![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Pretty new here, I just noticed that the vandalism you reverted on Odyssey had an accurate edit summary. Surely the vandal didn’t write it, so I presume you did—how? — Odysseus1479 ( talk) 01:26, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
The only time that you should block a user is if they vandalize after their final warning. Wayne Olajuwon chat 23:33, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
|
The Userpage Shield | |
For reverting vandalism on my user page with jaw-dropping speed, I award you this barnstar. Aaron north ( T/ C) 02:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC) |
Hi, Tide Rolls. I was just making a new article on get.
Oops, almost forgot the tildes. Fwedasd ( talk) 18:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Why do you have to put tildes on your message? Fwedasd ( talk) 18:23, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Where? ;~) LessHeard vanU ( talk) 23:16, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Tide rolls, you won't remember this because it was swamped by the landslide support at your RfA :)
Strong support - Content contribs and edits in other areas are exceptionally low but this candidate is a dedicated janitor. Random stabs at the user's archives show great attention to civility and explanations for edits, and demonstrate a high degree of comprehension of guidelines. Someone I would turn to without hesitation for advice on editing or suggestions for conflict resolution..--Kudpung (tal
The irony is, I really do need your advice now, and thank you for your neutral comment on
User talk :ConcentratedAllPurposeCleanerthis page]] today. I'm not sure if you had already seen
talk:Jeremy Karpen, and this which was posted a few minutes ago
User talk:Jeremykarpen. As I may be throwing my hat in the ring sometime in the forseeable future, I want to be absolutely sure that I have handled this correctly, firmly, and sufficiently politely, and I would certainly value your straightforward advice and suggestions if I have not. Thanks. --
Kudpung (
talk)
02:35, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
For finding a way to beat many people to vandalism including myself on Huggle, here's some stuff:
Wayne Olajuwon has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
![]() |
![]() |
Wayne Olajuwon has given you some
caramel and a
candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun
Halloween treats, and promote
WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween!
If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{ subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message! |
Wayne Olajuwon chat 23:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
The IP's block is up now. So I closed the thread as "good block". If feel there is more to be said please feel free to reopen the discussion. Inka888 Contribs Talk 01:52, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Good call. Drmies ( talk) 04:12, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Tide - the edit on Cat Stevens that you reinstated, adding the section of the immigration law that IP 216.81.81.81 (a domain [1] attached to the Department of Homeland Security, by the way) says is the section under which Stevens was denied entry to the US back in 2004, is clearly OR/synth - the source articles do not say that this was the section under which they were operating, and it is classic OR/synth for the editor to be making a connection that the source did not. I've been trying to explain this on Talk with no success - I feel strongly that this shouldn't be there because, for example, the IP points to a USCIS website where the law is posted, but there is no indication there of, say, when that section was made law, so how would we know that this section number is the one they were enforcing? Only if there was a source that said that this section of immigration law is what was being invoked. We just can't assume it. Even if it is true. That is policy. Am I missing something here? Would appreciate your input. Thanks Tvoz/ talk 07:27, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
After reading the talk page discussions I see your point regarding a direct source. The section recounting Cat Stevens' entry denial is well sourced and I think if the exact statute were notable it would be available from one of these sources. I will watchlist the article and attempt to bring any editors that think the addition is notable to the discussion page. If a consensus can be reached we can then reference that when confronting future attempts. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. See ya 'round Tide rolls 23:29, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
I just wanted to know if it works. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.137.123.57 ( talk) 00:31, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my user page! Antique Rose — Drop me a line 01:15, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Can you block User talk:96.236.39.22 because it's a logged out bot? WAYNE OLAJUWON 00:53, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Why do you keep reverting edits I made on an artical I put up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaysonclinkscal ( talk • contribs) 01:39, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Why did you just write me a message about how to address someone here?? What do you speak for the user...are you like one of them parrots that speak for mutes?? I will be careful in the future and try not to talk like that, but i dont like when people delete something i put when they themselve cant even write to me to tell me my information is false!! MajorHawke ( talk) 00:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
What i am adding is not true?
Blacks win the lowest % of medals at Olympics , less than Asians , blacks underachieve in 95% of sports, so why you can't accept the truth? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.138.183.195 ( talk) 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
I will bring so many facts from soccer , hockey , MMA , Olympic boxing and Estern Europeans dominating boxing from the day the communism collapsed , swimming , gymnastics , triathlon , 95% of sports that we whites dominate that will force you to delete this piece of shit of racism you posted!
I will also bring reliable sources and world records from shot put , hammer , pole vault , cycling , swimming , you name it, trust me , you messed with a nut case here , i will embarrass you and your black superiority theory ;)
I see you reverted the removal of the tag "living person" made by an IP. Please note that Nick Rizzuto is not a living person anymore. You might have been misled by your removal of the addition of copyrighted material before, which was not "dubious" as you described, but rather a copyvio.
Thanks. - CET TALK 02:34, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page, I appreciate it! -- TwistOfCain (talk) 21:33, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Please remove the septina florimonte effect from google search. I am being targeted. Google states you have to remove all the links to wiki. Please delete all articles in wiki about septina florimonte —Preceding unsigned comment added by Septina florimonte ( talk • contribs) 01:20, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Wiki please remove "the septina florimonte effect" from all search engines via wiki .This article was not meant to be published on google for all the world to see.It was posted in error.Please remove all visibility from google search.
Septina florimonte (
talk)
01:24, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
how long does google crawlers take to remove the article"the septina florimonte effect Septina florimonte ( talk) 01:32, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Can they delete article urgently..I am scared..Article was posted in error 01:32, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
This article the septina florimonte effect was osted for all the world to see in error.Please can you remove all links on wiki so septina florimonte can not be traced and send a request to google to remove from web crawler Septina florimonte ( talk) 02:55, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Pretty new here, I just noticed that the vandalism you reverted on Odyssey had an accurate edit summary. Surely the vandal didn’t write it, so I presume you did—how? — Odysseus1479 ( talk) 01:26, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
The only time that you should block a user is if they vandalize after their final warning. Wayne Olajuwon chat 23:33, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
|
The Userpage Shield | |
For reverting vandalism on my user page with jaw-dropping speed, I award you this barnstar. Aaron north ( T/ C) 02:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC) |
Hi, Tide Rolls. I was just making a new article on get.
Oops, almost forgot the tildes. Fwedasd ( talk) 18:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Why do you have to put tildes on your message? Fwedasd ( talk) 18:23, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Where? ;~) LessHeard vanU ( talk) 23:16, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Tide rolls, you won't remember this because it was swamped by the landslide support at your RfA :)
Strong support - Content contribs and edits in other areas are exceptionally low but this candidate is a dedicated janitor. Random stabs at the user's archives show great attention to civility and explanations for edits, and demonstrate a high degree of comprehension of guidelines. Someone I would turn to without hesitation for advice on editing or suggestions for conflict resolution..--Kudpung (tal
The irony is, I really do need your advice now, and thank you for your neutral comment on
User talk :ConcentratedAllPurposeCleanerthis page]] today. I'm not sure if you had already seen
talk:Jeremy Karpen, and this which was posted a few minutes ago
User talk:Jeremykarpen. As I may be throwing my hat in the ring sometime in the forseeable future, I want to be absolutely sure that I have handled this correctly, firmly, and sufficiently politely, and I would certainly value your straightforward advice and suggestions if I have not. Thanks. --
Kudpung (
talk)
02:35, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
For finding a way to beat many people to vandalism including myself on Huggle, here's some stuff:
Wayne Olajuwon has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
![]() |
![]() |
Wayne Olajuwon has given you some
caramel and a
candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun
Halloween treats, and promote
WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween!
