This is Ulmke's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Welcome!
Hello, Ulmke, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --
AF
US
CO
01:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
I think you might need to find and add a reliable source regarding Gustav wrede, the Kaiser's Grand Vizier, a man and title that seem to have slipped through history undocumented. FlowerpotmaN·( t) 01:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
A {{
prod}} template has been added to the article
Gustav wrede, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{
db-author}}.
FlowerpotmaN·(
t)
01:12, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view{{{
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to
substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. --> --> -->}#if:|. A contribution you made to [[:{{{1}}}]] appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem}}. Please remember to observe our
core policies. {{{
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to
substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. --> --> -->}#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}
OhNoitsJamie
Talk
04:49, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia{{{
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to
substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. --> --> -->}#if:G-Unit|, as you did to
G-Unit}}. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. {{{
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to
substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. --> --> -->}#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} --
¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤
22:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Please don't vandalise articles and when you add new information, read WP:NPOV and WP:V. Continuing to add rants such this and this will get you blocked. Thanks. Spellcast ( talk) 23:30, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an
edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to
England. Thank you. --
Jza84 · (
talk)
00:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
England. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Gwernol
02:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to
Switzerland, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Gwernol
02:26, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to
Switzerland, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Gwernol
02:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to insert that material, you need to provide a source. Your personal opinons and commentary are not suitable material for articles.
Kww (
talk)
02:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
This is Ulmke's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Welcome!
Hello, Ulmke, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --
AF
US
CO
01:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
I think you might need to find and add a reliable source regarding Gustav wrede, the Kaiser's Grand Vizier, a man and title that seem to have slipped through history undocumented. FlowerpotmaN·( t) 01:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
A {{
prod}} template has been added to the article
Gustav wrede, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{
db-author}}.
FlowerpotmaN·(
t)
01:12, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view{{{
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to
substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. --> --> -->}#if:|. A contribution you made to [[:{{{1}}}]] appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem}}. Please remember to observe our
core policies. {{{
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to
substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. --> --> -->}#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}
OhNoitsJamie
Talk
04:49, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia{{{
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to
substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. --> --> -->}#if:G-Unit|, as you did to
G-Unit}}. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. {{{
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to
substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. --> --> -->}#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} --
¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤
22:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Please don't vandalise articles and when you add new information, read WP:NPOV and WP:V. Continuing to add rants such this and this will get you blocked. Thanks. Spellcast ( talk) 23:30, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an
edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to
England. Thank you. --
Jza84 · (
talk)
00:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
England. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Gwernol
02:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to
Switzerland, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Gwernol
02:26, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to
Switzerland, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Gwernol
02:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to insert that material, you need to provide a source. Your personal opinons and commentary are not suitable material for articles.
Kww (
talk)
02:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC)