Hello, Underwoods Witch, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on
my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!
HiLo48 (
talk)
05:44, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Please read wp:not and wp:spa. Slatersteven ( talk) 11:12, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Lourdes
10:13, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Underwoods Witch ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I apologize if I made men feel uncomfortable by calling them out in their safe space. As a woman, I will know better than to speak up when men are speaking, per Wikipedia policy i guess. Underwoods Witch ( talk) 15:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Obvious troll is obvious. WP:GAB explains how to write an unblock request in a manner that is not so obviously inappropriate. Yamla ( talk) 16:10, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I support the unblocking of this editor. I do not see a progressive series of warnings about any of the behaviors cited by the blocking admin. Blocking someone who has received no formal warnings at all seems extreme. Skyerise ( talk) 16:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Horse Eye's Back: Im currently banned for replying to a user who called me emotional. Why are you pinging me to mock me on the Witchcraft article talk page? I'm already blocked, have fun not at my expense. Underwoods Witch ( talk) 15:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Underwoods Witch ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I appear to have been blocked after no discussion, followed immediately by another uninvolved editor jumping in to mock me. If unblocked I will avoid religious topics, and not let people know I'm a woman, to help keep things calm. Were there links to policies i should have read, could someone provide these to me? Underwoods Witch ( talk) 17:00, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Perhaps WP:CIVIL and WP:BATTLEGROUND for starters. You haven't been asked to hide that you are a woman. There isn't a requirement for a discussion before a block, and I think it would be a bad idea for there to be one now. Agreeing to avoid the topic area is a start, but we will then need to know what edits you will make instead. 331dot ( talk) 19:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Underwoods Witch ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
To answer 331dot, I would mostly copy edit in areas related to food. Check out my most recent edits before my block. They are entirely non controversial and about food and related areas. Again, I would stay away from religious topics or anything that seems like more argument than article fixing Underwoods Witch ( talk) 05:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I am happy to be able to give you another chance. As you can see below, this is done with the agreement of the administrators who declined your previous unblock requests, and of Lourdes (particularly significant, as she blocked you in the first place). Welcome back to contributing you Wikipedia; I hope you will now have a successful time doing so. JBW ( talk) 15:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
To help administrators evaluate your unblock request, please answer the following questions below:
Thanks, Z1720 ( talk) 18:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Virtuous Pedophiles. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- dsprc [talk] 03:52, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Hello, Underwoods Witch, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on
my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!
HiLo48 (
talk)
05:44, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Please read wp:not and wp:spa. Slatersteven ( talk) 11:12, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Lourdes
10:13, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Underwoods Witch ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I apologize if I made men feel uncomfortable by calling them out in their safe space. As a woman, I will know better than to speak up when men are speaking, per Wikipedia policy i guess. Underwoods Witch ( talk) 15:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Obvious troll is obvious. WP:GAB explains how to write an unblock request in a manner that is not so obviously inappropriate. Yamla ( talk) 16:10, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I support the unblocking of this editor. I do not see a progressive series of warnings about any of the behaviors cited by the blocking admin. Blocking someone who has received no formal warnings at all seems extreme. Skyerise ( talk) 16:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Horse Eye's Back: Im currently banned for replying to a user who called me emotional. Why are you pinging me to mock me on the Witchcraft article talk page? I'm already blocked, have fun not at my expense. Underwoods Witch ( talk) 15:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Underwoods Witch ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I appear to have been blocked after no discussion, followed immediately by another uninvolved editor jumping in to mock me. If unblocked I will avoid religious topics, and not let people know I'm a woman, to help keep things calm. Were there links to policies i should have read, could someone provide these to me? Underwoods Witch ( talk) 17:00, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Perhaps WP:CIVIL and WP:BATTLEGROUND for starters. You haven't been asked to hide that you are a woman. There isn't a requirement for a discussion before a block, and I think it would be a bad idea for there to be one now. Agreeing to avoid the topic area is a start, but we will then need to know what edits you will make instead. 331dot ( talk) 19:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Underwoods Witch ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
To answer 331dot, I would mostly copy edit in areas related to food. Check out my most recent edits before my block. They are entirely non controversial and about food and related areas. Again, I would stay away from religious topics or anything that seems like more argument than article fixing Underwoods Witch ( talk) 05:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I am happy to be able to give you another chance. As you can see below, this is done with the agreement of the administrators who declined your previous unblock requests, and of Lourdes (particularly significant, as she blocked you in the first place). Welcome back to contributing you Wikipedia; I hope you will now have a successful time doing so. JBW ( talk) 15:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
To help administrators evaluate your unblock request, please answer the following questions below:
Thanks, Z1720 ( talk) 18:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Virtuous Pedophiles. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- dsprc [talk] 03:52, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.