Thanks you :) upstate NYer 19:59, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Pls see my numbered responses on my talk page. Thank you so much for helping. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:07, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
See User_talk:Rlevse#Grace_Sherwood_AKA_Witch_of_Pungo_Pre-FAC — Rlevse • Talk • 00:08, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Grace Sherwood/archive1 and we're off. Thanks for your help and encouragement, it's been great. FAC constructive comments, help, review, etc would be greatly appreciated. Last night and this I add a lot, especially the "personal life" section, so review and copyedit of those edits would be greatly appreciated. — Rlevse • Talk • 15:38, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I've seen you are a regular contributor to FAC, and I wanted to ask you:
Any other suggestions are really, really welcome. Thank you in advance, Ucucha. -- Diego Grez ( talk) 02:49, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
I've nominated an image you uploaded for featured picture status. Just thought you'd want to know. J Milburn ( talk) 16:39, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ucucha, I really appreciate your efforts to maintain Wikipedia a perfect encyclopaedia. I'm quite new here and I've lot to learn from your literated gurus. About a word, Probortunity, I really believe it's extremely useful in common language and specially in marketing language. At the moment is already present in 679 web pages indexed by Google. I was wandering what happen with new words. To get an inclusion must every new word come from a book? Is not the web, the fastest book library in continuous evolution ever built? The page is already deleted, so cannot write in the talk page there. I really appreciate your opinion and let me know what I should do for you to re-evaluate "probortunity".
00:03, 11 September 2010 Courcelles (talk | contribs) deleted "Probortunity" (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Probortunity) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Christian Farioli ( talk • contribs)
Re: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Huia/archive1, would you mind having another look to see if the points you raised have been covered by the changes made to date? The review is going pretty well, we're basically just waiting for Kotare to clear up a couple of points. Kahuroa ( talk) 09:03, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
For fantastic work at Talk:List of mammals of Serbia! You are great! WhiteWriter speaks 08:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC) |
With this, i can slowly work on it! Thanks! -- WhiteWriter speaks 09:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I fixed the issues you mentioned, and looked through the article for other related problems. I believe they are fixed, please check back. Thanks-- PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 22:51, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
I do not totally agree with you revert here. I think the word "decent" is vague, and unclear. I think "our" should be replaced with "Wikipedia's" , because who are the people behind the word "our" ? That word (to me) implies an informal organization, or group of associates of some sort. In other words a club.
By the way, I saw you User page. Congratulations on the tremendous amount of work you have accomplished here at Wikipedia. I mean all the FA articles. I am very impressed. ---- Steve Quinn ( talk) 01:00, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you recently commented on the FA nomination for Slipknot (band) and I have responded to your comments and made edits accordingly. I would appreciate your opinion once again and any further comments you may have, thank you. -- REZTER TALK ø 19:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Please review Wikipedia:REDIRECT#Do_not_.22fix.22_links_to_redirects_that_are_not_broken; your recent edit to {{ David Byrne}} fixed some redirects that weren't broken. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 22:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
I just read that editor's talk page: what's up with that? SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 01:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
I just saw the hook for the Tachyoryctes rex DYK--that was masterful! Congrats. Drmies ( talk) 23:48, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Pls see and advise at: Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#New_Queue_and_Prep_building_tip. Tks. — Rlevse • Talk • 20:50, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
For being one of my favourite Wikipedians at the moment- rational, reasonable, a capable writer and willing reviewer. I wish there were more like you... J Milburn ( talk) 21:37, 16 September 2010 (UTC) |
At least a couple of editors have expressed interest in taking Larkin 25 to GA status. The three editors discussing this matter (including me) are kind of in the dark as to how this goes. My simple request, which is also on their behalf, is would you be willing to take a look at this article and give us some pointers about what you think needs to be improved. This does not have to be like a formal review. This is more or less to grease the wheel (so to speak) to get things rolling. We can submit to the formal process when we have an idea about what general improvements need to be made on this article. Our discussion is taking place here at Larkin 25 talk - Good editing. You are probably busy, so whatever time you can spare would be appreciated. ---- Steve Quinn ( talk) 01:28, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello Ucucha, I was wondering if you could figure out a way to gain access to the painted turtle related content from this source? It would be MUCH appreciated.-- NYMFan69-86 ( talk) 00:44, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
