11-05T19:43:44+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 19:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Cena, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: John Cena was changed by Verystrict1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909763 on 2015-11-05T20:05:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 20:05, 5 November 2015 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2008.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2008 was changed by Verystrict1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2015-11-05T20:08:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 20:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Ed ( Edgar181) 20:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC) reply