![]() | |
Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #83 |
Tags have been placed on
Mickey Madden(Singer) and
Jesse Carmichael(Singer), requesting that they be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the
criteria for speedy deletion, because they are very short articles providing little or no context to the reader. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on
notable subjects and should provide references to
reliable sources that
verify their content. Additionally, neither Madden nor Carmichael are singers. They are a bassist and a keyboardist, respectfully. Lastly, the correct formatting for titles puts a space between the last letter of the name and the opening parenthesis.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you want to dispute this request, affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the nominated page(s) and state your intention on the article
talk page(s). Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this..
Regards,
LaraLove
Talk/
Contribs
06:02, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Jenn Thomas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that
administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Адам12901
T/
C
00:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as
Jenn Campbell, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our
policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Slp1
01:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to
George W. Bush. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use
Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you.
Mbc
362
03:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to George W. Bush. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Leuko 03:53, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to
The Rolling Stones. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.--
John
20:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I notice you introduced a flag icon to the article on The Rolling Stones. I had recently removed it after raising the matter at the relevant discussion page ( Talk:The Rolling Stones#Flag). Would you mind discussing there before adding this again? Thanks. -- John 20:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete notices unless you have responded to these requests. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 20:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
![]() | Please don't add contentious material as you did to the Cary Grant article. It's major POV. |
I started a WP for the Stones. Please join and spread the word. Stan weller 06:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
I don't understand why you deleted the Jewish category from their pages. Maybe you are in denial or something, but the fact is that they are part Jewish. Live with it.-- Goodfellajohnny 07:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Where do I begin? First off it's "you're", not "your". Also, it's "their mother", not "there mother". Right, so who's the idiot again? You just did the math yourself. You did the math wrong though. That would mean the kids are roughly 15%. Whether you like it or not they have Jewish blood. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Goodfellajohnny (
talk •
contribs)
04:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Please make sure that you include a descriptive edit summary with any edit, even one that you deem to be minor, to assist other editors and admins in checking diffs. It is particularly helpful when pages are still in development by their primary contributor. [1] Esradekan 13:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC).
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to
White American, you will be
blocked from editing.
JScott06
23:27, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Karis Jagger, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}}
to the top of
Karis Jagger. ...
discospinster
talk
01:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated Karis Jagger, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karis Jagger. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ... discospinster talk 22:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Burning Up Tour was helpful to building more articles for Wikipedia, but please use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. calliegal_x ( talk) 00:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Calliegal
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Don't Forget, you will be
blocked from editing.
Please do not attack other editors, as you did with this edit to: User talk:Nikiangelz. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Edgehead 5150 02:44, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated List of J.O.N.A.S episodes, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of J.O.N.A.S episodes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. roux 01:49, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
That site you added as a reference is using an early version of the wiki article as its source of information. -- NrDg 16:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
People is a gossip magazine, not a reliable source. I have looked for reliable sources on her relationship status in vain. You were right to remove Brazilian citizenship - that was unsourced, and I couldn't find any sources that said it. Fences and windows ( talk) 05:01, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I notice that in some infoboxes you've been changing from "U.S." to USA. You may not be aware of this, but we do not link to commonly known words, such as major geographical locations, and the United States is certainly a well-enough known country that it does not require linking. It's all explained in WP:OVERLINK. Thanks Rossrs ( talk) 07:26, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to
Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an
edit summary for your edits. Thank you.
NrDg
15:57, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
I see that you do not use edit summaries at all. Please consider leaving one when you remove sourced content as you have at least twice now on the Nick Jonas article. Your actions could be considered disrubtive and could lead to a block. A new name 2008 ( talk) 11:16, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Nick Jonas. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. See my reply to your messages on my talk page as well.
NrDg
22:11, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
You should probably take a look here to see why I keep removing United States from her birthplace. By reverting my edits, you are going against Wikipedia manual of style, and I advise you stop before you get blocked for unproductive edit warring. Pokerdance ( talk/ contribs) 16:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in
Selena Gomez, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Also, please do not
assume ownership of articles.
POKERdance
talk/
contribs
00:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from abusing
warning or blocking templates, as you did to
User talk:Pokerdance. Doing so is a violation of
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the
user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our
introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia.
POKERdance
talk/
contribs
03:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Please stop abusing
warning or blocking templates, as you did to
User talk:Pokerdance. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stop copying warnings that I have issued you legitimately, and posting them on my talk page for no reason.
POKERdance
talk/
contribs
16:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you abuse a
warning or blocking template, as you did to
User talk:Pokerdance, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
POKERdance
talk/
contribs
02:24, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
You've also been reported to WP:AIV for persistent vandalism. POKERdance talk/ contribs 02:38, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
POKERdance talk/ contribs 02:45, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you abuse a
warning or blocking template, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Tan |
39
03:03, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below.
Mifter (
talk)
03:27, 8 August 2009 (UTC)I have nominated Category:Songs that reached number one on CCM chart ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Tweetsabird!
I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!
It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!
Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!
Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch ( talk) 18:36, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Tweetsabird. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | |
Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #83 |
Tags have been placed on
Mickey Madden(Singer) and
Jesse Carmichael(Singer), requesting that they be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the
criteria for speedy deletion, because they are very short articles providing little or no context to the reader. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on
notable subjects and should provide references to
reliable sources that
verify their content. Additionally, neither Madden nor Carmichael are singers. They are a bassist and a keyboardist, respectfully. Lastly, the correct formatting for titles puts a space between the last letter of the name and the opening parenthesis.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you want to dispute this request, affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the nominated page(s) and state your intention on the article
talk page(s). Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this..
Regards,
LaraLove
Talk/
Contribs
06:02, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Jenn Thomas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that
administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Адам12901
T/
C
00:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as
Jenn Campbell, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our
policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Slp1
01:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to
George W. Bush. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use
Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you.
Mbc
362
03:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to George W. Bush. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Leuko 03:53, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to
The Rolling Stones. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.--
John
20:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I notice you introduced a flag icon to the article on The Rolling Stones. I had recently removed it after raising the matter at the relevant discussion page ( Talk:The Rolling Stones#Flag). Would you mind discussing there before adding this again? Thanks. -- John 20:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete notices unless you have responded to these requests. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 20:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
![]() | Please don't add contentious material as you did to the Cary Grant article. It's major POV. |
I started a WP for the Stones. Please join and spread the word. Stan weller 06:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
I don't understand why you deleted the Jewish category from their pages. Maybe you are in denial or something, but the fact is that they are part Jewish. Live with it.-- Goodfellajohnny 07:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Where do I begin? First off it's "you're", not "your". Also, it's "their mother", not "there mother". Right, so who's the idiot again? You just did the math yourself. You did the math wrong though. That would mean the kids are roughly 15%. Whether you like it or not they have Jewish blood. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Goodfellajohnny (
talk •
contribs)
04:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Please make sure that you include a descriptive edit summary with any edit, even one that you deem to be minor, to assist other editors and admins in checking diffs. It is particularly helpful when pages are still in development by their primary contributor. [1] Esradekan 13:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC).
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to
White American, you will be
blocked from editing.
JScott06
23:27, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Karis Jagger, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}}
to the top of
Karis Jagger. ...
discospinster
talk
01:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated Karis Jagger, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karis Jagger. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ... discospinster talk 22:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Burning Up Tour was helpful to building more articles for Wikipedia, but please use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. calliegal_x ( talk) 00:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Calliegal
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Don't Forget, you will be
blocked from editing.
Please do not attack other editors, as you did with this edit to: User talk:Nikiangelz. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Edgehead 5150 02:44, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated List of J.O.N.A.S episodes, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of J.O.N.A.S episodes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. roux 01:49, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
That site you added as a reference is using an early version of the wiki article as its source of information. -- NrDg 16:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
People is a gossip magazine, not a reliable source. I have looked for reliable sources on her relationship status in vain. You were right to remove Brazilian citizenship - that was unsourced, and I couldn't find any sources that said it. Fences and windows ( talk) 05:01, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I notice that in some infoboxes you've been changing from "U.S." to USA. You may not be aware of this, but we do not link to commonly known words, such as major geographical locations, and the United States is certainly a well-enough known country that it does not require linking. It's all explained in WP:OVERLINK. Thanks Rossrs ( talk) 07:26, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to
Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an
edit summary for your edits. Thank you.
NrDg
15:57, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
I see that you do not use edit summaries at all. Please consider leaving one when you remove sourced content as you have at least twice now on the Nick Jonas article. Your actions could be considered disrubtive and could lead to a block. A new name 2008 ( talk) 11:16, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Nick Jonas. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. See my reply to your messages on my talk page as well.
NrDg
22:11, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
You should probably take a look here to see why I keep removing United States from her birthplace. By reverting my edits, you are going against Wikipedia manual of style, and I advise you stop before you get blocked for unproductive edit warring. Pokerdance ( talk/ contribs) 16:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in
Selena Gomez, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Also, please do not
assume ownership of articles.
POKERdance
talk/
contribs
00:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from abusing
warning or blocking templates, as you did to
User talk:Pokerdance. Doing so is a violation of
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the
user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our
introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia.
POKERdance
talk/
contribs
03:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Please stop abusing
warning or blocking templates, as you did to
User talk:Pokerdance. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stop copying warnings that I have issued you legitimately, and posting them on my talk page for no reason.
POKERdance
talk/
contribs
16:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you abuse a
warning or blocking template, as you did to
User talk:Pokerdance, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
POKERdance
talk/
contribs
02:24, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
You've also been reported to WP:AIV for persistent vandalism. POKERdance talk/ contribs 02:38, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
POKERdance talk/ contribs 02:45, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you abuse a
warning or blocking template, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Tan |
39
03:03, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below.
Mifter (
talk)
03:27, 8 August 2009 (UTC)I have nominated Category:Songs that reached number one on CCM chart ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Tweetsabird!
I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!
It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!
Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!
Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch ( talk) 18:36, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Tweetsabird. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)