Nice to have another significant contributor on the Electrical sensitivity page, it's particularly good to have input from the IT industry that is balanced and open-minded. Hyperman 42 08:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Just in case your ears are burning, you're being talked about on the ES talk page. I hope I haven't got my facts wrong, a quick Google of you gave me the information. I'll remove it if you like - I should have asked first I guess so sorry about that. I intentionally didn't put your name in as there was no need. I think the wikipedian I was replying to has an odd opinion of us both (although he likes you!) Cheers. 82.10.218.4 09:53, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you have an interest in electrical sensitivity and that your involved with powerwatch. There is a considerable amount of changes that I have made to the article which are being debated. The two revisions are:
1)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Electrical_sensitivity&oldid=219166365
2)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Electrical_sensitivity&oldid=219165795
If you could spare the time to take a look at these changes your views and comments would be much appreciated! -- Randomized ( talk) 10:18, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind remarks on my talk page. They speak well to your admirable view as to the conduct and discourse that should be employed on Wikipedia. There are many active, thoughtful and courteous editors on WP (even more so than I!); I am hopeful they also receive encouragement from time to time like that you have provided. papageno ( talk) 15:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Good work! Thanks. I'd give you a barnstar if I knew what they were. -- SesquipedalianVerbiage ( talk) 08:30, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Topazg,
I know you haven't edited for a few months, but if you get this note in the next few days, I'd love to have your comments at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Usability_of_Keiffets_review. Thanks, WhatamIdoing ( talk) 17:00, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Pere et fils editing, wow! ;-) All kidding aside, welcome back to WP. -- papageno ( talk) 22:12, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to
Mobile phone radiation and health: you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.
-
Garrett W. {
☎
✍} 11:23, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nice to have another significant contributor on the Electrical sensitivity page, it's particularly good to have input from the IT industry that is balanced and open-minded. Hyperman 42 08:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Just in case your ears are burning, you're being talked about on the ES talk page. I hope I haven't got my facts wrong, a quick Google of you gave me the information. I'll remove it if you like - I should have asked first I guess so sorry about that. I intentionally didn't put your name in as there was no need. I think the wikipedian I was replying to has an odd opinion of us both (although he likes you!) Cheers. 82.10.218.4 09:53, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you have an interest in electrical sensitivity and that your involved with powerwatch. There is a considerable amount of changes that I have made to the article which are being debated. The two revisions are:
1)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Electrical_sensitivity&oldid=219166365
2)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Electrical_sensitivity&oldid=219165795
If you could spare the time to take a look at these changes your views and comments would be much appreciated! -- Randomized ( talk) 10:18, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind remarks on my talk page. They speak well to your admirable view as to the conduct and discourse that should be employed on Wikipedia. There are many active, thoughtful and courteous editors on WP (even more so than I!); I am hopeful they also receive encouragement from time to time like that you have provided. papageno ( talk) 15:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Good work! Thanks. I'd give you a barnstar if I knew what they were. -- SesquipedalianVerbiage ( talk) 08:30, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Topazg,
I know you haven't edited for a few months, but if you get this note in the next few days, I'd love to have your comments at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Usability_of_Keiffets_review. Thanks, WhatamIdoing ( talk) 17:00, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Pere et fils editing, wow! ;-) All kidding aside, welcome back to WP. -- papageno ( talk) 22:12, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to
Mobile phone radiation and health: you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.
-
Garrett W. {
☎
✍} 11:23, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)