|
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For the great work done at the Isiah Thomas article, I, Brewcrewer, award you with this star. brew crewer (yada, yada) 07:00, 24 April 2008 (UTC) |
You need to read the WP:BLP guidelines. And information that could be seen as libellous needs a source. You have now added sources, so there is no problem but the onus is always on you to add sources to text, not for me to refrain from removing it. Also bear in mind that Wikipedia is not censored, those little "expletive deleted" boxes can go, this is not the Nixon tapes. And finally I would be careful of WP:OWN, I see you have a barnstar for your work on that one article, don't let that make you think that you are the olny editor who is allowed to edit that article. I have no interest in Isiah Thomas, I just went past the article and saw some remarks which stood out as possibly in violation of our policies, so I took them out, as I would do on any article. Remember that when editing an article it is important that the information is backed up otherwise it may go, the quote you have on the page about "I am innocent" has no source, if I were you I would find one or another editor may remove it. Darrenhusted ( talk) 08:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Per WP:CRYSTAL, we only change an athlete's team details based on an official signing; not a deal agreed in principle. Thanks. -- Madchester ( talk) 03:46, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
New York Yankees, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The material you removed appears to have been sourced, and you did not provide any explanation for the change in your edit summary.
Bdb484 (
talk)
02:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
New York Yankees. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Bdb484 (
talk)
02:18, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Okay. Bmg916 Speak 03:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that with these two edits: [1] and [2] you removed facts regarding the DHL awards. Since you didn't include an edit summary, I am not sure why you did this. Care to share? Atlantabravz ( talk) 11:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
I contend that the DHL Award is notable. See here: DHL Delivery Man of the Year Award. Considering the fact that he broke the all-time saves record and still didn't win seems to be worth mentioning. MLB has also sanctioned that award just as they do the Rolaids Relief Man Award. Atlantabravz ( talk) 23:00, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry, you're simply wrong. You are removing a well-referenced statement from the expert in the field. Yes, it is an opinion, but referenced expert opinions are perfectly allowable. Staxringold talk contribs 01:35, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
2009 World Series has been reverted, as it introduced
negative or controversial biographical material without providing a
reliable source for this information. Wikipedia requires that all such material be
sourced to address the issue of
libel. Thank you.
elektrik
SHOOS
19:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
21:07, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Must have been a glitch, sorry. elektrik SHOOS 03:59, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
|
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For the great work done at the Isiah Thomas article, I, Brewcrewer, award you with this star. brew crewer (yada, yada) 07:00, 24 April 2008 (UTC) |
You need to read the WP:BLP guidelines. And information that could be seen as libellous needs a source. You have now added sources, so there is no problem but the onus is always on you to add sources to text, not for me to refrain from removing it. Also bear in mind that Wikipedia is not censored, those little "expletive deleted" boxes can go, this is not the Nixon tapes. And finally I would be careful of WP:OWN, I see you have a barnstar for your work on that one article, don't let that make you think that you are the olny editor who is allowed to edit that article. I have no interest in Isiah Thomas, I just went past the article and saw some remarks which stood out as possibly in violation of our policies, so I took them out, as I would do on any article. Remember that when editing an article it is important that the information is backed up otherwise it may go, the quote you have on the page about "I am innocent" has no source, if I were you I would find one or another editor may remove it. Darrenhusted ( talk) 08:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Per WP:CRYSTAL, we only change an athlete's team details based on an official signing; not a deal agreed in principle. Thanks. -- Madchester ( talk) 03:46, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
New York Yankees, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The material you removed appears to have been sourced, and you did not provide any explanation for the change in your edit summary.
Bdb484 (
talk)
02:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
New York Yankees. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Bdb484 (
talk)
02:18, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Okay. Bmg916 Speak 03:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that with these two edits: [1] and [2] you removed facts regarding the DHL awards. Since you didn't include an edit summary, I am not sure why you did this. Care to share? Atlantabravz ( talk) 11:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
I contend that the DHL Award is notable. See here: DHL Delivery Man of the Year Award. Considering the fact that he broke the all-time saves record and still didn't win seems to be worth mentioning. MLB has also sanctioned that award just as they do the Rolaids Relief Man Award. Atlantabravz ( talk) 23:00, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry, you're simply wrong. You are removing a well-referenced statement from the expert in the field. Yes, it is an opinion, but referenced expert opinions are perfectly allowable. Staxringold talk contribs 01:35, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
2009 World Series has been reverted, as it introduced
negative or controversial biographical material without providing a
reliable source for this information. Wikipedia requires that all such material be
sourced to address the issue of
libel. Thank you.
elektrik
SHOOS
19:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
21:07, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Must have been a glitch, sorry. elektrik SHOOS 03:59, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)