The article Cashbean has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. After checking the article's 8 sources and doing a WP:BEFORE search, I could only find 1 source that passes GNG. [1] The other sources were not independent (sounded like press releases) or did not have significant coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. –
Novem Linguae (
talk)
17:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Regarding your !vote at this AfD, none of the entries listed are "big budget films." I'd also note that your rationales given at various technical colleges don't have any basis in policy that I can see. If you're going to participate in AfD discussions, you should do more than glance at the article, and be able to link any of your keep arguments to a relevant policy. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Tictictoc, you recently tagged an article ( Elliot Bogod) for notability, Please take this down. I made an effort to include a few links. 103.19.141.1 ( talk) 14:57, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
06:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
The article Cashbean has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. After checking the article's 8 sources and doing a WP:BEFORE search, I could only find 1 source that passes GNG. [1] The other sources were not independent (sounded like press releases) or did not have significant coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. –
Novem Linguae (
talk)
17:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Regarding your !vote at this AfD, none of the entries listed are "big budget films." I'd also note that your rationales given at various technical colleges don't have any basis in policy that I can see. If you're going to participate in AfD discussions, you should do more than glance at the article, and be able to link any of your keep arguments to a relevant policy. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Tictictoc, you recently tagged an article ( Elliot Bogod) for notability, Please take this down. I made an effort to include a few links. 103.19.141.1 ( talk) 14:57, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
06:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC)