From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Toolmusik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date. -- Jrefeee

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

MBisanzBot ( talk) 03:16, 23 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Notability of John Kilduff

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on John Kilduff, by Calton ( talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because John Kilduff seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting John Kilduff, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. -- Android Mouse Bot 2 00:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC) reply

John Kilduff article

If you still are interested in developing a John Kilduff article, you should use material from the below references to keep the article from being deleted again:

-- Jreferee ( Talk) 02:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC) reply

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Hillary Rodham Clinton has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana| Parlez ici 17:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC) reply

June 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Katie Holmes. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Star dust 8212 23:35, 17 June 2008 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Toolmusik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date. -- Jrefeee

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

MBisanzBot ( talk) 03:16, 23 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Notability of John Kilduff

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on John Kilduff, by Calton ( talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because John Kilduff seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting John Kilduff, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. -- Android Mouse Bot 2 00:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC) reply

John Kilduff article

If you still are interested in developing a John Kilduff article, you should use material from the below references to keep the article from being deleted again:

-- Jreferee ( Talk) 02:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC) reply

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Hillary Rodham Clinton has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana| Parlez ici 17:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC) reply

June 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Katie Holmes. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Star dust 8212 23:35, 17 June 2008 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook