Only at first sight; try our tutorial.
Lectonar ( talk) 08:41, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello, please note that although you are free to use the Wikipedia "Email user" option to contact me, I strongly prefer communicating with other users via our respective user talk pages, and only respond via email if you are contacting me with a private matter. I do not consider your issue with the Northern Cyprus article to be a private matter.
Now that that's out of the way, in response to the comments in your email, I did look at the edit request you placed on Talk:Northern Cyprus and responded there. It looks like the consensus was that your proposed wording gave undue weight to the subject of your edit request. One user did indicate that s/he is somewhat familiar with the situation you described and was open to adding the proposed subject matter if it was trimmed to an appropriate size. You might want to touch base with that user. If you have a specific question regarding anything I or any of the other users who responded to your edit request said on that talk page, please ask there. Thanks! — KuyaBriBri Talk 00:17, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello. KuyaBriBri, this is very helpful, thank you, and hopefully I am now communicating with you through the correct Methods. I too thought my addition to the page would be too long, and I would be happy to make it far shorter and to the point, giving the public readers a chance to understand the point without getting bogged down.
However, I am at a loss as to how I contact the "user". I shall try to look at the page notes, and talk pages, to see if I can identify this person, and contact her through the talk page.
If you can help me further with this, I would appreciate, although in the meantime I will try to research further as to who the user is.
Kind regards, and thank you again.
ToZero ToZero ( talk) 17:50, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the note on my talk page. My take on this issue is that the amount of detail you propose for what is really a small part of events in this area is WP:UNDUE, which is to say it gives excessive weight to the issues involved. Add this to the idea that most people reading it will think you have an axe to grind in a controversial area, whether you actually have or not. They will see a lot ot intricate work involved in attracting a load of potential criticism for very little reward in a controversial area with a history of trouble. If you have not succeeded in garnering help in three months, this should tell you something, although I'm afraid it may not be what you want to hear. Britmax ( talk) 13:11, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
You should try to address each reason for denial every time you re-submit... or you could just put the ignore the AFC process, publish it anyway and see if it survives. either way, good luck!
Ryan shell ( talk) 01:05, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello again. I've taken a look at your AFC and it seems to be in ok shape. Have you re-submitted it for evaluation after you added references to each line? If you haven't, try that. If you have done that, you might consider creatign the article on your own to see if it sinks or floats as is. either way, good luck. Ryan shell ( talk) 20:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Dear Excirial,
Thank you for your recent review of my short article on North Cyprus Page.
May I say that I am pleased that an editor/reviewer has left slightly more telling clues than before. Thank you for your comment.
In reply to your comment, I would have written more about situation, and given more background, but unfortunately, I was knocked back for not having provided evidence/sources to substantiate my version of events.
Therefore, I put together a small number of articles and videos and other sources, and took a sentence from each of them and quoted it in the article, in such a way as to start the article in some form. However, it has obviously not worked as it has this time been knocked back for reading like a news article.
It would be a shame for me to give up, considering, it is a compelling story which affects 3000 lives directly in a serious (life threatening way) and if you include their families and children (mainly back in the UK)the events are having a secondary affect on them.
Please, could you simply drop, one, or mabye 2 more subtle, clues, hints, indications, for me to continue improving the article.
Kind regards,
ToZero 62.197.212.212 ( talk) 11:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Akfinans Manager Ertu Kader, breaking and entering an occupied Kulaksiz Home.jpg, which you've sourced to Kibris Newspaper TRNC and Cyprus Today Newspaper TRNC. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Dear Excirial,
Thank you for your recent review of my short article on North Cyprus Page.
May I say that I am pleased that an editor/reviewer has left slightly more telling clues than before. Thank you for your comment.
In reply to your comment, I would have written more about situation, and given more background, but unfortunately, I was knocked back for not having provided evidence/sources to substantiate my version of events.
Therefore, I put together a small number of articles and videos and other sources, and took a sentence from each of them and quoted it in the article, in such a way as to start the article in some form. However, it has obviously not worked as it has this time been knocked back for reading like a news article.
It would be a shame for me to give up, considering, it is a compelling story which affects 3000 lives directly in a serious (life threatening way) and if you include their families and children (mainly back in the UK)the events are having a secondary affect on them.
Please, could you simply drop, one, or mabye 2 more subtle, clues, hints, indications, for me to continue improving the article.
Kind regards,
ToZero 62.197.212.212 ( talk) 11:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:59, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kulaksiz 5 Court Cases, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 19:01, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello ToZero. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Kulaksiz 5 Court Cases.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kulaksiz 5 Court Cases}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 20:33, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Elon Musk. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as " edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers ( talk) 13:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
I have not reverted my contribution has been repeatedly reverted. I have given the reasons on the Talk page and supplied evidence. I have not reverted one time. Please remove this warning As you have given it on the grounds that I have either reverted or I’m done. I repeat I have not undergone anything and I haven’t reverted anything. ToZero ( talk) 13:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
ToZero ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
There is no grounds for blocking. I've done nothing to justify blocking. Please remove all blocks. Disagreements of editing were 2 years ago, and my edits, in terms of Covid 19 Truths applied to the edit, are now FULLY VINDICATED by science, reality and facts
Decline reason:
This account is not, and never has been, directly blocked. If you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla ( talk) 22:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Only at first sight; try our tutorial.
Lectonar ( talk) 08:41, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello, please note that although you are free to use the Wikipedia "Email user" option to contact me, I strongly prefer communicating with other users via our respective user talk pages, and only respond via email if you are contacting me with a private matter. I do not consider your issue with the Northern Cyprus article to be a private matter.
Now that that's out of the way, in response to the comments in your email, I did look at the edit request you placed on Talk:Northern Cyprus and responded there. It looks like the consensus was that your proposed wording gave undue weight to the subject of your edit request. One user did indicate that s/he is somewhat familiar with the situation you described and was open to adding the proposed subject matter if it was trimmed to an appropriate size. You might want to touch base with that user. If you have a specific question regarding anything I or any of the other users who responded to your edit request said on that talk page, please ask there. Thanks! — KuyaBriBri Talk 00:17, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello. KuyaBriBri, this is very helpful, thank you, and hopefully I am now communicating with you through the correct Methods. I too thought my addition to the page would be too long, and I would be happy to make it far shorter and to the point, giving the public readers a chance to understand the point without getting bogged down.
However, I am at a loss as to how I contact the "user". I shall try to look at the page notes, and talk pages, to see if I can identify this person, and contact her through the talk page.
If you can help me further with this, I would appreciate, although in the meantime I will try to research further as to who the user is.
Kind regards, and thank you again.
ToZero ToZero ( talk) 17:50, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the note on my talk page. My take on this issue is that the amount of detail you propose for what is really a small part of events in this area is WP:UNDUE, which is to say it gives excessive weight to the issues involved. Add this to the idea that most people reading it will think you have an axe to grind in a controversial area, whether you actually have or not. They will see a lot ot intricate work involved in attracting a load of potential criticism for very little reward in a controversial area with a history of trouble. If you have not succeeded in garnering help in three months, this should tell you something, although I'm afraid it may not be what you want to hear. Britmax ( talk) 13:11, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
You should try to address each reason for denial every time you re-submit... or you could just put the ignore the AFC process, publish it anyway and see if it survives. either way, good luck!
Ryan shell ( talk) 01:05, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello again. I've taken a look at your AFC and it seems to be in ok shape. Have you re-submitted it for evaluation after you added references to each line? If you haven't, try that. If you have done that, you might consider creatign the article on your own to see if it sinks or floats as is. either way, good luck. Ryan shell ( talk) 20:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Dear Excirial,
Thank you for your recent review of my short article on North Cyprus Page.
May I say that I am pleased that an editor/reviewer has left slightly more telling clues than before. Thank you for your comment.
In reply to your comment, I would have written more about situation, and given more background, but unfortunately, I was knocked back for not having provided evidence/sources to substantiate my version of events.
Therefore, I put together a small number of articles and videos and other sources, and took a sentence from each of them and quoted it in the article, in such a way as to start the article in some form. However, it has obviously not worked as it has this time been knocked back for reading like a news article.
It would be a shame for me to give up, considering, it is a compelling story which affects 3000 lives directly in a serious (life threatening way) and if you include their families and children (mainly back in the UK)the events are having a secondary affect on them.
Please, could you simply drop, one, or mabye 2 more subtle, clues, hints, indications, for me to continue improving the article.
Kind regards,
ToZero 62.197.212.212 ( talk) 11:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Akfinans Manager Ertu Kader, breaking and entering an occupied Kulaksiz Home.jpg, which you've sourced to Kibris Newspaper TRNC and Cyprus Today Newspaper TRNC. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Dear Excirial,
Thank you for your recent review of my short article on North Cyprus Page.
May I say that I am pleased that an editor/reviewer has left slightly more telling clues than before. Thank you for your comment.
In reply to your comment, I would have written more about situation, and given more background, but unfortunately, I was knocked back for not having provided evidence/sources to substantiate my version of events.
Therefore, I put together a small number of articles and videos and other sources, and took a sentence from each of them and quoted it in the article, in such a way as to start the article in some form. However, it has obviously not worked as it has this time been knocked back for reading like a news article.
It would be a shame for me to give up, considering, it is a compelling story which affects 3000 lives directly in a serious (life threatening way) and if you include their families and children (mainly back in the UK)the events are having a secondary affect on them.
Please, could you simply drop, one, or mabye 2 more subtle, clues, hints, indications, for me to continue improving the article.
Kind regards,
ToZero 62.197.212.212 ( talk) 11:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:59, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kulaksiz 5 Court Cases, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 19:01, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello ToZero. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Kulaksiz 5 Court Cases.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kulaksiz 5 Court Cases}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 20:33, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Elon Musk. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as " edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers ( talk) 13:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
I have not reverted my contribution has been repeatedly reverted. I have given the reasons on the Talk page and supplied evidence. I have not reverted one time. Please remove this warning As you have given it on the grounds that I have either reverted or I’m done. I repeat I have not undergone anything and I haven’t reverted anything. ToZero ( talk) 13:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
ToZero ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
There is no grounds for blocking. I've done nothing to justify blocking. Please remove all blocks. Disagreements of editing were 2 years ago, and my edits, in terms of Covid 19 Truths applied to the edit, are now FULLY VINDICATED by science, reality and facts
Decline reason:
This account is not, and never has been, directly blocked. If you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla ( talk) 22:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.