This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 50 | ← | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 | Archive 56 | Archive 57 | → | Archive 60 |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:07, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello Titodutta. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.
The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.
If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)
If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.
Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.
I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).
Sent via-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Sir, i am confused, please see through it once again i am seeking your guidance on this hoax per them. Have a good day. Regards. доктор прагматик 11:04, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello! This is a reminder about your participation at WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2014. Please manually update your assessment score from 14 November 2014 here. Thanks and happy assessing! - Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 15:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
I have requested Wikimedia India for a very small grant to buy a scanner and a book. Please see my application here.
If you think I deserve this grant, please give me some endorsements. You don't need to edit that Wikimedia India page (moreover they have disabled sign up now)
All they need is some evidence that I am at least a newbie/beginner editor here on En WP. --
Tito☸
Dutta
11:48, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Please endorse below. I'll link this thread directly there.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:21, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
I am unable to view the sixth page containing search results. There's no option to view the 6th page at the end of search results. Even if I force the tool to view the search results ( example), it shows none of them. I'm using this tool as an alternative to Google Search. Thanks.-- Skr15081997 ( talk) 14:04, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:The Invention of Art A Cultural History front cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:19, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Just a gentle reminder that you signed up for the drive but your assessments are yet to begin. If the Tag & Assess script doesn't work, let us all assess manually. Even 5 assessments each day by each editor will help us reduce the backlog quite fast. AshLin ( talk) 07:59, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Wish you speedy racovery and be active as usual. Some time back I got my post removed and Iwas reprimanded. Now I want you advice as to how my views expressed in my blog Www.philosophyofkural.blogspot.in can be included in the wiki.It has a good bibliographical reference. It was accepted for presentation in SACP2014 coference held last june in SUNY, NY. As you are indisposed, I wait and reply and help me out at your convenience. H.V.VISWESWARAN pushpavichu@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.202.93.98 ( talk) 16:33, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Let's begin our India related plans and programming discussion :-) AbhiSuryawanshi ( talk)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 50 | ← | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 | Archive 56 | Archive 57 | → | Archive 60 |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:07, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello Titodutta. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.
The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.
If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)
If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.
Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.
I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).
Sent via-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Sir, i am confused, please see through it once again i am seeking your guidance on this hoax per them. Have a good day. Regards. доктор прагматик 11:04, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello! This is a reminder about your participation at WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2014. Please manually update your assessment score from 14 November 2014 here. Thanks and happy assessing! - Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 15:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
I have requested Wikimedia India for a very small grant to buy a scanner and a book. Please see my application here.
If you think I deserve this grant, please give me some endorsements. You don't need to edit that Wikimedia India page (moreover they have disabled sign up now)
All they need is some evidence that I am at least a newbie/beginner editor here on En WP. --
Tito☸
Dutta
11:48, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Please endorse below. I'll link this thread directly there.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:21, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
I am unable to view the sixth page containing search results. There's no option to view the 6th page at the end of search results. Even if I force the tool to view the search results ( example), it shows none of them. I'm using this tool as an alternative to Google Search. Thanks.-- Skr15081997 ( talk) 14:04, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:The Invention of Art A Cultural History front cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:19, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Just a gentle reminder that you signed up for the drive but your assessments are yet to begin. If the Tag & Assess script doesn't work, let us all assess manually. Even 5 assessments each day by each editor will help us reduce the backlog quite fast. AshLin ( talk) 07:59, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Wish you speedy racovery and be active as usual. Some time back I got my post removed and Iwas reprimanded. Now I want you advice as to how my views expressed in my blog Www.philosophyofkural.blogspot.in can be included in the wiki.It has a good bibliographical reference. It was accepted for presentation in SACP2014 coference held last june in SUNY, NY. As you are indisposed, I wait and reply and help me out at your convenience. H.V.VISWESWARAN pushpavichu@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.202.93.98 ( talk) 16:33, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Let's begin our India related plans and programming discussion :-) AbhiSuryawanshi ( talk)