Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to RT (TV network)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flyer22 ( talk) 09:36, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there! Urgup-tur,
you are invited to
The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please
join us!
I JethroBT (
I'm a Co-op mentor)
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 17:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC) |
Some of your edits are, using your words, ridiculous:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alentejo - NUTSII, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santarém. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to RT (TV network). While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Iryna Harpy ( talk) 06:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm not too sure about adding economic unions but I request that you also add SAARC when you get the time. Thanks. Filpro ( talk) 03:09, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Continental Portugal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estremadura. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Subtropical-man. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! You changes break some rules of Wikipedia, including Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:CYCLE, Wikipedia:Consensus. Your new changes may not break any rules of Wikipedia and also, must to be consensus for new changes. It also relates to image of File:Potential Superpowers.svg. You can have your own opinion, but you have no right to override graphic according to their own opinion, without consensus. This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time (if you don't stop pushing that changes), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Fine, both of us will get blocked. Fine, per WP:CONSENSUS you can't force changes upon a page and then say it should be discussed.. As any rationale person would understand, if you meet opposition you discuss first and then change, not force change and then discuss.. Easy. -- TIAYN ( talk) 23:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Please, stop removing opinion polls from Portuguese legislative election, 2015. Portugal is in electoral campaign now, so it's all but normal that pollsters conduct many more opinion polls than before. But even if it wasn't an electoral campaign, we are here to report what it's published, not to decide which opinion polls are included and which not just because we may not like the results. Impru20 ( talk) 08:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Opinion polling in the Canadian federal election, 2015, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:07, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Portuguese legislative election, 2015, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Impru20 ( talk) 18:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Portuguese legislative election, 2015. RA0808 talk contribs 20:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Floquenbeam (
talk)
20:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)"Indefinitely" doesn't mean "forever", but it does mean "until you can convince an admin that you're going to change the way you act". -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 20:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to RT (TV network)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flyer22 ( talk) 09:36, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there! Urgup-tur,
you are invited to
The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please
join us!
I JethroBT (
I'm a Co-op mentor)
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 17:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC) |
Some of your edits are, using your words, ridiculous:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alentejo - NUTSII, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santarém. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to RT (TV network). While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Iryna Harpy ( talk) 06:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm not too sure about adding economic unions but I request that you also add SAARC when you get the time. Thanks. Filpro ( talk) 03:09, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Continental Portugal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estremadura. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Subtropical-man. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! You changes break some rules of Wikipedia, including Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:CYCLE, Wikipedia:Consensus. Your new changes may not break any rules of Wikipedia and also, must to be consensus for new changes. It also relates to image of File:Potential Superpowers.svg. You can have your own opinion, but you have no right to override graphic according to their own opinion, without consensus. This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time (if you don't stop pushing that changes), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Fine, both of us will get blocked. Fine, per WP:CONSENSUS you can't force changes upon a page and then say it should be discussed.. As any rationale person would understand, if you meet opposition you discuss first and then change, not force change and then discuss.. Easy. -- TIAYN ( talk) 23:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Please, stop removing opinion polls from Portuguese legislative election, 2015. Portugal is in electoral campaign now, so it's all but normal that pollsters conduct many more opinion polls than before. But even if it wasn't an electoral campaign, we are here to report what it's published, not to decide which opinion polls are included and which not just because we may not like the results. Impru20 ( talk) 08:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Opinion polling in the Canadian federal election, 2015, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:07, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Portuguese legislative election, 2015, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Impru20 ( talk) 18:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Portuguese legislative election, 2015. RA0808 talk contribs 20:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Floquenbeam (
talk)
20:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)"Indefinitely" doesn't mean "forever", but it does mean "until you can convince an admin that you're going to change the way you act". -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 20:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)