Hello, I'm
Yoshi24517. I noticed that in
this edit to
OGUsers, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Yoshi24517 (
Chat) (Online)
23:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
OGUsers, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Yoshi24517 (
Chat) (Online)
00:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at OGUsers. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 02:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
V.jonesy - Please stop re-instating your edit to OGUsers where you remove content from the page. You need to discuss your changes on the article's talk page (located here), and explain exactly why you believe the content to be "blatant slander and false information to vandalize the page" (as you stated above). In looking at the content, I don't see any text that suggests that the information is such. Continuing to revert the page back to your preferred version will cause you to be blocked for edit warring. Speaking of edit warring...
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 02:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
BusterD (
talk)
23:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)V.jonesy ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am not edit warring, they are edit warring with me. I am providing proper edits and they refuse to quit making new accounts and undo them to promote a website unrelated to the wiki in question. You can check the talk page of that wiki and see we have discussed this. V.jonesy ( talk) 02:20, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It's a good thing I wasn't consuming any beverage when I read the first line of your request. While I admit that there are some people who, in real life, could start a fight with an empty room, and some of them do edit Wikipedia, like sex it always takes two to edit war. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:35, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, I'm
Yoshi24517. I noticed that in
this edit to
OGUsers, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Yoshi24517 (
Chat) (Online)
23:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
OGUsers, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Yoshi24517 (
Chat) (Online)
00:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at OGUsers. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 02:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
V.jonesy - Please stop re-instating your edit to OGUsers where you remove content from the page. You need to discuss your changes on the article's talk page (located here), and explain exactly why you believe the content to be "blatant slander and false information to vandalize the page" (as you stated above). In looking at the content, I don't see any text that suggests that the information is such. Continuing to revert the page back to your preferred version will cause you to be blocked for edit warring. Speaking of edit warring...
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 02:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
BusterD (
talk)
23:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)V.jonesy ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am not edit warring, they are edit warring with me. I am providing proper edits and they refuse to quit making new accounts and undo them to promote a website unrelated to the wiki in question. You can check the talk page of that wiki and see we have discussed this. V.jonesy ( talk) 02:20, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It's a good thing I wasn't consuming any beverage when I read the first line of your request. While I admit that there are some people who, in real life, could start a fight with an empty room, and some of them do edit Wikipedia, like sex it always takes two to edit war. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:35, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.