Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.
If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the many help pages.
Good luck and happy editing.``` Buster Seven Talk 20:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, TylerHRead. We
welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Ronz ( talk) 20:11, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
|
Hi TylerHRead. I'm in a rush and don't have time to address your comment in detail. I'll try to do so later.
Buster Seven has already given you good pointers on the most important policies here. The tip I give regularly is that an editor cannot go far wrong by working from sources that are both reliable and independent.
Thanks for following up with me. -- Ronz ( talk) 15:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Ok Ronz that sounds good. This is my first time responding on my own page. I just clicked edit source. Let me know what else I should do. Thanks! TylerHRead ( talk) 22:56, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Tyler
I was using information from the 24 hour fitness website as well as another large personal training company's website called custom built personal training. They both state that they accept either a certification or a degree in order to be qualified for a job as a personal trainer.
Hey Ronz, Yeah those links kind of make sense to me. Wikipedia is looking for secondary sources right. Wouldn't an article from an author that analyses health club company policies and then comes to a conclusion that most health clubs accept a degree or a certification be considered a secondary source? How would you recommend editing the page. What source would be acceptable? Thanks for your help! -Tyler
Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.
If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the many help pages.
Good luck and happy editing.``` Buster Seven Talk 20:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, TylerHRead. We
welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Ronz ( talk) 20:11, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
|
Hi TylerHRead. I'm in a rush and don't have time to address your comment in detail. I'll try to do so later.
Buster Seven has already given you good pointers on the most important policies here. The tip I give regularly is that an editor cannot go far wrong by working from sources that are both reliable and independent.
Thanks for following up with me. -- Ronz ( talk) 15:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Ok Ronz that sounds good. This is my first time responding on my own page. I just clicked edit source. Let me know what else I should do. Thanks! TylerHRead ( talk) 22:56, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Tyler
I was using information from the 24 hour fitness website as well as another large personal training company's website called custom built personal training. They both state that they accept either a certification or a degree in order to be qualified for a job as a personal trainer.
Hey Ronz, Yeah those links kind of make sense to me. Wikipedia is looking for secondary sources right. Wouldn't an article from an author that analyses health club company policies and then comes to a conclusion that most health clubs accept a degree or a certification be considered a secondary source? How would you recommend editing the page. What source would be acceptable? Thanks for your help! -Tyler