![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
![]() |
Chill man! Help me out! Lubnarizvi ( talk) 15:28, 4 December 2012 (UTC) |
I see you are invovled with WP:Article Rescue Squadron from your well deserved ARS awards, so I feel like we can have a good discussion about the speedy deletion tag you added to the article I created, Chicken Kiev speech. Please see the talk page rational for why this article should exist, and please consider removing the tag. thank you. Spoildead ( talk) 15:31, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Cheers! Like I said, I do not know much about the wikipedia. I can provide you with the links so that you can edit it. What will happen after 7 days. I am totally dumb you see. Lubnarizvi ( talk) 15:35, 4 December 2012 (UTC) |
Here's a fyi too, you can add a new section without the wikilove by clicking the new section button or the edit button above the section you created to add to an existing section, it will make the record of our discussion easier to follow if another editor sees and wants to help you too. And the AFD (Article for deletion) discussion runs seven days generally before any decision is made so you will have that time to continue working on the article and even then if you still believe it has potential and it was deleted you can as the deleting/closing admin to mover it to your userspaace which will allow you to continue work on it there without loss of the effort you've done so far. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 15:44, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much! You are a really very helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lubnarizvi ( talk • contribs) 15:49, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Lubnarizvi ( talk) 14:02, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Can you help me help you? Right now I'm not sure it meets the criteria.
Hell In A Bucket (
talk) 16:07, 4 December 2012 (UT)
Yes, She has written a book as you can see in the article. It is on amazon as well and on her website. She is a lecturer and many awards has been awarded to her but these are not by UNO? These are mainly from Iran and Iraq since she is a notable figure there. Like I said I have no idea but you can google her and find out more. Now I am relying on you entirely. Help!!!!
Lubnarizvi (
talk)
16:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure why you tagged that one. A7 doesn't apply in userspace, or what your list has to do with it... There's not enough content there for a MfD for FAKEARTICLE. It's a page that bears watching, though, just in case it turns into something that it shouldn't. 8-( Peridon ( talk) 17:25, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Wow, I'm not either. Mistake for sure. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 17:31, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
-- Lubnarizvi ( talk) 17:45, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello Hell in a Bucket. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Benefits of Using Signed Exact English in the Classroom, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not really promotional and I think it can be salvaged. Thank you. SmartSE ( talk) 21:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
I have changed the category so please remove your tag, since it matches up the criteria now. -- Lubnarizvi ( talk) 11:31, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Agreed, they claim notability, but the problem is a couple of things. (1) there is no notable sources (the only links are the books publishers and to an article the person wrote about themselves); (2) the editor is a WP:SPA and violates WP:USERNAME policies; (3) is blanking the AFD on their page.... While they may be well meaning that doesn't preclude them from blatantly disregarding messages and notices, and continuing to editing the page. Your thoughts? Tiggerjay ( talk) 20:38, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Some of those edits could have been legitimate. I think we effectively protected the encyclopedia (which is our foremost responsibility) by deleting the articles created. If they were to keep recreating, I think we'd be justified in blocking.
As for your other question, no, Arabic and Farsi are entirely different languages that use pretty much the same alphabet. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
I know I am irritating you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lubnarizvi ( talk • contribs) 16:28, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
http://www.newshia.net/news.php?id=183 Just a brief autobiography. I don't know if its gonna help. I can't write the time and then signing it, I am at work! Boss is bossy ( I am from London btw)-- Lubnarizvi ( talk) 17:08, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Lubnarizvi
Thanks I have found this link on BBC Radio http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/2005_36_mon_06.shtml, she was interviewed by BBC Radio. -- Lubnarizvi ( talk) 17:41, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
--Lubna Rizvi 17:25, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
I have also tried to play nice but you been biased and racist all the time. There is nothing wrong with the article and it meets all the criteria of the Wikipedia rules. Yes, I edited the comment of the user because you seemed to be promoting your ideas and pushing others to contribute towards your idea of deleting the article.
Your edit summary said delete, but without the usual "• Delete." at the beginning of your !vote, I think there's a risk that a closing admin may treat it as a comment, not a !vote. Msnicki ( talk) 18:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Well, I'd read WP:SPA and decide what you want to do, whether you want to use the {{ spa}} tag or not. If the user is being otherwise respectful and following policy, I'd just let things play out in good faith. Daniel Case ( talk) 17:34, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension.
I was wrong to edit. I'm sorry.-- Dantetheperuvian ( talk) 00:32, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Regarding User talk:Youreallycan#Tom Stienstra, I think YRC is on break for the next week or so. -- Anthonyhcole ( talk) 23:22, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Stienstra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Stienstra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 23:25, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Norman G. Davis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baltimore Colts ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:35, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
I declined the speedy deletion of Tillage Live; since you tagged it the article looks less spammy and more like an actual, notable event. Best, Mackensen (talk) 05:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello Hell in a Bucket! I noticed that you had also reported account User:Fuck you jimbo at WP:AIV 7 minutes after I had reported it to WP:UAA. Just curious to know that did you also randomly come by that offensive username and report it ? or reported it at AIV after seeing it that I had reported it to UAA ? Anyways thanks for your help and good teamwork :) TheGeneralUser (talk) 04:39, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I sent you this notice because I read your speedy deletion notice on User talk:Frenchytv (Nov. 15th) and thought you questioned Tony Vitti's notability. -- Koui² ( talk) 15:20, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
that Carl H. Conrads already exists as Carl Conrads. You might want to consider moving your NOTABILITY tag over there. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 00:45, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
A bit odd since it is the same guy? Oh well. Carptrash ( talk) 01:51, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello Hell in a Bucket. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sacramento Ball Drop, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Does not meet the requirements of A7. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 02:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
From the policy "An article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization or web content that does not indicate why its subject is importance" Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 02:48, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
If a speedy nomination is declined (by someone other than the page author), please do not put it back. At that point, using a different deletion process is the way to go, if you still think deletion was warranted. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:46, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lubnarizvi ( talk • contribs) 10:37, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
...I was replying to her, not you.
[2] No worries, though!
—
Francophonie&Androphilie(
Je vous invite à me parler)
11:11, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Vitti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Vitti until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --
Koui² (
talk)
14:23, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Note
Please
stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have find out that I am not that experienced on Wikipedia so you have started to tag my article. This article already had the tag to make improvements regarding sources. Despite making correction like other editors did, you have launched a campaign to oppose everything I do on the article. You have not given any healthy suggestions but just ugly remarks. --
Lubna Rizvi
16:20, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
KTC ( talk) 16:26, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
If you try to do anything on my user talk page! I will block you! I have warned you several times not to communicate with me! Just F off from my User page! -- Lubna Rizvi 01:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Wow that was fast [4] AIRcorn (talk) 12:03, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
FYI, I bolded your delete !vote so the tool would register it. It only counts bolded !votes. Feel free to revert if you disagree. GregJackP Boomer! 15:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Dear User:Hell in a Bucket, I am new on wikipedia and my first article "Mahipal Singh Deora" is chosen for speedy deletion. I have all information about this article but i lacks the information to create an article. my email is <redacted> . Can you prevent this article from deletion i will provide all information that you needed.
User: ImmortalSpartans — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImmortalSpartans ( talk • contribs) 09:46, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Can you provide me your email so that i can send you all the information related to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImmortalSpartans ( talk • contribs) 09:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Sorry i unable to find that as you have my email. can you mail me — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImmortalSpartans ( talk • contribs) 10:00, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your note on my talk page. I have replied there. JamesBWatson ( talk) 11:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
GregJackP Boomer! 01:35, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you posted that Im engaged in some kind of war, which I havent even thought about. Actually, you started the "war", and now you are accusing the others ? Is this the way to write constructively ? Regards, -- Pesen S Trompet ( talk) 08:39, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
Good work on creating Dax Charles. Your honesty is commendable. Viriditas ( talk) 03:15, 9 January 2013 (UTC) |
ImmortalSpartans ImmortalSpartans ( talk) 09:08, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey, please comment at The Blade's talk page. Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 01:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | |
For a commendable effort on working with a new editor. While it didn't ultimately end well, it was certainly not for lack of effort or any other fault on your part. Please continue to work with new editors and try to gently introduce them to Wikipedia. Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Anti-Flame Barnstar | |
For attempting to put out multiple fires at once while remaining cool, calm and collected. Turns out he was determined to burn the house down anyway, but you certainly did your best. Keep up the good work! Stalwart 111 12:52, 11 January 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For taking a moment to welcome new editors: Thanks! Openverse ( talk) 08:55, 12 January 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks, this has been the week of the barnstar for me... Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 08:58, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Please, in the future, check to make sure they are blocked. That was a suppressable username you reported. Next time be more careful. -- Bsa dow ski1 11:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Can I ask why you added JaxEdit to September 30's log as seen here? JayJay What did I do? 01:57, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
ImmortalSpartans ImmortalSpartans ( talk) 16:35, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ImmortalSpartans/sandbox#Request_review_at_WP:AFC ImmortalSpartans ImmortalSpartans ( talk) 11:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Keen eyes and fingers! This is for helping revert troll vandalism for me... Even before I could. Neat and nice. Cheers and be well. Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 10:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
The Master of Puppets has put an end to the sockpuppets. Lol thanks. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 06:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Let's now let the lynch everyone atmosphere get ahold of us a ? Think you meant to say something slightly different (Let's not?) NE Ent 13:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey, I've opened a merge discussion for the above article. Sceptre ( talk) 15:52, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
It's about the NY SAFE Act, also something should be included in Andrew Cuomo's page about it. IronKnuckle ( talk) 05:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, why are you changing the Bill Browder biography page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katiefisher ( talk • contribs) 11:39, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your response.
I understand the need for neutrality. However, you removed huge chunks of text and changed headings which were in no way one sided. We just updated our page, with each line fully sourced and linked. You have removed those for some reason as well. Furthermore, you have edited text and changed headings which are now specifically defamatory and even libellous.
Are you censoring and deleting text on your own volition? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katiefisher ( talk • contribs) 12:30, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
This is why we insist and strongly discourage paid editing, I have no dog in this argument one way or another, I don't care if he defrauded the Russian people, I don't care that the Russians may have persecuted him through the legal system. The only thing I care about is that the article is neutral, and well sourced period the end, I'm not here to hide information just present it. I'm blunt and apologize if this comes off as rudeness which is not my intention. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 12:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
There is no requirement in closing an WP:RM [9] to put a pretty box around it, but it is necessary to delete the Requested move template, which I have done. Apteva ( talk) 19:22, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
What's behind the request for pp on bill whatshisname? Going full doesn't seem to solve anything, and I'm less wont to work on it if I have to edit through the talk page. Or am I missing something?
little green rosetta
(talk)
central scrutinizer
22:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
This is a good thing! Really that's what was needed, I requested a change to the protection a few hours back no response and opened a SPI as well. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 15:53, 16 February 2013 (UTC) As if to make me a liar they just removed to the correct protection level. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 15:56, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
that's interesting when I google that I didn't see anything you're probably right about it being canvassed so will see what ends up happening Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 16:33, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello Hell in a Bucket. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Vilify (song), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to records. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 16:11, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Yunshui 雲 水 09:56, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jake, I have been trying to get this page up for some time as it is important for people researching the VLE and virtual learning platform market...Frogtrade are one of the World's leading providers of this type of software.
When I look at other much smaller providers (Firefly solutions) who are represented on Wikipedia they have got very similar information on their page.
What do I need to do to get this approved, there is no reason at all for it to not be there from what I have seen and my interpretation, all VERY subjective I feel.
I have advised I now work at Frogtrade but have been a teacher in the very near past who actually used the software daily, so have written this as I started my role here in January from that perspective.
If I am missing a point could you please let me know in very plain English what needs to be done to amend and get approved.
Many thanks for your time.
WikiFrow ( talk) 16:36, 21 February 2013
Thank you for your time Jake, I am back at work now so hopefully we can get this completed asap.
Cheers.
WikiFrow ( talk) 08:19, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kentucky Reptile Zoo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:58, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Please take it easy here. You are correct that someone with a COI was editing the article but it is also true that multiple anonymous ip numbers have repeatedly inserted highly defamatory and contentious material into the article with poor sourcing (at best). BLP subjects should be forgiven clumsy attempts to defend themselves against vicious attacks.
I'd really appreciate your help in trying to dig down to the bottom of this - I'm just now learning about the whole thing myself.-- Jimbo Wales ( talk) 17:02, 23 February 2013
Hi again, hope you had a nice weekend? I seem to be still once again with getting the Frogtrade Wikipedia page sorted and live. I have tweaked this page and would love to know what else there is that needs to be done to get it approved, hopefully its fine now!
Kind regards
WikiFrow ( talk) 15:01, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Helping Hand Barnstar | |
For helping new users like WikiFrow and countless others... at least your enjoyin' the ride. Thank you for all you do here. 7 09:20, 26 February 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks so much I really appreciate it! Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 09:32, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your suggestions. Am adding references, the main source is http://iebc.or.ke/index.php/media-center/press-releases/item/nominated-candidates-for-the-4th-march-2013?category_id=7, but also linking to official webpages. If you have other suggestions or can improve the templates, please feel free to do so. Anon547 ( talk) 08:46, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Can you tell me what we are exactly discussing? If you point me to the article I can help but I'm a little lost. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 02:45, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
There's a bit of a discussion on the talk page for Bend, Not Break. The long and short of it is that User:VanHarrisArt thinks that the book is a redundant fork of the author's page and wants to redirect it, while I think it merits its own article. It's received several reviews for the book and also has received coverage for the controversy. It's also no longer an attack page and in my opinion, reads rather neutrally. I think it merits its own article at this point, as it passes WP:NBOOK based on the amount of reviews alone. I saw that you had previously weighed in elsewhere on the book, so I didn't know if you wanted to take a look at the current version of the article. VanHarrisArt says that it still has neutrality issues, but I think it's fairly neutral in tone. I've taken pains to include both sides of the controversy and used quotes where I thought it'd be a little difficult to adequately summarize. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
The reason why I'm following this issue is not because I believe Ping Fu is telling the truth or lying. I honestly don't know. I'm involved because I hate bullies, and if I can help keep the playing field level, I've done something of value. If you want to understand what is happening here, read this article about Grace Wang.
I have deep background on the genesis of this Human flesh search engine, and have been communicating with and tracking the participants for over a month. They have discussed most everything they've done here, on WP, in advance in the forums at Amazon. They're not shy. (And I still don't know what to call them. Attackers? Critics? a Mob? They like to call themselves "truth seekers.")
While Amazon does not enforce terms of use in their forums (and hence, have allowed the participants to have the run of things), at least here I can make a difference. I don't need to advocate. All I need to do is keep things honest. Because I've done my homework, I can recognize when someone is posting unverifiable information.
In the case of the pages from last night, e.g., 漂流瓶-_A_Memoir_in_Chinese, I had already spoken to a Chinese expert (a person who had been a US reporter in China for many years) and had verified that the book doesn't say what they say it does. The truth seekers had already published these claims elsewhere, so I was familiar with them, and knew that they were unverifiable.
Personally, I don't care whether you call it an attack page or not. The rule is "Contentious material about living persons (or recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." This material was contentious, and was poorly sourced to an out of print Chinese language book with no English translation, If that wasn't enough, WP:NOENG should have sunk the articles.
OK... those are my thoughts. I'm just trying to keep things above-board. VanHarrisArt ( talk) 17:57, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
I didn't know how much you were still following the kerfuffle at the Bend Not Break board, but I've opened up a dispute resolution. I've named you in it since you were one of the earliest responders. ( Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Bend.2C_Not_Break) Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 15:35, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
You have been here long enough to know what to do when your bold edit has been reverted. Also could you pls ask for help in moving the page like this in the future as its not being done correctly - cant just copy and paste we loss the history. Moxy ( talk) 05:58, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Ok works for me, after all we all bend over for consensus whatever that ends up being. I get a little testy sometimes but a RFC seems like the fairest way to go and I agree. Thanks for being polite. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 06:31, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey Hell in a Bucket; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 23:58, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, they vary from the massively notable to the only-appear-in-histories-of-RC-church-in-Singapore kind. I've added book footnotes to 6 or 7 of 8. Came up blank with the biggest new suburban one. In ictu oculi ( talk) 05:30, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you have recently undone my changes on Bill Browder's page. The information was duly sourced and compliant with wiki policies. Next time before making critical updates please make sure to raise a point on the talk page. Thank you.-- Plutonius1965 ( talk) 14:40, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you, Hell in a Bucket. That was really tough, indeed.-- Plutonius1965 ( talk) 21:21, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
hey, im sorry for the types of delicacies page, its for a school project and until ten i need it to be there. i might not be great at making articles but taking the page down is going to minimize the effort and initiative the person takes to make a page. so till the end of this year i request you not to bring it down. Thank you
Sammysanjay (
talk)
09:58, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
why did you revert the page to a status which actually decreases quality? Biker Biker made a mistake and doubted licence for file and did not follow wiki protocol. Now you revert to the status as if the file where still under dispute which is not. Please do such action only after asking questions on the discussion page instead of opening up issues which were actually closed today. Please revert your reversion because you also reversed the citations which were missing Bmwtroll ( talk) 13:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about the delayed response; I've been very busy with an offline crisis the last few days.
I have unblocked. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:02, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
See the John Ritter article's Talk Page for info I added. You have a lot to learn about the proper steps for disputing a contribution and having the proper attitude. You have violated Wikipedia guidelines. I am simply trying to assist in the edit someone else made, not defending it. According to your reasoning, the fact Cash died less than 24 hours doesn't belong there either then. It's an "orphan" statement. Plenty of articles contain a minor "expansion" of related information to a topic. I was simply trying to tie it all together to salvage it. I could care less if it's there or not. They are related since Tex is John's dad. Like Johns' son appeared in the opening of Three's Company, there was some connection shared between John and Johnny at some point I'm sure as a result of Tex being his dad. Nonetheless, like Tex Ritter's article mentions his son and the connection with John and Jason helping with United Cerebral Palsy due to his son Thomas Ritter's condition, I think it's fine being there and isn't "hurting" anyone, but you want to be sure it's not included for some reason. Right, wrong or indifferent, you did not go about it properly and for that should be warned for causing an edit war in my opinion. There is some "truth" to what was there, you just don't seem to want it there. 99.129.112.89 ( talk) 07:59, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
P.S. I did not add Youtube as a source for the record, although many articles include it as a reference at the bottom of the article. However, it's undeniable that the footage is Cash and Tex as can be seen in other reliable news articles. You can be stubborn so you "win" but you are clearly wrong in your actions (reverting without discussing and rejecting legitimate proof). At least I conducted myself properly. 99.129.112.89 ( talk) 08:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you added a POV tag to the Timothy L. Tyler but did not provide any explanation. I am removing as per this guidance. "This label is meant to indicate that a discussion is still going on, and that the article's content is disputed, and volatile. If you add this template to an article in which there is no relevant discussion underway, you need at least to leave a note on the article's talk page describing what you consider unacceptable about the article. The note should address the troubling passages, elements, or phrases specifically enough to encourage constructive discussion that leads to resolution. If you believe that material or a particular viewpoint is missing, then you should try to give examples of published, independent, reliable sources that contain this missing material or point of view. In the absence of an ongoing discussion on the article's talk page, any editor may remove this tag at any time." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohnohedinnit ( talk • contribs) 07:24, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
![]() |
Chill man! Help me out! Lubnarizvi ( talk) 15:28, 4 December 2012 (UTC) |
I see you are invovled with WP:Article Rescue Squadron from your well deserved ARS awards, so I feel like we can have a good discussion about the speedy deletion tag you added to the article I created, Chicken Kiev speech. Please see the talk page rational for why this article should exist, and please consider removing the tag. thank you. Spoildead ( talk) 15:31, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Cheers! Like I said, I do not know much about the wikipedia. I can provide you with the links so that you can edit it. What will happen after 7 days. I am totally dumb you see. Lubnarizvi ( talk) 15:35, 4 December 2012 (UTC) |
Here's a fyi too, you can add a new section without the wikilove by clicking the new section button or the edit button above the section you created to add to an existing section, it will make the record of our discussion easier to follow if another editor sees and wants to help you too. And the AFD (Article for deletion) discussion runs seven days generally before any decision is made so you will have that time to continue working on the article and even then if you still believe it has potential and it was deleted you can as the deleting/closing admin to mover it to your userspaace which will allow you to continue work on it there without loss of the effort you've done so far. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 15:44, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much! You are a really very helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lubnarizvi ( talk • contribs) 15:49, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Lubnarizvi ( talk) 14:02, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Can you help me help you? Right now I'm not sure it meets the criteria.
Hell In A Bucket (
talk) 16:07, 4 December 2012 (UT)
Yes, She has written a book as you can see in the article. It is on amazon as well and on her website. She is a lecturer and many awards has been awarded to her but these are not by UNO? These are mainly from Iran and Iraq since she is a notable figure there. Like I said I have no idea but you can google her and find out more. Now I am relying on you entirely. Help!!!!
Lubnarizvi (
talk)
16:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure why you tagged that one. A7 doesn't apply in userspace, or what your list has to do with it... There's not enough content there for a MfD for FAKEARTICLE. It's a page that bears watching, though, just in case it turns into something that it shouldn't. 8-( Peridon ( talk) 17:25, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Wow, I'm not either. Mistake for sure. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 17:31, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
-- Lubnarizvi ( talk) 17:45, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello Hell in a Bucket. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Benefits of Using Signed Exact English in the Classroom, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not really promotional and I think it can be salvaged. Thank you. SmartSE ( talk) 21:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
I have changed the category so please remove your tag, since it matches up the criteria now. -- Lubnarizvi ( talk) 11:31, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Agreed, they claim notability, but the problem is a couple of things. (1) there is no notable sources (the only links are the books publishers and to an article the person wrote about themselves); (2) the editor is a WP:SPA and violates WP:USERNAME policies; (3) is blanking the AFD on their page.... While they may be well meaning that doesn't preclude them from blatantly disregarding messages and notices, and continuing to editing the page. Your thoughts? Tiggerjay ( talk) 20:38, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Some of those edits could have been legitimate. I think we effectively protected the encyclopedia (which is our foremost responsibility) by deleting the articles created. If they were to keep recreating, I think we'd be justified in blocking.
As for your other question, no, Arabic and Farsi are entirely different languages that use pretty much the same alphabet. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
I know I am irritating you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lubnarizvi ( talk • contribs) 16:28, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
http://www.newshia.net/news.php?id=183 Just a brief autobiography. I don't know if its gonna help. I can't write the time and then signing it, I am at work! Boss is bossy ( I am from London btw)-- Lubnarizvi ( talk) 17:08, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Lubnarizvi
Thanks I have found this link on BBC Radio http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/2005_36_mon_06.shtml, she was interviewed by BBC Radio. -- Lubnarizvi ( talk) 17:41, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
--Lubna Rizvi 17:25, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
I have also tried to play nice but you been biased and racist all the time. There is nothing wrong with the article and it meets all the criteria of the Wikipedia rules. Yes, I edited the comment of the user because you seemed to be promoting your ideas and pushing others to contribute towards your idea of deleting the article.
Your edit summary said delete, but without the usual "• Delete." at the beginning of your !vote, I think there's a risk that a closing admin may treat it as a comment, not a !vote. Msnicki ( talk) 18:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Well, I'd read WP:SPA and decide what you want to do, whether you want to use the {{ spa}} tag or not. If the user is being otherwise respectful and following policy, I'd just let things play out in good faith. Daniel Case ( talk) 17:34, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension.
