![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | → | Archive 20 |
You know that edits such as this or this or this are frowned on for use with AWB - see Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser#Rules of use #4. It's creating a lot of pretty useless edits on my watchlist and making it difficult to see what exactly is being done with other articles. Can you kindly stop performing such edits? Ealdgyth - Talk 15:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Can you look at this? I think the open nomination can be closed as a keep. It was my nomination to do something. The introduction has been rewritten. Vegaswikian ( talk) 00:57, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
maxarchivesize = 32K? How about something in the range of 300-500K? Your setting is just too small. BTW, I do mine by year. Seems to work well. Vegaswikian ( talk) 01:01, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
A CfD which you have been previously involved in has been proposed again at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_January_12#Category:National_Public_Radio. You are invited to participate in the current discussion. Frank | talk 01:27, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Tim. It would perhaps be best to salt the simple-X categories. A few hours after you removed Ebe123 from the simple-3 category [1], he added himself to the simple-4 category [2]. Of course Babel AutoCreate then created Category:User simple-4. Gotta love the stubborn persistence of bots. :-) Pichpich ( talk) 21:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Tim; edits
like this technically fall foul of
WP:AWB#Rules of use no. 4, because {{
commonscat}}
is merely a redirect to {{
commons category}}
, and nothing else is being altered (see also
WP:NOTBROKEN). --
Redrose64 (
talk)
13:02, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Category:People educated at Ysgol Uwchradd Bodedern, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. AussieLegend ( talk) 15:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi
I think you are a little off on that edit summary. Old Hulmeians is a name used by alumni of Oldham Hulme (yes, we used to call it that as well). I realise that you may be surprised to find it true, yet it is so :¬) Technically we are supposed to call ourselves Oldham Hulmeians, but that is often not the case. Chaosdruid ( talk) 05:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your good work on Hancock Station and Round Top Station. -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 14:58, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
I missed nominating Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Mercyhurst College in the CFD for a change to Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Mercyhurst University. Can you please get Cydebot to make those changes, too?-- GrapedApe ( talk) 15:10, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
You closed this CfD recently. On mature reflection, I think that it should have been re-named to "Category:Roman Catholic Church sexual abuse scandal in Ireland". (i.e. sexual, not sex). Laurel Lodged ( talk) 21:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
AWB (and other automated tools) should not be used for making such "important" changes as this one. There is a specific rule about this. Debresser ( talk) 23:27, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
About a month ago you deleted Category:Indexes of articles. I recreated it as a soft redirect because I found a broken link at Category:Contents, which I fixed by linking the new Index of topics cat. By recreating the cat, I was able to check the What links here list for other possible broken links. I fixed links in the the following cats:
You might want to check the What links here list one more time before you re-delete. I think I got the important ones. – PIE ( CLIMAX ) 10:22, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm disappointed (but hardly surprised) to see that "no consensus" means that the ill-considered speedy rename gets kept... -- Orlady ( talk) 21:51, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Tim! I want to bring a minor issue to your attention. Category:Australian Open (tennis) champions was on my watchlist and, after it was renamed, I noticed that Cydebot deleted it with an incorrect deletion summary. I checked the page history of the CFD working page and found that it was a consequence of this edit.
When an empty category that has been merged or renamed is listed in the 'Empty then delete' section, Cydebot often deletes it without specifying the new name (e.g. here) or, as in this case, with a link to a non-existent discussion, making it more difficult to track the history of a category. In general, merged and renamed categories are best left in the 'Speedy moves' or 'Move/merge then delete' section until they are deleted by Cydebot or manually using a more complete deletion summary.
There used to be a 'Ready for deletion' section, too, but it was removed in 2009 (mainly because CFD/W had become an admin-only page, but I think partly also due to this issue). Best, -- Black Falcon ( talk) 18:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for closing the Cfd on Category:Cache (computing). No consensus for the gerund, and consensus for the disambiguator, but it should be plural. I posted a speedy request per C2A but thought I'd let you know in case you object. – Pnm ( talk) 01:21, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
This category has now been listified. What needs to be done to delete the category? John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm considering a DRV (or perhaps merely a renom) of these. To clarify, would you please explain how you came to your conclusion about consensus on these? - jc37 22:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, there! I just wanted to give you a heads-up on an odd/annoying feature of userboxes: some of them include category links within the actual text of the userbox (I have no idea why, and I've asked at Wikipedia talk:Userboxes) and when a category is renamed the link should, ideally, be updated too (or removed). See here for an example. Best, -- Black Falcon ( talk) 19:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Just FYI, I'm nominating User:Fayenatic london for adminship. Your opinion on the subject would be welcome. If you wish to co-nominate, you can do so as well. Or just comment as desired.-- Mike Selinker ( talk) 14:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Dear Timrollpickering,
My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and
Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's
Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we
teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community,
and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what
you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community
[[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_82#Learn_to_be_a_Wikipedia_Administrator_-
_New_class_at_MSU|HERE]], where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my
students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training,
motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one
of our students.
So a few things about the interviews:
communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have
been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.
Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak
with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I
will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your
name HERE instead.
If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be
more than happy to speak with you.
Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Obar -- Jaobar ( talk) 07:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Young June Sah -- Yjune.sah ( talk) 21:49, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, you recently did a speedy category move - I've placed a discussion about it in Category_talk:Free_healthcare_software. Could you respond to my question? thanks. -- Karl.brown ( talk) 22:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Tim, could I possibly ask for some assistance with
this lady?
I supplied a Electoral Reform Society reference to the swing in her constituency but some code on the .pdf page seems to screw up the template.
I know I'm being cheeky but is there any chance you could look at it?
JRPG (
talk)
23:40, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Category:Old Royals, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 15:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Two new cfds propose the renaming of some twenty categories. Most of those who took part in last year's cfd " Former pupils by school in the United Kingdom" seem unaware of them, so I am notifying all those who took part in that discussion, to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus. Please consider contributing here and here. Moonraker ( talk) 12:57, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
I have identified List of place names in the United States of Spanish orgin as connecting to an actual list. There was no reason to undo my blanking, the list actually exists. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for adding the new article I created, Sian Breckin, to Category:People educated at Roundhay School. Much appreciated! Cheers, — Cirt ( talk) 04:23, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Kent Students' Union until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies ( talk) 22:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Category:Former pupils by school in Guernsey, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker ( talk) 11:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Category:Former pupils by school in Jersey, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker ( talk) 11:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Category:Former pupils by school in Jamaica, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker ( talk) 11:07, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, when making edits like this and the previous one to the same page, please link to the actual CFD discussion where it was agreed, rather than to the generic WP:CFD page which has nothing at all concerning either Category:LGBT journalists or Category:LGBT broadcasters. Without such a link these could both be reverted per WP:DIFFUSE. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 19:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
I've moved all the companies, brands, and businesspeople who were not also themselves "at the bench" from the category. Thanks for your help. -- Orange Mike | Talk 16:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
You may want to consider using Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Large when there are large listings, either based on the article count or a large number or related categories. Doing this does not backup the activity on the small bot tasks. Vegaswikian ( talk) 00:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Okay there's a handful of anime categories still to be renamed that weren't included in the first lot. I've currently got these parked at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Large but Cydebot doesn't seem to be registering them at all despite going for periods without anything to process on the main page. At the moment the best I can do is to put them on the main page one by one but the remaining ones will take a long time and at some point someone else is going to stick the lot up in one go. Is the Large page actually functioning properly? If not this is an even bigger problem. Timrollpickering ( talk) 00:48, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Just to make sure those interested in particular discussions are made aware of them, please try to notify at least the project about particular discussions. The only way I found out about them was when my watchlist was suddenly flooded by Cydebot renaming categories I was watching (since I created them in the first place). This will help to avoid any possible concerns from the project. Thanks!
···
日本穣
? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe ·
Join WP Japan!
08:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Archaeology artifacts of China for a full discussion here. Since you opposed the original nomination for speedy renaming, I thought you might be interested. Cheers! -- Black Falcon ( talk) 23:26, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
"Timrollpicerking": I don't know all of the rules, and don't know why that guy closed the discussion. Please re-open it.-- RichardMcCoy ( talk) 17:46, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. What a mess, waist of time and what a joke this whole process has been. -- RichardMcCoy ( talk) 17:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Not sure how you chose which ones had no consensus (though I honestly don't strongly care whether they stay or go) but as two of us noted clowns, I wanted to note that 2 of us noted postal workers as well. - jc37 06:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | → | Archive 20 |
You know that edits such as this or this or this are frowned on for use with AWB - see Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser#Rules of use #4. It's creating a lot of pretty useless edits on my watchlist and making it difficult to see what exactly is being done with other articles. Can you kindly stop performing such edits? Ealdgyth - Talk 15:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Can you look at this? I think the open nomination can be closed as a keep. It was my nomination to do something. The introduction has been rewritten. Vegaswikian ( talk) 00:57, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
maxarchivesize = 32K? How about something in the range of 300-500K? Your setting is just too small. BTW, I do mine by year. Seems to work well. Vegaswikian ( talk) 01:01, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
A CfD which you have been previously involved in has been proposed again at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_January_12#Category:National_Public_Radio. You are invited to participate in the current discussion. Frank | talk 01:27, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Tim. It would perhaps be best to salt the simple-X categories. A few hours after you removed Ebe123 from the simple-3 category [1], he added himself to the simple-4 category [2]. Of course Babel AutoCreate then created Category:User simple-4. Gotta love the stubborn persistence of bots. :-) Pichpich ( talk) 21:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Tim; edits
like this technically fall foul of
WP:AWB#Rules of use no. 4, because {{
commonscat}}
is merely a redirect to {{
commons category}}
, and nothing else is being altered (see also
WP:NOTBROKEN). --
Redrose64 (
talk)
13:02, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Category:People educated at Ysgol Uwchradd Bodedern, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. AussieLegend ( talk) 15:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi
I think you are a little off on that edit summary. Old Hulmeians is a name used by alumni of Oldham Hulme (yes, we used to call it that as well). I realise that you may be surprised to find it true, yet it is so :¬) Technically we are supposed to call ourselves Oldham Hulmeians, but that is often not the case. Chaosdruid ( talk) 05:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your good work on Hancock Station and Round Top Station. -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 14:58, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
I missed nominating Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Mercyhurst College in the CFD for a change to Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Mercyhurst University. Can you please get Cydebot to make those changes, too?-- GrapedApe ( talk) 15:10, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
You closed this CfD recently. On mature reflection, I think that it should have been re-named to "Category:Roman Catholic Church sexual abuse scandal in Ireland". (i.e. sexual, not sex). Laurel Lodged ( talk) 21:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
AWB (and other automated tools) should not be used for making such "important" changes as this one. There is a specific rule about this. Debresser ( talk) 23:27, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
About a month ago you deleted Category:Indexes of articles. I recreated it as a soft redirect because I found a broken link at Category:Contents, which I fixed by linking the new Index of topics cat. By recreating the cat, I was able to check the What links here list for other possible broken links. I fixed links in the the following cats:
You might want to check the What links here list one more time before you re-delete. I think I got the important ones. – PIE ( CLIMAX ) 10:22, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm disappointed (but hardly surprised) to see that "no consensus" means that the ill-considered speedy rename gets kept... -- Orlady ( talk) 21:51, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Tim! I want to bring a minor issue to your attention. Category:Australian Open (tennis) champions was on my watchlist and, after it was renamed, I noticed that Cydebot deleted it with an incorrect deletion summary. I checked the page history of the CFD working page and found that it was a consequence of this edit.
When an empty category that has been merged or renamed is listed in the 'Empty then delete' section, Cydebot often deletes it without specifying the new name (e.g. here) or, as in this case, with a link to a non-existent discussion, making it more difficult to track the history of a category. In general, merged and renamed categories are best left in the 'Speedy moves' or 'Move/merge then delete' section until they are deleted by Cydebot or manually using a more complete deletion summary.
There used to be a 'Ready for deletion' section, too, but it was removed in 2009 (mainly because CFD/W had become an admin-only page, but I think partly also due to this issue). Best, -- Black Falcon ( talk) 18:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for closing the Cfd on Category:Cache (computing). No consensus for the gerund, and consensus for the disambiguator, but it should be plural. I posted a speedy request per C2A but thought I'd let you know in case you object. – Pnm ( talk) 01:21, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
This category has now been listified. What needs to be done to delete the category? John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm considering a DRV (or perhaps merely a renom) of these. To clarify, would you please explain how you came to your conclusion about consensus on these? - jc37 22:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, there! I just wanted to give you a heads-up on an odd/annoying feature of userboxes: some of them include category links within the actual text of the userbox (I have no idea why, and I've asked at Wikipedia talk:Userboxes) and when a category is renamed the link should, ideally, be updated too (or removed). See here for an example. Best, -- Black Falcon ( talk) 19:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Just FYI, I'm nominating User:Fayenatic london for adminship. Your opinion on the subject would be welcome. If you wish to co-nominate, you can do so as well. Or just comment as desired.-- Mike Selinker ( talk) 14:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Dear Timrollpickering,
My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and
Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's
Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we
teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community,
and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what
you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community
[[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_82#Learn_to_be_a_Wikipedia_Administrator_-
_New_class_at_MSU|HERE]], where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my
students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training,
motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one
of our students.
So a few things about the interviews:
communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have
been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.
Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak
with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I
will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your
name HERE instead.
If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be
more than happy to speak with you.
Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Obar -- Jaobar ( talk) 07:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Young June Sah -- Yjune.sah ( talk) 21:49, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, you recently did a speedy category move - I've placed a discussion about it in Category_talk:Free_healthcare_software. Could you respond to my question? thanks. -- Karl.brown ( talk) 22:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Tim, could I possibly ask for some assistance with
this lady?
I supplied a Electoral Reform Society reference to the swing in her constituency but some code on the .pdf page seems to screw up the template.
I know I'm being cheeky but is there any chance you could look at it?
JRPG (
talk)
23:40, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Category:Old Royals, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 15:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Two new cfds propose the renaming of some twenty categories. Most of those who took part in last year's cfd " Former pupils by school in the United Kingdom" seem unaware of them, so I am notifying all those who took part in that discussion, to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus. Please consider contributing here and here. Moonraker ( talk) 12:57, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
I have identified List of place names in the United States of Spanish orgin as connecting to an actual list. There was no reason to undo my blanking, the list actually exists. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for adding the new article I created, Sian Breckin, to Category:People educated at Roundhay School. Much appreciated! Cheers, — Cirt ( talk) 04:23, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Kent Students' Union until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies ( talk) 22:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Category:Former pupils by school in Guernsey, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker ( talk) 11:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Category:Former pupils by school in Jersey, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker ( talk) 11:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Category:Former pupils by school in Jamaica, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker ( talk) 11:07, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, when making edits like this and the previous one to the same page, please link to the actual CFD discussion where it was agreed, rather than to the generic WP:CFD page which has nothing at all concerning either Category:LGBT journalists or Category:LGBT broadcasters. Without such a link these could both be reverted per WP:DIFFUSE. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 19:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
I've moved all the companies, brands, and businesspeople who were not also themselves "at the bench" from the category. Thanks for your help. -- Orange Mike | Talk 16:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
You may want to consider using Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Large when there are large listings, either based on the article count or a large number or related categories. Doing this does not backup the activity on the small bot tasks. Vegaswikian ( talk) 00:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Okay there's a handful of anime categories still to be renamed that weren't included in the first lot. I've currently got these parked at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Large but Cydebot doesn't seem to be registering them at all despite going for periods without anything to process on the main page. At the moment the best I can do is to put them on the main page one by one but the remaining ones will take a long time and at some point someone else is going to stick the lot up in one go. Is the Large page actually functioning properly? If not this is an even bigger problem. Timrollpickering ( talk) 00:48, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Just to make sure those interested in particular discussions are made aware of them, please try to notify at least the project about particular discussions. The only way I found out about them was when my watchlist was suddenly flooded by Cydebot renaming categories I was watching (since I created them in the first place). This will help to avoid any possible concerns from the project. Thanks!
···
日本穣
? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe ·
Join WP Japan!
08:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Archaeology artifacts of China for a full discussion here. Since you opposed the original nomination for speedy renaming, I thought you might be interested. Cheers! -- Black Falcon ( talk) 23:26, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
"Timrollpicerking": I don't know all of the rules, and don't know why that guy closed the discussion. Please re-open it.-- RichardMcCoy ( talk) 17:46, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. What a mess, waist of time and what a joke this whole process has been. -- RichardMcCoy ( talk) 17:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Not sure how you chose which ones had no consensus (though I honestly don't strongly care whether they stay or go) but as two of us noted clowns, I wanted to note that 2 of us noted postal workers as well. - jc37 06:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)