sama ala e Klingon toki, e toki pona tawa pali. ken ala weka tawa e kulupu pilin sama. pona.
Unlike Klingon, toki pona links have not been disabled. Please stop removing these before there is consensus to do so. Thank you. Angela . 00:37, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I don't know if I'm missing something but, Age limit redirected to Senescence? Kind of a longshot... Ilyanep 16:29, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I don't see why you reduced the size of the image so that the dragon is barely distinguishable, and created all that white space. Why should a "thumbnail' be literally the size of a thumbnail? I haven't touched your edit. But i hope you'll have a look at the page as you've left it. Wetman 01:22, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
You say Now I'm advocating the idea of replacing the navigational elements with categories, but apparently some people want to keep my original idea. I'm one of the people who'd like to keep them :)
I was a little sad that you removed {{Table_Unicode}} from Han unification (and presumably others as well, but that's a page I was watching). I feel that these navigational elements present a more structured approach to Categories; the two can be complementary, but I do not think that Categories should replace navigational elements.
See, for example, the "Politics of Germany" sidebar (e.g. here); it organises related things together, whereas categories only group alphabetically, unless you break things down into lots of subcategories—in which case it becomes hard to see the bigger picture. -- pne 15:55, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Do you mind not going and vfding other peoples articles. I saw you added a vfd to Katalyst, but it seems you know nothing about him. I didn't write that article, but I know that there is such a person. - JiangFlungDung 02:02, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I am sure you have a reason for your change of the looks of the disambiguation block at Republic of Karelia, I'm just curious about how you think. -- Ruhrjung 12:47, 2004 Jun 16 (UTC)
Why moving "Be (cyrillic)" to "Be (Cyrillic)"? Nikola 05:37, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you were one of the most active posters at the moment, and you are an administrator, so maybe you could help me with a problem I'm having. User:Colinrorr keeps removing the vfd notice I've put on his page on Danny Rosenblatt, a non-notable high school student. Can you chip in to the discussion and tell him to stop removing the notice? TheCustomOfLife 22:47, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
What happened to the history of David Lovering? While checking Recent Changes I came across an anon whose edit summary was "added external links". Checking the edit history showed his edit was the only one (i.e. article creation). I bulleted the links and lowercased the "L" in links but that doesn't show in the history. Recent Changes shows my edit, your edit 48 seconds later, and two edits by the anon several minutes before our edits. The article history only shows one edit by the anon and then your edit. Any idea what's going on? SWAdair | Talk 08:50, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Not true. See: WP:VIP#65.64.92.200_.28and_others.29. Also see history of that page. User has repeatedly added false information over and over again from different IPs. RADICALBENDER ★ 13:33, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Hi Tim,
in der de:wp zeichnet sich ab, dass im Rahmen der Qualitätsoffensive als nächstes die Gemeinden in Deutschland drankommen. Eigentlich der richtige Zeitpunkt, auf ein zentrales Template für die Infobox umzusatteln.
Ich hab ein wenig damit gespielt und bin auf ein paar Bugs gestoßen, auf die so recht niemand eine Antwort weiß.
Die Diskussionen unter den Entwicklern verfolge ich praktisch nicht. Daher habe ich auch keinen Plan, wer nun bei was helfen kann. Aber vielleicht hast Du eine Idee, wie man das fixen kann. Danke -- Ralf
I remember you sort of invited me to Wikipedia several months ago, but I was busy with other things, so I never even took a look at it... But two days ago, on the weekend, I decided to check it out, and I was pleasantly surprised! What a great way of writing an encyclopedia. Now I am eager to contribute, but I am not sure yet where I should start beside from obvious places like Belarus and Belarusian language... ;) — Rydel
Please don't delete the text in Template:Cleanup. We most definitely DO need it so that people can see that the article they come to is in need of Cleanup. The category at the top of the page is easy to miss. Rick K 20:05, Jul 11, 2004 (UTC)
sorry but he first called me an idiot+ it`s not his first time to call people like that!
check this out :
plus:
then we can talk. [[User:Avala| Avala| ★]] 12:33, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
why did you get into this? i don`t know but it was you decission. You said i was attacking him and now try to explain howcome such a good guy like adam became "technical caller". And howcome any who thinks differnetly than him is an idiot?
[[User:Avala| Avala| ★]] 13:49, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I saw in the delete log that you'd removed image:portugal stadiums small.png without discussion. I think removing images like this without any sort of discussion Not Cool. The small image is 1/3 the size (being 256 colour) and more legible (having being sharpened). Ed g2s 15:49, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
You are of course correct on center and i vs. CSS. Do you know where the CSS for classic lives? - David Gerard 15:42, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I just wanted to say that.
And I'm probably going to have to jack some of your layout to make mine sexy.
Maybe. The Inedible Bulk 03:26, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Do not revert my changes to the Netscape Navigator article without first viewing the article's Talk page. -- Mr. Grinch 15:09, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Glad you liked my changes to the Vulcan page. I have more things in mind, but I don't know when I'll get the chance; mostly about the Stone of Gol, Rumarie, and IDIC. Trying to think of notable Vulcan stuff after 2161 too.
I've helped flesh out the entries for the Romulans, Tholians, Klingons, Ferengi, and Andorians, and I think the Vulcan page should be done justice, considering how prominent they are. -- StAkAr Karnak 01:33, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
This user [1] seems to have made a number of iffy contributions of suspicious-sounding academic institutions. You might want to take a look. -- The Anome 15:43, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Hello. I've directed some of the links to the redirect page function domain to domain (mathematics). If you go to the latter and click on "what links here", you'll see that more work is needed. I'll keep at it, but it will take a while. Can you help (since you moved the page to its latest name)? Michael Hardy 17:11, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Hi Timwi,
yesterday i added a comment to the page meta:Talk:Experimental new database schema without having a look to the history. Today i saw that the page is that old that no one will have it in his watchlist. Can you please have a look at it and give me comment? Thanks Mijobe 10:21, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
sama ala e Klingon toki, e toki pona tawa pali. ken ala weka tawa e kulupu pilin sama. pona.
Unlike Klingon, toki pona links have not been disabled. Please stop removing these before there is consensus to do so. Thank you. Angela . 00:37, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I don't know if I'm missing something but, Age limit redirected to Senescence? Kind of a longshot... Ilyanep 16:29, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I don't see why you reduced the size of the image so that the dragon is barely distinguishable, and created all that white space. Why should a "thumbnail' be literally the size of a thumbnail? I haven't touched your edit. But i hope you'll have a look at the page as you've left it. Wetman 01:22, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
You say Now I'm advocating the idea of replacing the navigational elements with categories, but apparently some people want to keep my original idea. I'm one of the people who'd like to keep them :)
I was a little sad that you removed {{Table_Unicode}} from Han unification (and presumably others as well, but that's a page I was watching). I feel that these navigational elements present a more structured approach to Categories; the two can be complementary, but I do not think that Categories should replace navigational elements.
See, for example, the "Politics of Germany" sidebar (e.g. here); it organises related things together, whereas categories only group alphabetically, unless you break things down into lots of subcategories—in which case it becomes hard to see the bigger picture. -- pne 15:55, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Do you mind not going and vfding other peoples articles. I saw you added a vfd to Katalyst, but it seems you know nothing about him. I didn't write that article, but I know that there is such a person. - JiangFlungDung 02:02, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I am sure you have a reason for your change of the looks of the disambiguation block at Republic of Karelia, I'm just curious about how you think. -- Ruhrjung 12:47, 2004 Jun 16 (UTC)
Why moving "Be (cyrillic)" to "Be (Cyrillic)"? Nikola 05:37, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you were one of the most active posters at the moment, and you are an administrator, so maybe you could help me with a problem I'm having. User:Colinrorr keeps removing the vfd notice I've put on his page on Danny Rosenblatt, a non-notable high school student. Can you chip in to the discussion and tell him to stop removing the notice? TheCustomOfLife 22:47, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
What happened to the history of David Lovering? While checking Recent Changes I came across an anon whose edit summary was "added external links". Checking the edit history showed his edit was the only one (i.e. article creation). I bulleted the links and lowercased the "L" in links but that doesn't show in the history. Recent Changes shows my edit, your edit 48 seconds later, and two edits by the anon several minutes before our edits. The article history only shows one edit by the anon and then your edit. Any idea what's going on? SWAdair | Talk 08:50, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Not true. See: WP:VIP#65.64.92.200_.28and_others.29. Also see history of that page. User has repeatedly added false information over and over again from different IPs. RADICALBENDER ★ 13:33, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Hi Tim,
in der de:wp zeichnet sich ab, dass im Rahmen der Qualitätsoffensive als nächstes die Gemeinden in Deutschland drankommen. Eigentlich der richtige Zeitpunkt, auf ein zentrales Template für die Infobox umzusatteln.
Ich hab ein wenig damit gespielt und bin auf ein paar Bugs gestoßen, auf die so recht niemand eine Antwort weiß.
Die Diskussionen unter den Entwicklern verfolge ich praktisch nicht. Daher habe ich auch keinen Plan, wer nun bei was helfen kann. Aber vielleicht hast Du eine Idee, wie man das fixen kann. Danke -- Ralf
I remember you sort of invited me to Wikipedia several months ago, but I was busy with other things, so I never even took a look at it... But two days ago, on the weekend, I decided to check it out, and I was pleasantly surprised! What a great way of writing an encyclopedia. Now I am eager to contribute, but I am not sure yet where I should start beside from obvious places like Belarus and Belarusian language... ;) — Rydel
Please don't delete the text in Template:Cleanup. We most definitely DO need it so that people can see that the article they come to is in need of Cleanup. The category at the top of the page is easy to miss. Rick K 20:05, Jul 11, 2004 (UTC)
sorry but he first called me an idiot+ it`s not his first time to call people like that!
check this out :
plus:
then we can talk. [[User:Avala| Avala| ★]] 12:33, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
why did you get into this? i don`t know but it was you decission. You said i was attacking him and now try to explain howcome such a good guy like adam became "technical caller". And howcome any who thinks differnetly than him is an idiot?
[[User:Avala| Avala| ★]] 13:49, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I saw in the delete log that you'd removed image:portugal stadiums small.png without discussion. I think removing images like this without any sort of discussion Not Cool. The small image is 1/3 the size (being 256 colour) and more legible (having being sharpened). Ed g2s 15:49, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
You are of course correct on center and i vs. CSS. Do you know where the CSS for classic lives? - David Gerard 15:42, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I just wanted to say that.
And I'm probably going to have to jack some of your layout to make mine sexy.
Maybe. The Inedible Bulk 03:26, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Do not revert my changes to the Netscape Navigator article without first viewing the article's Talk page. -- Mr. Grinch 15:09, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Glad you liked my changes to the Vulcan page. I have more things in mind, but I don't know when I'll get the chance; mostly about the Stone of Gol, Rumarie, and IDIC. Trying to think of notable Vulcan stuff after 2161 too.
I've helped flesh out the entries for the Romulans, Tholians, Klingons, Ferengi, and Andorians, and I think the Vulcan page should be done justice, considering how prominent they are. -- StAkAr Karnak 01:33, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
This user [1] seems to have made a number of iffy contributions of suspicious-sounding academic institutions. You might want to take a look. -- The Anome 15:43, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Hello. I've directed some of the links to the redirect page function domain to domain (mathematics). If you go to the latter and click on "what links here", you'll see that more work is needed. I'll keep at it, but it will take a while. Can you help (since you moved the page to its latest name)? Michael Hardy 17:11, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Hi Timwi,
yesterday i added a comment to the page meta:Talk:Experimental new database schema without having a look to the history. Today i saw that the page is that old that no one will have it in his watchlist. Can you please have a look at it and give me comment? Thanks Mijobe 10:21, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)