From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Citation to another encyclopedia is not exactly a correct method, but we will assume that there is further evidence and this fact is verifiable. I am sorry if you were frustrated in trying to make this edit. Please understand that you cannot simple say that you learned something in school, therefore it is true and belongs in an encyclopedia. -- Mattarata 05:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Image copyright problem with Image:TheDeathandReturnofSuperman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TheDeathandReturnofSuperman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC) reply

This message is regarding the article Battle of Phuoc Me Long Time. Please do not create nonsense articles in Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia, take a look at the welcome page. If you'd like to give free rein to your imagination please check out the Uncyclopedia here. Thank you. Fan-1967 20:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC) reply


A tag has been placed on Ryan Jastroch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{ hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mytildebang 20:24, 20 December 2006 (UTC) reply

License tagging for Image:Noimagechar.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Noimagechar.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Speedy tags

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

  1. Place {{ hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
  2. Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Not a dog 17:27, 21 December 2006 (UTC) reply

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Nickelback has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 ( talk) 21:17, 15 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Nickelback. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Coldplay Expert 21:21, 15 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nickelback, you will be blocked from editing. -- Evb-wiki ( talk) 21:50, 15 October 2009 (UTC) reply

February 2010

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Justin Bieber. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -- Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 19:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Notice

The file File:Noimagechar.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:02, 16 March 2020 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Citation to another encyclopedia is not exactly a correct method, but we will assume that there is further evidence and this fact is verifiable. I am sorry if you were frustrated in trying to make this edit. Please understand that you cannot simple say that you learned something in school, therefore it is true and belongs in an encyclopedia. -- Mattarata 05:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Image copyright problem with Image:TheDeathandReturnofSuperman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TheDeathandReturnofSuperman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC) reply

This message is regarding the article Battle of Phuoc Me Long Time. Please do not create nonsense articles in Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia, take a look at the welcome page. If you'd like to give free rein to your imagination please check out the Uncyclopedia here. Thank you. Fan-1967 20:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC) reply


A tag has been placed on Ryan Jastroch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{ hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mytildebang 20:24, 20 December 2006 (UTC) reply

License tagging for Image:Noimagechar.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Noimagechar.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Speedy tags

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

  1. Place {{ hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
  2. Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Not a dog 17:27, 21 December 2006 (UTC) reply

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Nickelback has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 ( talk) 21:17, 15 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Nickelback. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Coldplay Expert 21:21, 15 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nickelback, you will be blocked from editing. -- Evb-wiki ( talk) 21:50, 15 October 2009 (UTC) reply

February 2010

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Justin Bieber. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -- Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 19:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Notice

The file File:Noimagechar.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:02, 16 March 2020 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook