Hello! I see you are here and so am I! Well this encyclopedia is likely not the best place to hash out library safety issues. I'll see what I come up with elsewhere and I hope you'll consider doing the same. Bye for now--I just stopped in to say hello.
By the way, would you be interested in providing input on the Jackie Robinson page? I say the article makes him look like a baseball hero, which he is, but he was/is more of a hero to millions of Americans who looked up to him for his leadership in his struggle against racism. Also, look at the discussion here. Tell me what you think, if you want, or get involved, if you want. I get the impression I'm at the mercy of a bunch of children who have no conception of history beyond sports and Google. Thanks. -- LegitimateAndEvenCompelling 00:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
You made a number of useful edits to Dental floss, so I just wanted to let you know in case it's not on your watch list that some of them are being questioned on their verifiability, some even removed because of this. -- Ronz 04:23, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on
Garden Hopping, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the
criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see [[Wikipedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tyciol
User pageia:Stub#Essential information about stubs|Wikipedia:Stub]] for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on
notable subjects and should provide references to
reliable sources which
verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that
administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Kai A. Simon 12:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
I put the entries at Quint back into one section, and just wanted to let you know my reasoning behind it. True, MoS:DP#Longer_lists does indicate that on disambiguation pages with many entries, they can be split up into related sections. However, there are not all that many entries at Quint, and having them all together does not make it hard to find the appropriate article. When they were split up, it was a bit more confusing to find the correct article, as the sections created didn't quite seem to encompass all the articles. If I've misunderstood your intent, definitly let me know. Thanks, -- Natalya 22:35, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
I was actually thinking of another similar section, sorry about that. I've been trying to combat the unsourced axe grinding that seems to go on that article and I jumped the gun a bit.-- Crossmr 22:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
[1] I'm surprised stuff like this goes on without Wikipedians even knowing they are discussed... posting this here in case the person I asked about it wants to discuss, or people in general. Tyciol 21:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
I have removed the Wp links you inserted to the articles on both the mythical and historical persons who happen to share the same names as the characters in the strip. My understanding is that the author of the strip does not intend that the characters should be perceived as referring to the mythical and historical persons. This might explain why the Ganesh character made only a single appearance since any representation is perhaps too unique. Albatross2147 03:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
I noticed this page was [2] by User:Zscout370 on April 17th and again by you on April 20th (I'm guessing it was recreated by someone in that interim or something), and that there was no discussion beforehand as to why. I don't think there's evidence this was an attack page. Many positive qualities of Mr. Furey were espoused, with links to sites supporting his views even presented before ones critical of them. Furthermore, the criticisms on the page were not unsourced. It's pretty confusing, what initiated this? Furthermore, criticism serves not simply to badmouth, but to inform people of the content and healthiness of the methods. It is much like listing the dangerous of pharmaceutical drgs. Tyciol 17:18, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi - you've added this movie to Pedophilia and child sexual abuse in films. There isn't any suggestion of CSA in the original 1984 movie, but I have not seen any of the sequels. If there is clear indication of CSA in any of them can you specify which movie please, Tony 09:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Tony
A tag has been placed on Welcome to LazyTown, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that
administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- (
Cocoaguy ここがいい
contribs
talk) 20:51, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'm just looking over a bunch of your recent changes to strength training. I appreciate your enthusiasm, but there's a bunch of stuff that you've done that's counters many edits I deliberately made in the past, and a lot of original-research type stuff that really needs sources before being included in the page. I plan on having a look at the page once your done and re-working what I consider iffy, moving it to the talk page or just re-wording as I think is required. I'll leave detailed edit summaries as I make changes so you can see my reasoning. Please let me know what you think so we can up the page quality. WLU 16:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for experimenting with the page Akatsuki (Naruto) on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 06:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of taijutsu in Naruto. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 06:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to List of ninjutsu in Naruto (S-Z), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 06:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
That he is part of the Uchiha clan is irrelevant as it is never stated that he actually was from Konoha. Until we actually see him with a Konoha forehead protector or he states so, he's not. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 06:19, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Two reasons:
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Jives, by
Teh roflmaoer (
talk ·
contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Jives provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Jives, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --
Android Mouse Bot 2 14:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I am organizing a new meetup in Toronto where it will be more convinent for everyone than the current one. Please provide suggestions and feedbacks on the talk page. OhanaUnited Talk page 15:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey did you know that you are mentioned by CSO as an Ephebophilia. Jmm6f488 06:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
I've noticed you going around trying to develop a coalition to get XavierVE unbanned. Quite frankly, good luck - but I thought you should know about some of the (now deleted) history here. Xavier expressed several times his intention to continue being disruptive and making personal attacks, post links to attack pages/outing pages, and so on. I've offered him a chance already to behave and be unblocked - his response was something like "Take a long walk off a short pier". Truth be told, I'm fairly sure he has no interest in contributing (and having gone over his history quite extensively, he's said as much on occasion) and I'm fairly sure he has no interest in reforming.
Blocks aren't punitive, they're preventative - as long as XavierVE's stated intention is to be disruptive, he'll be blocked to prevent that disruption. Based on a lot of his comments, it seems that's what he wants anyways - pariah status. But I may be wrong. Feel free to pursue whatever actions you like. I just felt you should know the backstory before you did. Cheers, Wily D 17:49, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm not interested in having a "formal appeal", nor am I interested in the opinions of the administrators here. I will not compromise with you because I don't care about what you think when it comes to noting the obvious biases of individuals on the project.
...
End of the day, there's no better reason to be blocked from Wikipedia than this one. This is the best reason I could have ever imagined as it confirms the "don't ask, don't tell" acceptance of pedophile activist editors here on this project. So block away and protect the talk-page :)
— XavierVE
My email is jmm6f488@gmail.com if you want to discuss what we were talking about. Jmm6f488 07:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. Thank you. [3]-- Yankees76 04:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Asspie was deleted. Ass Pie, a redirect that you created, might be next. -- Damian Yerrick ( talk | stalk) 15:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
There are two ways to create an account on Wikipedia. One requires a graphical web browser and good eyesight. The other requires a valid e-mail address that the editor is willing to disclose to e-mail spammers who have put WP:ACC on their watchlist. For this reason, some editors of Wikipedia don't have an account at all. How should such editors contact you? -- Damian Yerrick ( talk | stalk) 15:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Ha ha, all your articles are horrible and 90% of them aren't even real. -- 85.210.42.110 19:53, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Toronto Candidate City for Wikimania 2009 |
Visit m:Wikimania 2009/Toronto for TORONTO's MetaWiki page and help build a strong bid. |
---|
-- nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 00:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Tohko Aozaki, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Tohko Aozaki satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tohko Aozaki and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Tohko Aozaki during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Hammer1980· talk 15:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
If you would like the article deleted, feel free to blank the article and then add {{db-author}}. This will cause an administrator to speedy delete the page per the author's request, since you are the only substantial contributor. Saves time compared to the AfD process. Thanks! ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 16:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Battle ball requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Clam
ster 02:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Category:Kara no Kyoukai characters, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Category:Kara no Kyoukai characters has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (
CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Category:Kara no Kyoukai characters, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk) 00:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello! I see you are here and so am I! Well this encyclopedia is likely not the best place to hash out library safety issues. I'll see what I come up with elsewhere and I hope you'll consider doing the same. Bye for now--I just stopped in to say hello.
By the way, would you be interested in providing input on the Jackie Robinson page? I say the article makes him look like a baseball hero, which he is, but he was/is more of a hero to millions of Americans who looked up to him for his leadership in his struggle against racism. Also, look at the discussion here. Tell me what you think, if you want, or get involved, if you want. I get the impression I'm at the mercy of a bunch of children who have no conception of history beyond sports and Google. Thanks. -- LegitimateAndEvenCompelling 00:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
You made a number of useful edits to Dental floss, so I just wanted to let you know in case it's not on your watch list that some of them are being questioned on their verifiability, some even removed because of this. -- Ronz 04:23, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on
Garden Hopping, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the
criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see [[Wikipedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tyciol
User pageia:Stub#Essential information about stubs|Wikipedia:Stub]] for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on
notable subjects and should provide references to
reliable sources which
verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that
administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Kai A. Simon 12:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
I put the entries at Quint back into one section, and just wanted to let you know my reasoning behind it. True, MoS:DP#Longer_lists does indicate that on disambiguation pages with many entries, they can be split up into related sections. However, there are not all that many entries at Quint, and having them all together does not make it hard to find the appropriate article. When they were split up, it was a bit more confusing to find the correct article, as the sections created didn't quite seem to encompass all the articles. If I've misunderstood your intent, definitly let me know. Thanks, -- Natalya 22:35, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
I was actually thinking of another similar section, sorry about that. I've been trying to combat the unsourced axe grinding that seems to go on that article and I jumped the gun a bit.-- Crossmr 22:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
[1] I'm surprised stuff like this goes on without Wikipedians even knowing they are discussed... posting this here in case the person I asked about it wants to discuss, or people in general. Tyciol 21:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
I have removed the Wp links you inserted to the articles on both the mythical and historical persons who happen to share the same names as the characters in the strip. My understanding is that the author of the strip does not intend that the characters should be perceived as referring to the mythical and historical persons. This might explain why the Ganesh character made only a single appearance since any representation is perhaps too unique. Albatross2147 03:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
