|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Rickie Lambert has been reverted.
Your edit
here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s):
http://ricardolambertini.weebly.com.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk) 16:59, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit that you made to the page
Portsmouth F.C. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the
sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.
10metreh (
talk) 17:55, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Portsmouth F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Portsmouth F.C. was changed by Unclebert10 (u) (t) deleting 15987 characters on 2010-08-23T17:57:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 17:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with
this edit to
Portsmouth F.C.. If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing.
Logan
Talk
Contributions 17:59, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Portsmouth F.C., you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found
here. Thank you.
MJ94 (
talk) 18:04, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Unclebert10 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
sorry,it will be a one off,you americans dont understand UK football rivalry.
Decline reason:
No grounds for unblock provided; and hooliganism is unwelcome on Wikipedia. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 15:36, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unclebert10 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm not here to vandilize everything and the reason I think the block is unfair is because it was only performed on one article.
Decline reason:
There is no "sports rivalry" exception to our vandalism policies. You also appear to have edited other articles unconstructively. Kuru (talk) 16:41, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
What about the vandalism also done on Taunton School [1] and Rickie Lambert [2]? – MuZemike 16:37, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Unclebert10 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
please remember,another declined appeal is another person off wikipedia.I hope this changes your thoughts.
Decline reason:
Yes, it is, but we won't miss a vandal. Additionally, your unblock reason does not address why you were blocked. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 16:56, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unclebert10 ( talk) 16:52, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Unclebert10 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
will you bloody shut up idiots,anyway it was a right winger who started this crap. Unclebert10 ( talk) 17:04, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
That's as may be, but has nothing to do with your block. And, since your edits and unblock requests here make it clear that you have no intention of editing within our policies - especially the ones that don't permit blanking articles for rival football clubs - I've removed your ability to edit this page. You may appeal your block via e-mail, as per our guide to appealing blocks, if you wish. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 17:20, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Rickie Lambert has been reverted.
Your edit
here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s):
http://ricardolambertini.weebly.com.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk) 16:59, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit that you made to the page
Portsmouth F.C. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the
sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.
10metreh (
talk) 17:55, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Portsmouth F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Portsmouth F.C. was changed by Unclebert10 (u) (t) deleting 15987 characters on 2010-08-23T17:57:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 17:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with
this edit to
Portsmouth F.C.. If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing.
Logan
Talk
Contributions 17:59, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Portsmouth F.C., you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found
here. Thank you.
MJ94 (
talk) 18:04, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Unclebert10 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
sorry,it will be a one off,you americans dont understand UK football rivalry.
Decline reason:
No grounds for unblock provided; and hooliganism is unwelcome on Wikipedia. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 15:36, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unclebert10 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm not here to vandilize everything and the reason I think the block is unfair is because it was only performed on one article.
Decline reason:
There is no "sports rivalry" exception to our vandalism policies. You also appear to have edited other articles unconstructively. Kuru (talk) 16:41, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
What about the vandalism also done on Taunton School [1] and Rickie Lambert [2]? – MuZemike 16:37, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Unclebert10 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
please remember,another declined appeal is another person off wikipedia.I hope this changes your thoughts.
Decline reason:
Yes, it is, but we won't miss a vandal. Additionally, your unblock reason does not address why you were blocked. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 16:56, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unclebert10 ( talk) 16:52, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Unclebert10 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
will you bloody shut up idiots,anyway it was a right winger who started this crap. Unclebert10 ( talk) 17:04, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
That's as may be, but has nothing to do with your block. And, since your edits and unblock requests here make it clear that you have no intention of editing within our policies - especially the ones that don't permit blanking articles for rival football clubs - I've removed your ability to edit this page. You may appeal your block via e-mail, as per our guide to appealing blocks, if you wish. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 17:20, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.