I've added a reply. Nergaal ( talk) 13:07, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Why did you undo my edit, here? Proxima Centauri ( talk) 11:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
nudge :) Casliber ( talk · contribs) 12:38, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ucucha, I'm working on bringing a number of smaller fungus species articles up to GA level, including Clavaria zollingeri. I have found a good-looking source I haven't used yet, but unfortunately for me, it's in Dutch. I would be ever so grateful if you could have a look at the PDF here (volume 49(4)) and let me know what info it has that's not in the article. There's no rush (plenty of other stuff to work on). Sasata ( talk) 17:04, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at an ANI thread, regarding an issue with which you may have been involved, here. Thank you ---- Steve Quinn ( talk) 18:28, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
.. I did hope one of them would do it for me. Thanks a bunch! Sandman888 ( talk) 20:17, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ucucha. So you commented on the article's FLC page a while back, and said you weren't ready to fully express your views on the article. However, I fear the article is reaching the end of its nomination, so I was hoping you can specify how you feel in terms of "Support", "Neutral" or "Oppose", or if you have a comment in which I need to fix something first. Thank you Ucucha!:)-- PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 22:03, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi there Ucucha! Thank you for your participation in the Eustrombus gigas peer review. You helped us immensely. Your comments were constructive and pertinent, and I would expect nothing less from you. Best wishes, Daniel Cavallari ( talk) 01:54, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure as to what degree your dash-fixing script is automated but during this edit a space was introduced in a <ref name="name" /> to make it <ref name="name" / > This occured in a reference contained in a table cell and really messed up the page. Just bringing this to your attention incase it was caused by your script, if it was just a user error then no worries Jebus989 ✰ 09:56, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
<font=3> Thanks again for your helpful advice.
List of longest streams of Oregon made
featured list today. Finetooth ( talk) 02:57, 24 September 2010 (UTC) |
---|
Hoi Ucucha, hope this finds you well. Listen, I just made a little sub-page for myself, User:Drmies/Roman Catholic?, where I list editors who have been making wholesale changes ("Roman Catholic" to "Catholic")--it's a regularly occurring phenomenon. I am not breaking any rules by having such a subpage, right? If I am, please delete it, but I think it's useful information and I don't know where else to put it. Thanks! Drmies ( talk) 19:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Been reading that Code for 15 years, and had never noticed that one little clause there in 35.1 - which really does seem to be the only place that specifically mentions the Code applying to superfamilies (other than the clause in 1.2.2 which does not include the principle of priority, and the clause in the princple of coordination in which a superfamily name automatically becomes available whenever anyone publishes a new family name). Embarrassing to have that pointed out, and it's also embarrassing that my failure to notice it is not unique; I know I've had conversations with other code-conversant folks who have believed (as I did up until about 10 minutes ago) that superfamilies were not subject to all of the standard Code provisions. When I have a chance here, I'll have to go in and edit my comments accordingly, although it does not lead to a different outcome regarding Dr. Lehrer's claims that Rohdendorf is the author of either Oestroidea or Sarcophagoidea; Rohdendorf is not the author of either, and is only notable for his idiosyncratic misspellings. Thanks for correcting my error, and I won't make that mistake again. Peace, Dyanega ( talk) 18:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
<font=3> Thanks for your review of the links in
Exelon Pavilions, which is now a
Featured article, and for all you do on Wikipedia! .-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) and Ruhrfisch ><>°° 20:20, 26 September 2010 (UTC) |
---|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | ||
Grace Sherwood, the Witch of Pungo, is now a FA. I couldn't have done it without you. Thanks for this and all the other articles you've provided superb copyediting on. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:11, 28 September 2010 (UTC) |
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Stevertigo 2/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Stevertigo 2/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, NW ( Talk) 17:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
I see that my first ever contribution has been censored on the grounds that it was copied from another website; not so, it was laboriously typed out from a photo of a publicly displayed notice. I do not think that this is stealing anybody's copyright. John F A Rankin ( talk) 11:22, 30 September 2010 (UTC) John Rankin
Thank you for reviewing the list at FLC. The dead link has been update with a working one, and please let me know if there are any additional concerns that need to be addressed. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 18:44, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for trying to find a solution to the sorting that works on Safari 4 [1]. I guess it didn't work out after all? I would be good to find a solution for everybody, and to be honest, I'd much rather spend my time working on fixing problems than having to argue about them. The more I look at it, the more I suspect we may need a patch to wikibits.js using appendChild to circumvent the innerHTML failure. Do you think WP:VPT be the best place to take this? -- RexxS ( talk) 18:39, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey Ucucha, regarding this comment, do you feel that my failing Bill Dane for GA was inappropriate? Grsz 11 14:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
This user unfortunately speaks en-Bureaucratese at level 4. Fifelfoo ( talk) 04:14, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't see where there is a copyright violation in your recent edit of the Battle of the Atlantic (1939–1945)-- TedColes ( talk) 08:01, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Why did you make it so that only pages were the article name is the same as the book name be italic? This excludes all pages that don't use the subtitle, like The Hobbit and all disambiguated articles. The template {{ Italic title}} is made to exclude the disambiguated part from being italic. Also would you mind doing the same for movies and television: {{ Infobox film}}, {{ Infobox television}} and {{ Infobox television film}}, Thanks. Xeworlebi ( talk) 18:58, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
At T:TDYK, can you search for "The Heidenmauer" and review the nomination? Thanks. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:43, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
there have been some additional comments. Nergaal ( talk) 19:57, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't think I've posted to an "illustrated talk page" before; there was no really suitable rodent but I think I found something suitable. Thanks for the dabcheck and running the dashes script. I have a question about the dashes I hope you can help me with; there was a time when I would change en dashes to the entity reference "–" in order to make it easier to see whether the dash was the right kind in the edit window. I don't do that any more, largely because there seems to be a preference against it; and it's fine with me either way. However, it would be handy to be able to see what kind of dash something is. Do you use, or know of, an editing tool or preference that helps with this? Thanks. Mike Christie (talk) 01:40, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ucucha. So I remember from the FA nomination page that you were thinking of maybe copy-editing the article. You see, the only real problem would be that, so I am looking for an independent editor to help out. Do you think you can? :). Thanks anyway!-- PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 00:00, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ucucha, since you participated in the failed "Butterfly" nomination, I would like your opinion. Do you think this article is better and written better? Thanks-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 17:46, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Undo your "fix" to Feature article tools, it breaks on titles using '&'. NoScript should fix their XSS protection filter and not just white-list Wikipedia URLs! — Dispenser 00:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ucucha, was wondering if you'd be able to check my latest request ... it'll be the last one I promise (for this hook) :) Sasata ( talk) 01:28, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Check Good articles/recent... looks like some of your fungi ga passes were never added. I manually put your Mycena nidificata when I added Mycena multiplicata; but a couple of your others weren't listed. Rcej (Robert) - talk 01:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Yep, Elizabeth Hurley was a fembot: Vanessa_Kensington#Austin_Powers:_The_Spy_Who_Shagged_Me — Rlevse • Talk • 02:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia doesn't know anything but names for most extinct pigs. Is hesitation in order for any suggestion that a biological family named for a central referent well represented by an English word like "pig" might contain, even if no such creature is known to science, might be assumed to contain creatures which likely would represent an intermediate form that would cause reasonable, informed people to disagree as to whether they were really (in this case "pigs") or not? In that case, there must have been "hippopigs" at some point, some of which would be in the pig-dae and others would be in the hippo-dae, and then some that would be in the gray area, even right on the line. Could this line of argument be used to caution against the idea of moving pig to Suidae, because a Suid that isn't a pig is not only possible, but probable? Chrisrus ( talk) 05:03, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks you :) upstate NYer 19:59, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Pls see my numbered responses on my talk page. Thank you so much for helping. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:07, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
See User_talk:Rlevse#Grace_Sherwood_AKA_Witch_of_Pungo_Pre-FAC — Rlevse • Talk • 00:08, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Grace Sherwood/archive1 and we're off. Thanks for your help and encouragement, it's been great. FAC constructive comments, help, review, etc would be greatly appreciated. Last night and this I add a lot, especially the "personal life" section, so review and copyedit of those edits would be greatly appreciated. — Rlevse • Talk • 15:38, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I've seen you are a regular contributor to FAC, and I wanted to ask you:
Any other suggestions are really, really welcome. Thank you in advance, Ucucha. -- Diego Grez ( talk) 02:49, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
I've nominated an image you uploaded for featured picture status. Just thought you'd want to know. J Milburn ( talk) 16:39, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ucucha, I really appreciate your efforts to maintain Wikipedia a perfect encyclopaedia. I'm quite new here and I've lot to learn from your literated gurus. About a word, Probortunity, I really believe it's extremely useful in common language and specially in marketing language. At the moment is already present in 679 web pages indexed by Google. I was wandering what happen with new words. To get an inclusion must every new word come from a book? Is not the web, the fastest book library in continuous evolution ever built? The page is already deleted, so cannot write in the talk page there. I really appreciate your opinion and let me know what I should do for you to re-evaluate "probortunity".
00:03, 11 September 2010 Courcelles (talk | contribs) deleted "Probortunity" (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Probortunity) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Christian Farioli ( talk • contribs)
Re: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Huia/archive1, would you mind having another look to see if the points you raised have been covered by the changes made to date? The review is going pretty well, we're basically just waiting for Kotare to clear up a couple of points. Kahuroa ( talk) 09:03, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
For fantastic work at Talk:List of mammals of Serbia! You are great! WhiteWriter speaks 08:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC) |
With this, i can slowly work on it! Thanks! -- WhiteWriter speaks 09:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I fixed the issues you mentioned, and looked through the article for other related problems. I believe they are fixed, please check back. Thanks-- PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 22:51, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
I do not totally agree with you revert here. I think the word "decent" is vague, and unclear. I think "our" should be replaced with "Wikipedia's" , because who are the people behind the word "our" ? That word (to me) implies an informal organization, or group of associates of some sort. In other words a club.
By the way, I saw you User page. Congratulations on the tremendous amount of work you have accomplished here at Wikipedia. I mean all the FA articles. I am very impressed. ---- Steve Quinn ( talk) 01:00, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you recently commented on the FA nomination for Slipknot (band) and I have responded to your comments and made edits accordingly. I would appreciate your opinion once again and any further comments you may have, thank you. -- REZTER TALK ø 19:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Please review Wikipedia:REDIRECT#Do_not_.22fix.22_links_to_redirects_that_are_not_broken; your recent edit to {{ David Byrne}} fixed some redirects that weren't broken. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 22:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
I just read that editor's talk page: what's up with that? SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 01:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
I just saw the hook for the Tachyoryctes rex DYK--that was masterful! Congrats. Drmies ( talk) 23:48, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Pls see and advise at: Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#New_Queue_and_Prep_building_tip. Tks. — Rlevse • Talk • 20:50, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
For being one of my favourite Wikipedians at the moment- rational, reasonable, a capable writer and willing reviewer. I wish there were more like you... J Milburn ( talk) 21:37, 16 September 2010 (UTC) |
At least a couple of editors have expressed interest in taking Larkin 25 to GA status. The three editors discussing this matter (including me) are kind of in the dark as to how this goes. My simple request, which is also on their behalf, is would you be willing to take a look at this article and give us some pointers about what you think needs to be improved. This does not have to be like a formal review. This is more or less to grease the wheel (so to speak) to get things rolling. We can submit to the formal process when we have an idea about what general improvements need to be made on this article. Our discussion is taking place here at Larkin 25 talk - Good editing. You are probably busy, so whatever time you can spare would be appreciated. ---- Steve Quinn ( talk) 01:28, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello Ucucha, I was wondering if you could figure out a way to gain access to the painted turtle related content from this source? It would be MUCH appreciated.-- NYMFan69-86 ( talk) 00:44, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
I've added a reply. Nergaal ( talk) 13:07, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Why did you undo my edit, here? Proxima Centauri ( talk) 11:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
nudge :) Casliber ( talk · contribs) 12:38, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ucucha, I'm working on bringing a number of smaller fungus species articles up to GA level, including Clavaria zollingeri. I have found a good-looking source I haven't used yet, but unfortunately for me, it's in Dutch. I would be ever so grateful if you could have a look at the PDF here (volume 49(4)) and let me know what info it has that's not in the article. There's no rush (plenty of other stuff to work on). Sasata ( talk) 17:04, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at an ANI thread, regarding an issue with which you may have been involved, here. Thank you ---- Steve Quinn ( talk) 18:28, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
.. I did hope one of them would do it for me. Thanks a bunch! Sandman888 ( talk) 20:17, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ucucha. So you commented on the article's FLC page a while back, and said you weren't ready to fully express your views on the article. However, I fear the article is reaching the end of its nomination, so I was hoping you can specify how you feel in terms of "Support", "Neutral" or "Oppose", or if you have a comment in which I need to fix something first. Thank you Ucucha!:)-- PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 22:03, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi there Ucucha! Thank you for your participation in the Eustrombus gigas peer review. You helped us immensely. Your comments were constructive and pertinent, and I would expect nothing less from you. Best wishes, Daniel Cavallari ( talk) 01:54, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure as to what degree your dash-fixing script is automated but during this edit a space was introduced in a <ref name="name" /> to make it <ref name="name" / > This occured in a reference contained in a table cell and really messed up the page. Just bringing this to your attention incase it was caused by your script, if it was just a user error then no worries Jebus989 ✰ 09:56, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
<font=3> Thanks again for your helpful advice.
List of longest streams of Oregon made
featured list today. Finetooth ( talk) 02:57, 24 September 2010 (UTC) |
---|
Hoi Ucucha, hope this finds you well. Listen, I just made a little sub-page for myself, User:Drmies/Roman Catholic?, where I list editors who have been making wholesale changes ("Roman Catholic" to "Catholic")--it's a regularly occurring phenomenon. I am not breaking any rules by having such a subpage, right? If I am, please delete it, but I think it's useful information and I don't know where else to put it. Thanks! Drmies ( talk) 19:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Been reading that Code for 15 years, and had never noticed that one little clause there in 35.1 - which really does seem to be the only place that specifically mentions the Code applying to superfamilies (other than the clause in 1.2.2 which does not include the principle of priority, and the clause in the princple of coordination in which a superfamily name automatically becomes available whenever anyone publishes a new family name). Embarrassing to have that pointed out, and it's also embarrassing that my failure to notice it is not unique; I know I've had conversations with other code-conversant folks who have believed (as I did up until about 10 minutes ago) that superfamilies were not subject to all of the standard Code provisions. When I have a chance here, I'll have to go in and edit my comments accordingly, although it does not lead to a different outcome regarding Dr. Lehrer's claims that Rohdendorf is the author of either Oestroidea or Sarcophagoidea; Rohdendorf is not the author of either, and is only notable for his idiosyncratic misspellings. Thanks for correcting my error, and I won't make that mistake again. Peace, Dyanega ( talk) 18:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
<font=3> Thanks for your review of the links in
Exelon Pavilions, which is now a
Featured article, and for all you do on Wikipedia! .-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) and Ruhrfisch ><>°° 20:20, 26 September 2010 (UTC) |
---|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | ||
Grace Sherwood, the Witch of Pungo, is now a FA. I couldn't have done it without you. Thanks for this and all the other articles you've provided superb copyediting on. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:11, 28 September 2010 (UTC) |
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Stevertigo 2/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Stevertigo 2/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, NW ( Talk) 17:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
I see that my first ever contribution has been censored on the grounds that it was copied from another website; not so, it was laboriously typed out from a photo of a publicly displayed notice. I do not think that this is stealing anybody's copyright. John F A Rankin ( talk) 11:22, 30 September 2010 (UTC) John Rankin
Thank you for reviewing the list at FLC. The dead link has been update with a working one, and please let me know if there are any additional concerns that need to be addressed. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 18:44, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for trying to find a solution to the sorting that works on Safari 4 [1]. I guess it didn't work out after all? I would be good to find a solution for everybody, and to be honest, I'd much rather spend my time working on fixing problems than having to argue about them. The more I look at it, the more I suspect we may need a patch to wikibits.js using appendChild to circumvent the innerHTML failure. Do you think WP:VPT be the best place to take this? -- RexxS ( talk) 18:39, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey Ucucha, regarding this comment, do you feel that my failing Bill Dane for GA was inappropriate? Grsz 11 14:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
This user unfortunately speaks en-Bureaucratese at level 4. Fifelfoo ( talk) 04:14, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't see where there is a copyright violation in your recent edit of the Battle of the Atlantic (1939–1945)-- TedColes ( talk) 08:01, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Why did you make it so that only pages were the article name is the same as the book name be italic? This excludes all pages that don't use the subtitle, like The Hobbit and all disambiguated articles. The template {{ Italic title}} is made to exclude the disambiguated part from being italic. Also would you mind doing the same for movies and television: {{ Infobox film}}, {{ Infobox television}} and {{ Infobox television film}}, Thanks. Xeworlebi ( talk) 18:58, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
At T:TDYK, can you search for "The Heidenmauer" and review the nomination? Thanks. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:43, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
there have been some additional comments. Nergaal ( talk) 19:57, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't think I've posted to an "illustrated talk page" before; there was no really suitable rodent but I think I found something suitable. Thanks for the dabcheck and running the dashes script. I have a question about the dashes I hope you can help me with; there was a time when I would change en dashes to the entity reference "–" in order to make it easier to see whether the dash was the right kind in the edit window. I don't do that any more, largely because there seems to be a preference against it; and it's fine with me either way. However, it would be handy to be able to see what kind of dash something is. Do you use, or know of, an editing tool or preference that helps with this? Thanks. Mike Christie (talk) 01:40, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ucucha. So I remember from the FA nomination page that you were thinking of maybe copy-editing the article. You see, the only real problem would be that, so I am looking for an independent editor to help out. Do you think you can? :). Thanks anyway!-- PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 00:00, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ucucha, since you participated in the failed "Butterfly" nomination, I would like your opinion. Do you think this article is better and written better? Thanks-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 17:46, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Undo your "fix" to Feature article tools, it breaks on titles using '&'. NoScript should fix their XSS protection filter and not just white-list Wikipedia URLs! — Dispenser 00:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ucucha, was wondering if you'd be able to check my latest request ... it'll be the last one I promise (for this hook) :) Sasata ( talk) 01:28, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Check Good articles/recent... looks like some of your fungi ga passes were never added. I manually put your Mycena nidificata when I added Mycena multiplicata; but a couple of your others weren't listed. Rcej (Robert) - talk 01:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Yep, Elizabeth Hurley was a fembot: Vanessa_Kensington#Austin_Powers:_The_Spy_Who_Shagged_Me — Rlevse • Talk • 02:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia doesn't know anything but names for most extinct pigs. Is hesitation in order for any suggestion that a biological family named for a central referent well represented by an English word like "pig" might contain, even if no such creature is known to science, might be assumed to contain creatures which likely would represent an intermediate form that would cause reasonable, informed people to disagree as to whether they were really (in this case "pigs") or not? In that case, there must have been "hippopigs" at some point, some of which would be in the pig-dae and others would be in the hippo-dae, and then some that would be in the gray area, even right on the line. Could this line of argument be used to caution against the idea of moving pig to Suidae, because a Suid that isn't a pig is not only possible, but probable? Chrisrus ( talk) 05:03, 10 October 2010 (UTC)