I noticed this page was [2] by User:Zscout370 on April 17th and again by you on April 20th (I'm guessing it was recreated by someone in that interim or something), and that there was no discussion beforehand as to why. I don't think there's evidence this was an attack page. Many positive qualities of Mr. Furey were espoused, with links to sites supporting his views even presented before ones critical of them. Furthermore, the criticisms on the page were not unsourced. It's pretty confusing, what initiated this? Furthermore, criticism serves not simply to badmouth, but to inform people of the content and healthiness of the methods. It is much like listing the dangerous of pharmaceutical drgs. Tyciol 17:18, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi - you've added this movie to Pedophilia and child sexual abuse in films. There isn't any suggestion of CSA in the original 1984 movie, but I have not seen any of the sequels. If there is clear indication of CSA in any of them can you specify which movie please, Tony 09:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Tony
A tag has been placed on Welcome to LazyTown, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that
administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- (
Cocoaguy ここがいい
contribs
talk) 20:51, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'm just looking over a bunch of your recent changes to strength training. I appreciate your enthusiasm, but there's a bunch of stuff that you've done that's counters many edits I deliberately made in the past, and a lot of original-research type stuff that really needs sources before being included in the page. I plan on having a look at the page once your done and re-working what I consider iffy, moving it to the talk page or just re-wording as I think is required. I'll leave detailed edit summaries as I make changes so you can see my reasoning. Please let me know what you think so we can up the page quality. WLU 16:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for experimenting with the page Akatsuki (Naruto) on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 06:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of taijutsu in Naruto. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 06:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to List of ninjutsu in Naruto (S-Z), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 06:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
That he is part of the Uchiha clan is irrelevant as it is never stated that he actually was from Konoha. Until we actually see him with a Konoha forehead protector or he states so, he's not. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 06:19, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Two reasons:
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Jives, by
Teh roflmaoer (
talk ·
contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Jives provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Jives, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --
Android Mouse Bot 2 14:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I am organizing a new meetup in Toronto where it will be more convinent for everyone than the current one. Please provide suggestions and feedbacks on the talk page. OhanaUnited Talk page 15:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey did you know that you are mentioned by CSO as an Ephebophilia. Jmm6f488 06:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
I've noticed you going around trying to develop a coalition to get XavierVE unbanned. Quite frankly, good luck - but I thought you should know about some of the (now deleted) history here. Xavier expressed several times his intention to continue being disruptive and making personal attacks, post links to attack pages/outing pages, and so on. I've offered him a chance already to behave and be unblocked - his response was something like "Take a long walk off a short pier". Truth be told, I'm fairly sure he has no interest in contributing (and having gone over his history quite extensively, he's said as much on occasion) and I'm fairly sure he has no interest in reforming.
Blocks aren't punitive, they're preventative - as long as XavierVE's stated intention is to be disruptive, he'll be blocked to prevent that disruption. Based on a lot of his comments, it seems that's what he wants anyways - pariah status. But I may be wrong. Feel free to pursue whatever actions you like. I just felt you should know the backstory before you did. Cheers, Wily D 17:49, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm not interested in having a "formal appeal", nor am I interested in the opinions of the administrators here. I will not compromise with you because I don't care about what you think when it comes to noting the obvious biases of individuals on the project.
...
End of the day, there's no better reason to be blocked from Wikipedia than this one. This is the best reason I could have ever imagined as it confirms the "don't ask, don't tell" acceptance of pedophile activist editors here on this project. So block away and protect the talk-page :)
— XavierVE
My email is jmm6f488@gmail.com if you want to discuss what we were talking about. Jmm6f488 07:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. Thank you. [3]-- Yankees76 04:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Asspie was deleted. Ass Pie, a redirect that you created, might be next. -- Damian Yerrick ( talk | stalk) 15:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
There are two ways to create an account on Wikipedia. One requires a graphical web browser and good eyesight. The other requires a valid e-mail address that the editor is willing to disclose to e-mail spammers who have put WP:ACC on their watchlist. For this reason, some editors of Wikipedia don't have an account at all. How should such editors contact you? -- Damian Yerrick ( talk | stalk) 15:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Ha ha, all your articles are horrible and 90% of them aren't even real. -- 85.210.42.110 19:53, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Toronto Candidate City for Wikimania 2009 |
Visit m:Wikimania 2009/Toronto for TORONTO's MetaWiki page and help build a strong bid. |
---|
-- nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 00:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Tohko Aozaki, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Tohko Aozaki satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tohko Aozaki and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Tohko Aozaki during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Hammer1980· talk 15:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
If you would like the article deleted, feel free to blank the article and then add {{db-author}}. This will cause an administrator to speedy delete the page per the author's request, since you are the only substantial contributor. Saves time compared to the AfD process. Thanks! ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 16:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Battle ball requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Clam
ster 02:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Category:Kara no Kyoukai characters, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Category:Kara no Kyoukai characters has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (
CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Category:Kara no Kyoukai characters, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk) 00:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)