If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{ subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message! |
Wayne Olajuwon chat 23:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
The IP's block is up now. So I closed the thread as "good block". If feel there is more to be said please feel free to reopen the discussion. Inka888 Contribs Talk 01:52, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Good call. Drmies ( talk) 04:12, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Tide - the edit on Cat Stevens that you reinstated, adding the section of the immigration law that IP 216.81.81.81 (a domain [1] attached to the Department of Homeland Security, by the way) says is the section under which Stevens was denied entry to the US back in 2004, is clearly OR/synth - the source articles do not say that this was the section under which they were operating, and it is classic OR/synth for the editor to be making a connection that the source did not. I've been trying to explain this on Talk with no success - I feel strongly that this shouldn't be there because, for example, the IP points to a USCIS website where the law is posted, but there is no indication there of, say, when that section was made law, so how would we know that this section number is the one they were enforcing? Only if there was a source that said that this section of immigration law is what was being invoked. We just can't assume it. Even if it is true. That is policy. Am I missing something here? Would appreciate your input. Thanks Tvoz/ talk 07:27, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
After reading the talk page discussions I see your point regarding a direct source. The section recounting Cat Stevens' entry denial is well sourced and I think if the exact statute were notable it would be available from one of these sources. I will watchlist the article and attempt to bring any editors that think the addition is notable to the discussion page. If a consensus can be reached we can then reference that when confronting future attempts. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. See ya 'round Tide rolls 23:29, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
I just wanted to know if it works. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.137.123.57 ( talk) 00:31, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my user page! Antique Rose — Drop me a line 01:15, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Can you block User talk:96.236.39.22 because it's a logged out bot? WAYNE OLAJUWON 00:53, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Why do you keep reverting edits I made on an artical I put up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaysonclinkscal ( talk • contribs) 01:39, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Why did you just write me a message about how to address someone here?? What do you speak for the user...are you like one of them parrots that speak for mutes?? I will be careful in the future and try not to talk like that, but i dont like when people delete something i put when they themselve cant even write to me to tell me my information is false!! MajorHawke ( talk) 00:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
What i am adding is not true?
Blacks win the lowest % of medals at Olympics , less than Asians , blacks underachieve in 95% of sports, so why you can't accept the truth? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.138.183.195 ( talk) 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
I will bring so many facts from soccer , hockey , MMA , Olympic boxing and Estern Europeans dominating boxing from the day the communism collapsed , swimming , gymnastics , triathlon , 95% of sports that we whites dominate that will force you to delete this piece of shit of racism you posted!
I will also bring reliable sources and world records from shot put , hammer , pole vault , cycling , swimming , you name it, trust me , you messed with a nut case here , i will embarrass you and your black superiority theory ;)
I see you reverted the removal of the tag "living person" made by an IP. Please note that Nick Rizzuto is not a living person anymore. You might have been misled by your removal of the addition of copyrighted material before, which was not "dubious" as you described, but rather a copyvio.
Thanks. - CET TALK 02:34, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page, I appreciate it! -- TwistOfCain (talk) 21:33, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Please remove the septina florimonte effect from google search. I am being targeted. Google states you have to remove all the links to wiki. Please delete all articles in wiki about septina florimonte —Preceding unsigned comment added by Septina florimonte ( talk • contribs) 01:20, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Wiki please remove "the septina florimonte effect" from all search engines via wiki .This article was not meant to be published on google for all the world to see.It was posted in error.Please remove all visibility from google search.
Septina florimonte (
talk)
01:24, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
how long does google crawlers take to remove the article"the septina florimonte effect Septina florimonte ( talk) 01:32, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Can they delete article urgently..I am scared..Article was posted in error 01:32, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
This article the septina florimonte effect was osted for all the world to see in error.Please can you remove all links on wiki so septina florimonte can not be traced and send a request to google to remove from web crawler Septina florimonte ( talk) 02:55, 14 November 2010 (UTC)