|
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created,
Cultureversy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's
guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be
removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the
sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read
Your first article. You may also want to read our
introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.
Brianga (
talk)
02:43, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Palin7monthspregnant.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 20:09, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced
defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to
Sarah Palin, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Kelly
hi!
20:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
They can if the issues are buried by partisans who are trying to protect their chosen candidate. Whether or not this runs in the NYT does not decide whether or not it is legitimate. I am not suggesting that the story is true, but rather that there is a controversy surrounding it. That is indisputable fact. It is a shame that Wikipedia is no longer the peoples' place for all information, but rather an archive for issues already completely fleshed out by the antiquated media outlets. Shame.
Hah! Who called it? The "Palin-faked-her-own-pregnancy-to-cover-for-her-daughter" nonsense has been thoroughly debunked and dealt with accordingly. There's no mention in her article of the "controversy" that you worked so tirelessly to include on Wikipedia. Better luck next time on finding a poorly-sourced, sensationalistic rumor on a political blog that actually holds water. In the meantime, the rest of us will continue to employ the scholarly and intellectual approach to deciding what should and shouldn't be on Wikipedia. Tootles. 68.43.197.22 ( talk) 13:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Image:Palin7monthspregnant.jpg, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Palin7monthspregnant.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Kelly
hi!
20:16, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created,
Cultureversy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's
guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be
removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the
sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read
Your first article. You may also want to read our
introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.
Brianga (
talk)
02:43, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Palin7monthspregnant.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 20:09, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced
defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to
Sarah Palin, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Kelly
hi!
20:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
They can if the issues are buried by partisans who are trying to protect their chosen candidate. Whether or not this runs in the NYT does not decide whether or not it is legitimate. I am not suggesting that the story is true, but rather that there is a controversy surrounding it. That is indisputable fact. It is a shame that Wikipedia is no longer the peoples' place for all information, but rather an archive for issues already completely fleshed out by the antiquated media outlets. Shame.
Hah! Who called it? The "Palin-faked-her-own-pregnancy-to-cover-for-her-daughter" nonsense has been thoroughly debunked and dealt with accordingly. There's no mention in her article of the "controversy" that you worked so tirelessly to include on Wikipedia. Better luck next time on finding a poorly-sourced, sensationalistic rumor on a political blog that actually holds water. In the meantime, the rest of us will continue to employ the scholarly and intellectual approach to deciding what should and shouldn't be on Wikipedia. Tootles. 68.43.197.22 ( talk) 13:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Image:Palin7monthspregnant.jpg, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Palin7monthspregnant.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Kelly
hi!
20:16, 31 August 2008 (UTC)