I was wrong to edit. I'm sorry.-- Dantetheperuvian ( talk) 00:32, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Regarding User talk:Youreallycan#Tom Stienstra, I think YRC is on break for the next week or so. -- Anthonyhcole ( talk) 23:22, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Stienstra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Stienstra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 23:25, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Norman G. Davis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baltimore Colts ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:35, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
I declined the speedy deletion of Tillage Live; since you tagged it the article looks less spammy and more like an actual, notable event. Best, Mackensen (talk) 05:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello Hell in a Bucket! I noticed that you had also reported account User:Fuck you jimbo at WP:AIV 7 minutes after I had reported it to WP:UAA. Just curious to know that did you also randomly come by that offensive username and report it ? or reported it at AIV after seeing it that I had reported it to UAA ? Anyways thanks for your help and good teamwork :) TheGeneralUser (talk) 04:39, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I sent you this notice because I read your speedy deletion notice on User talk:Frenchytv (Nov. 15th) and thought you questioned Tony Vitti's notability. -- Koui² ( talk) 15:20, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
that Carl H. Conrads already exists as Carl Conrads. You might want to consider moving your NOTABILITY tag over there. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 00:45, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
A bit odd since it is the same guy? Oh well. Carptrash ( talk) 01:51, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello Hell in a Bucket. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sacramento Ball Drop, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Does not meet the requirements of A7. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 02:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
From the policy "An article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization or web content that does not indicate why its subject is importance" Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 02:48, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
If a speedy nomination is declined (by someone other than the page author), please do not put it back. At that point, using a different deletion process is the way to go, if you still think deletion was warranted. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:46, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lubnarizvi ( talk • contribs) 10:37, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
...I was replying to her, not you.
[2] No worries, though!
—
Francophonie&Androphilie(
Je vous invite à me parler)
11:11, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Vitti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Vitti until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --
Koui² (
talk)
14:23, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Note
Please
stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have find out that I am not that experienced on Wikipedia so you have started to tag my article. This article already had the tag to make improvements regarding sources. Despite making correction like other editors did, you have launched a campaign to oppose everything I do on the article. You have not given any healthy suggestions but just ugly remarks. --
Lubna Rizvi
16:20, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
KTC ( talk) 16:26, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
If you try to do anything on my user talk page! I will block you! I have warned you several times not to communicate with me! Just F off from my User page! -- Lubna Rizvi 01:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Wow that was fast [4] AIRcorn (talk) 12:03, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
FYI, I bolded your delete !vote so the tool would register it. It only counts bolded !votes. Feel free to revert if you disagree. GregJackP Boomer! 15:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Dear User:Hell in a Bucket, I am new on wikipedia and my first article "Mahipal Singh Deora" is chosen for speedy deletion. I have all information about this article but i lacks the information to create an article. my email is <redacted> . Can you prevent this article from deletion i will provide all information that you needed.
User: ImmortalSpartans — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImmortalSpartans ( talk • contribs) 09:46, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Can you provide me your email so that i can send you all the information related to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImmortalSpartans ( talk • contribs) 09:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Sorry i unable to find that as you have my email. can you mail me — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImmortalSpartans ( talk • contribs) 10:00, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your note on my talk page. I have replied there. JamesBWatson ( talk) 11:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
GregJackP Boomer! 01:35, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you posted that Im engaged in some kind of war, which I havent even thought about. Actually, you started the "war", and now you are accusing the others ? Is this the way to write constructively ? Regards, -- Pesen S Trompet ( talk) 08:39, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
Good work on creating Dax Charles. Your honesty is commendable. Viriditas ( talk) 03:15, 9 January 2013 (UTC) |
ImmortalSpartans ImmortalSpartans ( talk) 09:08, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey, please comment at The Blade's talk page. Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 01:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | |
For a commendable effort on working with a new editor. While it didn't ultimately end well, it was certainly not for lack of effort or any other fault on your part. Please continue to work with new editors and try to gently introduce them to Wikipedia. Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Anti-Flame Barnstar | |
For attempting to put out multiple fires at once while remaining cool, calm and collected. Turns out he was determined to burn the house down anyway, but you certainly did your best. Keep up the good work! Stalwart 111 12:52, 11 January 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For taking a moment to welcome new editors: Thanks! Openverse ( talk) 08:55, 12 January 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks, this has been the week of the barnstar for me... Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 08:58, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Please, in the future, check to make sure they are blocked. That was a suppressable username you reported. Next time be more careful. -- Bsa dow ski1 11:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Can I ask why you added JaxEdit to September 30's log as seen here? JayJay What did I do? 01:57, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
ImmortalSpartans ImmortalSpartans ( talk) 16:35, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ImmortalSpartans/sandbox#Request_review_at_WP:AFC ImmortalSpartans ImmortalSpartans ( talk) 11:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Keen eyes and fingers! This is for helping revert troll vandalism for me... Even before I could. Neat and nice. Cheers and be well. Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 10:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
The Master of Puppets has put an end to the sockpuppets. Lol thanks. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 06:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Let's now let the lynch everyone atmosphere get ahold of us a ? Think you meant to say something slightly different (Let's not?) NE Ent 13:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey, I've opened a merge discussion for the above article. Sceptre ( talk) 15:52, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
It's about the NY SAFE Act, also something should be included in Andrew Cuomo's page about it. IronKnuckle ( talk) 05:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, why are you changing the Bill Browder biography page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katiefisher ( talk • contribs) 11:39, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your response.
I understand the need for neutrality. However, you removed huge chunks of text and changed headings which were in no way one sided. We just updated our page, with each line fully sourced and linked. You have removed those for some reason as well. Furthermore, you have edited text and changed headings which are now specifically defamatory and even libellous.
Are you censoring and deleting text on your own volition? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katiefisher ( talk • contribs) 12:30, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
This is why we insist and strongly discourage paid editing, I have no dog in this argument one way or another, I don't care if he defrauded the Russian people, I don't care that the Russians may have persecuted him through the legal system. The only thing I care about is that the article is neutral, and well sourced period the end, I'm not here to hide information just present it. I'm blunt and apologize if this comes off as rudeness which is not my intention. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 12:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
There is no requirement in closing an WP:RM [9] to put a pretty box around it, but it is necessary to delete the Requested move template, which I have done. Apteva ( talk) 19:22, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
What's behind the request for pp on bill whatshisname? Going full doesn't seem to solve anything, and I'm less wont to work on it if I have to edit through the talk page. Or am I missing something?
little green rosetta
(talk)
central scrutinizer
22:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
This is a good thing! Really that's what was needed, I requested a change to the protection a few hours back no response and opened a SPI as well. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 15:53, 16 February 2013 (UTC) As if to make me a liar they just removed to the correct protection level. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 15:56, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
that's interesting when I google that I didn't see anything you're probably right about it being canvassed so will see what ends up happening Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 16:33, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello Hell in a Bucket. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Vilify (song), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to records. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 16:11, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Yunshui 雲 水 09:56, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jake, I have been trying to get this page up for some time as it is important for people researching the VLE and virtual learning platform market...Frogtrade are one of the World's leading providers of this type of software.
When I look at other much smaller providers (Firefly solutions) who are represented on Wikipedia they have got very similar information on their page.
What do I need to do to get this approved, there is no reason at all for it to not be there from what I have seen and my interpretation, all VERY subjective I feel.
I have advised I now work at Frogtrade but have been a teacher in the very near past who actually used the software daily, so have written this as I started my role here in January from that perspective.
If I am missing a point could you please let me know in very plain English what needs to be done to amend and get approved.
Many thanks for your time.
WikiFrow ( talk) 16:36, 21 February 2013
Thank you for your time Jake, I am back at work now so hopefully we can get this completed asap.
Cheers.
WikiFrow ( talk) 08:19, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kentucky Reptile Zoo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:58, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Please take it easy here. You are correct that someone with a COI was editing the article but it is also true that multiple anonymous ip numbers have repeatedly inserted highly defamatory and contentious material into the article with poor sourcing (at best). BLP subjects should be forgiven clumsy attempts to defend themselves against vicious attacks.
I'd really appreciate your help in trying to dig down to the bottom of this - I'm just now learning about the whole thing myself.-- Jimbo Wales ( talk) 17:02, 23 February 2013
Hi again, hope you had a nice weekend? I seem to be still once again with getting the Frogtrade Wikipedia page sorted and live. I have tweaked this page and would love to know what else there is that needs to be done to get it approved, hopefully its fine now!
Kind regards
WikiFrow ( talk) 15:01, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Helping Hand Barnstar | |
For helping new users like WikiFrow and countless others... at least your enjoyin' the ride. Thank you for all you do here. 7 09:20, 26 February 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks so much I really appreciate it! Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 09:32, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your suggestions. Am adding references, the main source is http://iebc.or.ke/index.php/media-center/press-releases/item/nominated-candidates-for-the-4th-march-2013?category_id=7, but also linking to official webpages. If you have other suggestions or can improve the templates, please feel free to do so. Anon547 ( talk) 08:46, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Can you tell me what we are exactly discussing? If you point me to the article I can help but I'm a little lost. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 02:45, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
There's a bit of a discussion on the talk page for Bend, Not Break. The long and short of it is that User:VanHarrisArt thinks that the book is a redundant fork of the author's page and wants to redirect it, while I think it merits its own article. It's received several reviews for the book and also has received coverage for the controversy. It's also no longer an attack page and in my opinion, reads rather neutrally. I think it merits its own article at this point, as it passes WP:NBOOK based on the amount of reviews alone. I saw that you had previously weighed in elsewhere on the book, so I didn't know if you wanted to take a look at the current version of the article. VanHarrisArt says that it still has neutrality issues, but I think it's fairly neutral in tone. I've taken pains to include both sides of the controversy and used quotes where I thought it'd be a little difficult to adequately summarize. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
The reason why I'm following this issue is not because I believe Ping Fu is telling the truth or lying. I honestly don't know. I'm involved because I hate bullies, and if I can help keep the playing field level, I've done something of value. If you want to understand what is happening here, read this article about Grace Wang.
I have deep background on the genesis of this Human flesh search engine, and have been communicating with and tracking the participants for over a month. They have discussed most everything they've done here, on WP, in advance in the forums at Amazon. They're not shy. (And I still don't know what to call them. Attackers? Critics? a Mob? They like to call themselves "truth seekers.")
While Amazon does not enforce terms of use in their forums (and hence, have allowed the participants to have the run of things), at least here I can make a difference. I don't need to advocate. All I need to do is keep things honest. Because I've done my homework, I can recognize when someone is posting unverifiable information.
In the case of the pages from last night, e.g., 漂流瓶-_A_Memoir_in_Chinese, I had already spoken to a Chinese expert (a person who had been a US reporter in China for many years) and had verified that the book doesn't say what they say it does. The truth seekers had already published these claims elsewhere, so I was familiar with them, and knew that they were unverifiable.
Personally, I don't care whether you call it an attack page or not. The rule is "Contentious material about living persons (or recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." This material was contentious, and was poorly sourced to an out of print Chinese language book with no English translation, If that wasn't enough, WP:NOENG should have sunk the articles.
OK... those are my thoughts. I'm just trying to keep things above-board. VanHarrisArt ( talk) 17:57, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
I didn't know how much you were still following the kerfuffle at the Bend Not Break board, but I've opened up a dispute resolution. I've named you in it since you were one of the earliest responders. ( Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Bend.2C_Not_Break) Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 15:35, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
You have been here long enough to know what to do when your bold edit has been reverted. Also could you pls ask for help in moving the page like this in the future as its not being done correctly - cant just copy and paste we loss the history. Moxy ( talk) 05:58, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Ok works for me, after all we all bend over for consensus whatever that ends up being. I get a little testy sometimes but a RFC seems like the fairest way to go and I agree. Thanks for being polite. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 06:31, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey Hell in a Bucket; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 23:58, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, they vary from the massively notable to the only-appear-in-histories-of-RC-church-in-Singapore kind. I've added book footnotes to 6 or 7 of 8. Came up blank with the biggest new suburban one. In ictu oculi ( talk) 05:30, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you have recently undone my changes on Bill Browder's page. The information was duly sourced and compliant with wiki policies. Next time before making critical updates please make sure to raise a point on the talk page. Thank you.-- Plutonius1965 ( talk) 14:40, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you, Hell in a Bucket. That was really tough, indeed.-- Plutonius1965 ( talk) 21:21, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
hey, im sorry for the types of delicacies page, its for a school project and until ten i need it to be there. i might not be great at making articles but taking the page down is going to minimize the effort and initiative the person takes to make a page. so till the end of this year i request you not to bring it down. Thank you
Sammysanjay (
talk)
09:58, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
why did you revert the page to a status which actually decreases quality? Biker Biker made a mistake and doubted licence for file and did not follow wiki protocol. Now you revert to the status as if the file where still under dispute which is not. Please do such action only after asking questions on the discussion page instead of opening up issues which were actually closed today. Please revert your reversion because you also reversed the citations which were missing Bmwtroll ( talk) 13:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about the delayed response; I've been very busy with an offline crisis the last few days.
I have unblocked. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:02, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
See the John Ritter article's Talk Page for info I added. You have a lot to learn about the proper steps for disputing a contribution and having the proper attitude. You have violated Wikipedia guidelines. I am simply trying to assist in the edit someone else made, not defending it. According to your reasoning, the fact Cash died less than 24 hours doesn't belong there either then. It's an "orphan" statement. Plenty of articles contain a minor "expansion" of related information to a topic. I was simply trying to tie it all together to salvage it. I could care less if it's there or not. They are related since Tex is John's dad. Like Johns' son appeared in the opening of Three's Company, there was some connection shared between John and Johnny at some point I'm sure as a result of Tex being his dad. Nonetheless, like Tex Ritter's article mentions his son and the connection with John and Jason helping with United Cerebral Palsy due to his son Thomas Ritter's condition, I think it's fine being there and isn't "hurting" anyone, but you want to be sure it's not included for some reason. Right, wrong or indifferent, you did not go about it properly and for that should be warned for causing an edit war in my opinion. There is some "truth" to what was there, you just don't seem to want it there. 99.129.112.89 ( talk) 07:59, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
P.S. I did not add Youtube as a source for the record, although many articles include it as a reference at the bottom of the article. However, it's undeniable that the footage is Cash and Tex as can be seen in other reliable news articles. You can be stubborn so you "win" but you are clearly wrong in your actions (reverting without discussing and rejecting legitimate proof). At least I conducted myself properly. 99.129.112.89 ( talk) 08:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you added a POV tag to the Timothy L. Tyler but did not provide any explanation. I am removing as per this guidance. "This label is meant to indicate that a discussion is still going on, and that the article's content is disputed, and volatile. If you add this template to an article in which there is no relevant discussion underway, you need at least to leave a note on the article's talk page describing what you consider unacceptable about the article. The note should address the troubling passages, elements, or phrases specifically enough to encourage constructive discussion that leads to resolution. If you believe that material or a particular viewpoint is missing, then you should try to give examples of published, independent, reliable sources that contain this missing material or point of view. In the absence of an ongoing discussion on the article's talk page, any editor may remove this tag at any time." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohnohedinnit ( talk • contribs) 07:24, 7 November 2013 (UTC)