From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:SHUTTLE LAB. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 17:07, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies ( talk) 17:08, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with SHUTTLE LAB. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot   t •  c »  03:45, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

The recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SHUTTLE LAB has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Ankit Maity Talkcontribs 14:47, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian ( talk) 17:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Truthtruthtruthany1 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I am a new user and I have just reviewed the terms, I am now understand that blanking page is prohibited on wiki and I will follow this guideline thereafter. Truthtruthtruthany1 ( talk) 17:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

If you didn't understand that after all the warnings and the previous block, I find it hard to believe you do now Jac16888 Talk 19:29, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Truthtruthtruthany1 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I appreciate if you do believe now I will comply with this rule thereafter as I've just had a chance to study the guideline thoughtfully and digested the meaning behind it is to keep wiki consensus Truthtruthtruthany1 ( talk) 21:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

You have created a single purpose account, and probably one sockpuppet account. This account (Truthtruthtruthany1) has been blocked twice and for good reasons. You have consistently vandalized Wikipedia and not done anything else, and you have not been open to discussion at any time in the process. I do not believe that you can contribute anything useful to Wikipedia at the moment. olivier ( talk) 11:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Truthtruthtruthany1 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I am a new user and didn't understand well the rules and guideline while I was editing the topic I've created, I didn't aware blanking pages is strictly prohibited and it's impact to wiki's consensus. As I have mentioned I have studied the guideline extensively while suspension and I hope I can get a favor to contribute to wiki once again. Truthtruthtruthany1 ( talk) 16:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

The main reason for your being blocked is your attitude, and the list of issues is long: vandalism, sockpupettry, spamming, and now abuse of the appeal function. I am blocking you from all editing, including editing this page, indefinitely. olivier ( talk) 16:58, 17 December 2011 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:SHUTTLE LAB. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 17:07, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies ( talk) 17:08, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with SHUTTLE LAB. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot   t •  c »  03:45, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

The recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SHUTTLE LAB has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Ankit Maity Talkcontribs 14:47, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian ( talk) 17:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Truthtruthtruthany1 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I am a new user and I have just reviewed the terms, I am now understand that blanking page is prohibited on wiki and I will follow this guideline thereafter. Truthtruthtruthany1 ( talk) 17:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

If you didn't understand that after all the warnings and the previous block, I find it hard to believe you do now Jac16888 Talk 19:29, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Truthtruthtruthany1 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I appreciate if you do believe now I will comply with this rule thereafter as I've just had a chance to study the guideline thoughtfully and digested the meaning behind it is to keep wiki consensus Truthtruthtruthany1 ( talk) 21:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

You have created a single purpose account, and probably one sockpuppet account. This account (Truthtruthtruthany1) has been blocked twice and for good reasons. You have consistently vandalized Wikipedia and not done anything else, and you have not been open to discussion at any time in the process. I do not believe that you can contribute anything useful to Wikipedia at the moment. olivier ( talk) 11:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Truthtruthtruthany1 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I am a new user and didn't understand well the rules and guideline while I was editing the topic I've created, I didn't aware blanking pages is strictly prohibited and it's impact to wiki's consensus. As I have mentioned I have studied the guideline extensively while suspension and I hope I can get a favor to contribute to wiki once again. Truthtruthtruthany1 ( talk) 16:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

The main reason for your being blocked is your attitude, and the list of issues is long: vandalism, sockpupettry, spamming, and now abuse of the appeal function. I am blocking you from all editing, including editing this page, indefinitely. olivier ( talk) 16:58, 17 December 2011 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook