|
Kuki ni 14:47, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled " Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.
- Will Beback 21:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Hey Tlatosmd, thanks for your contributions to the Pedophile activism article. It's nice to have someone knowledgeable editing it. JayW 19:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Do you have a cite on the coinage of "ephebophilia" by Hirschfeld? DanB†DanD 21:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
You would need a citation to call into question the scientific validity of DSM etcetera. Perhaps you should just add a see also section. Lotusduck 23:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC) IPCE is not a reviewed journal. As an organization it is only a reliable source on the IPCE. Lotusduck 19:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi "Georges is 17, while Alexandre is 10, and their relationship lasts for all of Georges's time in high-school until Georges is 20" Are you sure about this? I haven't watched the movie for a year or so, but I don't remember Georges being this old. He is certainly, as you say, older than in the book. Samll pooint - not sure you should use the American expression 'High School'. Tony 12:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Tony
are you a nonce? -- 193.35.133.151, 13:36, 22 May 2007 (not self-identified, had to be identified by page history)
When you present an argument on Wikipedia that you are loosing through weight of numbers, the best tactic is to side step the issue. If your argument was to be successful then an WP:ADF would need to be raised, and the chances are at the moment that you would not gain 75% consensus for deletion. But if a change of name could accomplish the same thing, then problem solved! But "while it would have to be re-written as a piece on the personal title" may be true, stating the obvious, when there are others who hold contrary views and need to be persuaded that a new name is in everyone's interests, does not help. FYI a nonce in UK slang is a child molester. -- Philip Baird Shearer 16:46, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
That was not my comment. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 13:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
There is no point being a Dylan fan if you insist on putting others down to make Dylan seem worthier. He wouldn't like it, y'know... -- andreasegde 18:03, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
I agree that these pages look obviously "owned" by single-purpose POV editing accounts like User:Abuse truth (the username doesn't even try to hide it), but unfortunately I don't really have the time/energy to fight with them at the moment. Hopefully someone will, and thanks for pointing it out. -- Delirium 18:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
To tell you the truth, I'm actually kind of sad that you didn't quote me in your recent critique of SqueakBox's editing behavior on the Talk Page for the Adult-child sex article. Still, kudos for stepping up to point out some of the follies in this editor's editing practices. However, that Talk Page may not be the best place for this critique - you may want to move this particular discussion SqueakBox and you are having to a User Talk Page, either his or yours. ~ Homologeo 07:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Please do not make personal attacks, including comments like this. [1] Personal attacks are disruptive, and may result in your editing privileges being blocked. In the future, it's best to avoid commenting on editors. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 08:50, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Please see this ANI thread. — xDanielx T/ C 11:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Copied from the thread there:
Hi Tlatosmd. Unfortunately I think I must bow out; too disillusioned by my Wikipedia experience. I had hoped that I could make some useful contribution, but realize now that I was being naïve. I can spend countless hours (and I know that you have spent even more) attempting to bring some valuable material to the pages, but then Squeakbox, Pol64 and Photouploaded drop by, and in just a couple of minutes, they insult editors, revert the work they have done, and refuse to provide sources for their assertions (although, of course, they don't need to verify, because they are speaking "the truth"). Wikipedia does nothing to prevent this; I guess it will achieve the quality of output it deserves.
Anyway, just wanted to say thanks for your contributions, from which I have been learning a great deal - your depth of knowledge on the subject is vast, and incredibly inspiring. I am now looking forward to following up on many of the references you have mentioned - in the relative peace of my own quiet research! Under different circumstances...
My best wishes, Strichmann ( talk) 07:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to urge you not to feed the troll on the PPA talkpage. That rarely helps, and I don't see much good coming from that discussion. Martijn Hoekstra 16:27, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
You have a great work going at User:Tlatosmd/Adult-child sex. Would you take a look at this version of the article Adult-child sex? The version has been gradually chopped of to nothingness eventually. May be you would also like to have all the material and references of that version incorporated into your workpage version. BTW, will be it be alright if an outsider wants to collaborate? At least on the talk page of the workpage? I may be interested to volunteer. Cheers. Aditya( talk • contribs) 16:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I've replied to your question about moral turpitude on the article talk page. I'll go back and try to add some comments about the rating. Aleta (Sing) 02:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I've commented briefly on the mythology comments page, and slightly less briefly on the LGBT peer review page. Aleta (Sing) 03:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that, due to rising tensions surrounding the ACS article and its current AfD, and because of disregard for proper Wikipedia procedure and policies by a number of regular editors and admins, you have decided to withdraw either permanently or temporarily from editing associated with this article. VigilancePrime and Pairadox have chosen to take a similar course of action. This saddens me, because contributions by upstanding Wikipedians such as yourselves are very helpful in the improvement process of controversial articles such as this. Your assistance will be greatly missed, if you choose to leave or hold back on editing the ACS article. Considering prior repeated attempts by select editors to ignore and violate Wikipedia policies and to do whatever is possible to destroy this piece, your civil, well-balanced, and rational editing will definitely be needed, no matter the outcome of the AfD. Although I realize that it is difficult to contribute when so many violations and incivilities are taking place, I urge you to return to this article as soon as you can. I will personally be happy to see you return, and I'm sure the article will be the better for it as well. Best regards, ~ Homologeo ( talk) 04:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
User:Tlatosmd/Adult-child sex, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tlatosmd/Adult-child sex and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Tlatosmd/Adult-child sex during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy ( Help!) 22:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
You, as an admitted doppelganger of User:TlatoSMD, who is indef blocked, are also indef blocked. See the other account's talk page for more info. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Kuki ni 14:47, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled " Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.
- Will Beback 21:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Hey Tlatosmd, thanks for your contributions to the Pedophile activism article. It's nice to have someone knowledgeable editing it. JayW 19:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Do you have a cite on the coinage of "ephebophilia" by Hirschfeld? DanB†DanD 21:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
You would need a citation to call into question the scientific validity of DSM etcetera. Perhaps you should just add a see also section. Lotusduck 23:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC) IPCE is not a reviewed journal. As an organization it is only a reliable source on the IPCE. Lotusduck 19:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi "Georges is 17, while Alexandre is 10, and their relationship lasts for all of Georges's time in high-school until Georges is 20" Are you sure about this? I haven't watched the movie for a year or so, but I don't remember Georges being this old. He is certainly, as you say, older than in the book. Samll pooint - not sure you should use the American expression 'High School'. Tony 12:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Tony
are you a nonce? -- 193.35.133.151, 13:36, 22 May 2007 (not self-identified, had to be identified by page history)
When you present an argument on Wikipedia that you are loosing through weight of numbers, the best tactic is to side step the issue. If your argument was to be successful then an WP:ADF would need to be raised, and the chances are at the moment that you would not gain 75% consensus for deletion. But if a change of name could accomplish the same thing, then problem solved! But "while it would have to be re-written as a piece on the personal title" may be true, stating the obvious, when there are others who hold contrary views and need to be persuaded that a new name is in everyone's interests, does not help. FYI a nonce in UK slang is a child molester. -- Philip Baird Shearer 16:46, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
That was not my comment. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 13:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
There is no point being a Dylan fan if you insist on putting others down to make Dylan seem worthier. He wouldn't like it, y'know... -- andreasegde 18:03, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
I agree that these pages look obviously "owned" by single-purpose POV editing accounts like User:Abuse truth (the username doesn't even try to hide it), but unfortunately I don't really have the time/energy to fight with them at the moment. Hopefully someone will, and thanks for pointing it out. -- Delirium 18:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
To tell you the truth, I'm actually kind of sad that you didn't quote me in your recent critique of SqueakBox's editing behavior on the Talk Page for the Adult-child sex article. Still, kudos for stepping up to point out some of the follies in this editor's editing practices. However, that Talk Page may not be the best place for this critique - you may want to move this particular discussion SqueakBox and you are having to a User Talk Page, either his or yours. ~ Homologeo 07:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Please do not make personal attacks, including comments like this. [1] Personal attacks are disruptive, and may result in your editing privileges being blocked. In the future, it's best to avoid commenting on editors. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 08:50, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Please see this ANI thread. — xDanielx T/ C 11:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Copied from the thread there:
Hi Tlatosmd. Unfortunately I think I must bow out; too disillusioned by my Wikipedia experience. I had hoped that I could make some useful contribution, but realize now that I was being naïve. I can spend countless hours (and I know that you have spent even more) attempting to bring some valuable material to the pages, but then Squeakbox, Pol64 and Photouploaded drop by, and in just a couple of minutes, they insult editors, revert the work they have done, and refuse to provide sources for their assertions (although, of course, they don't need to verify, because they are speaking "the truth"). Wikipedia does nothing to prevent this; I guess it will achieve the quality of output it deserves.
Anyway, just wanted to say thanks for your contributions, from which I have been learning a great deal - your depth of knowledge on the subject is vast, and incredibly inspiring. I am now looking forward to following up on many of the references you have mentioned - in the relative peace of my own quiet research! Under different circumstances...
My best wishes, Strichmann ( talk) 07:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to urge you not to feed the troll on the PPA talkpage. That rarely helps, and I don't see much good coming from that discussion. Martijn Hoekstra 16:27, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
You have a great work going at User:Tlatosmd/Adult-child sex. Would you take a look at this version of the article Adult-child sex? The version has been gradually chopped of to nothingness eventually. May be you would also like to have all the material and references of that version incorporated into your workpage version. BTW, will be it be alright if an outsider wants to collaborate? At least on the talk page of the workpage? I may be interested to volunteer. Cheers. Aditya( talk • contribs) 16:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I've replied to your question about moral turpitude on the article talk page. I'll go back and try to add some comments about the rating. Aleta (Sing) 02:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I've commented briefly on the mythology comments page, and slightly less briefly on the LGBT peer review page. Aleta (Sing) 03:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that, due to rising tensions surrounding the ACS article and its current AfD, and because of disregard for proper Wikipedia procedure and policies by a number of regular editors and admins, you have decided to withdraw either permanently or temporarily from editing associated with this article. VigilancePrime and Pairadox have chosen to take a similar course of action. This saddens me, because contributions by upstanding Wikipedians such as yourselves are very helpful in the improvement process of controversial articles such as this. Your assistance will be greatly missed, if you choose to leave or hold back on editing the ACS article. Considering prior repeated attempts by select editors to ignore and violate Wikipedia policies and to do whatever is possible to destroy this piece, your civil, well-balanced, and rational editing will definitely be needed, no matter the outcome of the AfD. Although I realize that it is difficult to contribute when so many violations and incivilities are taking place, I urge you to return to this article as soon as you can. I will personally be happy to see you return, and I'm sure the article will be the better for it as well. Best regards, ~ Homologeo ( talk) 04:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
User:Tlatosmd/Adult-child sex, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tlatosmd/Adult-child sex and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Tlatosmd/Adult-child sex during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy ( Help!) 22:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
You, as an admitted doppelganger of User:TlatoSMD, who is indef blocked, are also indef blocked. See the other account's talk page for more info. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC)