I'll be back
I'm going to edit alot of pages from alot of accounts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truth0990 ( talk • contribs) 18:20, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Nope it's a quarantine. I got nothing but time
Hello, I'm Eagles247. I noticed that you recently removed content from Zach Moore without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:56, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Zach Moore shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:58, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Truth0990 reported by User:Eagles247 (Result: ). Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:47, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ian.thomson (
talk)
23:08, 14 March 2020 (UTC)False information Truth0990 ( talk) 23:55, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ian.thomson (
talk)
23:11, 16 March 2020 (UTC)For the same reason as last time, but this time indefinitely.
You, as a person, are no longer welcome to edit the site until you can read the instructions from your past two blocks and follow them. Ian.thomson ( talk) 22:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
I'll be back
I'm going to edit alot of pages from alot of accounts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truth0990 ( talk • contribs) 18:20, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Nope it's a quarantine. I got nothing but time
Hello, I'm Eagles247. I noticed that you recently removed content from Zach Moore without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:56, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Zach Moore shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:58, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Truth0990 reported by User:Eagles247 (Result: ). Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:47, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ian.thomson (
talk)
23:08, 14 March 2020 (UTC)False information Truth0990 ( talk) 23:55, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ian.thomson (
talk)
23:11, 16 March 2020 (UTC)For the same reason as last time, but this time indefinitely.
You, as a person, are no longer welcome to edit the site until you can read the instructions from your past two blocks and follow them. Ian.thomson ( talk) 22:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)