So far, all of your edits have been attempting to add a reference to Monty Python and the Holy Grail in 3 (number), and one edit adding a WP:REDLINK to Christmas creep. Please discuss the former on Talk:3 (number) before attempting to add the "information", and do not add redlinks which are unlikely ever to be created. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:26, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm just letting you know that I removed all but one of the images from Anne Marie Ballowe Dawson-White. There is a difference between inserting good images and inserting tons of barely relevant images. Please limit inserting images to where they would prove useful and encyclopedic.
Also, please be aware that you are either at or close to the WP:3RR limit for making this change.
Thanks, Sven Manguard Wha? 07:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Anne Marie Ballowe Dawson-White. Users who
edit disruptively or refuse to
collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the
three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the
talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains
consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. I warned you that you were at the limit. Three editors have now removed the images, I advise that you stop now, the next time you insert images into the article, you're liable to get blocked.
Sven Manguard
Wha?
19:26, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I've reviewed Anne Marie Ballowe Dawson-White against the GA criteria, and I'm afraid the article doesn't meet the standard at this time. You can find my comments at Talk:Anne Marie Ballowe Dawson-White/GA1. -- Beloved Freak 10:38, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Julian Assange. It is considered
vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to
a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox.
Deacon of Pndapetzim (
Talk)
03:18, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Please get consensus on the talk page before trying to move a highly visible article like Bush tax cuts. And please see WP:COMMONNAME: it doesn't matter whether or not W. himself likes the name. Wasted Time R ( talk) 03:13, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
At Talk:Bush-Obama tax cuts, with this edit. Kelly hi! 03:10, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Thoroughgoodness, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Shirt58 (
talk)
10:16, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Thoroughgoodness, and it's thorough goodness to see you using edit summaries. But calling the last POTUS "chucklenuts" may land you in strife. While I've got a spotless record with the WP:CIVILITYPOLICE, there's a bulging manila folder about me down at the WP:HUMOURPOLICE HQ. Would hate to see you have the same, friend.-- Shirt58 ( talk) 10:44, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:General sanctions/Obama article probation, I am notifying you that any further disruptive editing on Obama-related topics, such as your move warring on Bush tax cuts will result in a block. -- SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 03:41, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 04:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
So far, all of your edits have been attempting to add a reference to Monty Python and the Holy Grail in 3 (number), and one edit adding a WP:REDLINK to Christmas creep. Please discuss the former on Talk:3 (number) before attempting to add the "information", and do not add redlinks which are unlikely ever to be created. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:26, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm just letting you know that I removed all but one of the images from Anne Marie Ballowe Dawson-White. There is a difference between inserting good images and inserting tons of barely relevant images. Please limit inserting images to where they would prove useful and encyclopedic.
Also, please be aware that you are either at or close to the WP:3RR limit for making this change.
Thanks, Sven Manguard Wha? 07:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Anne Marie Ballowe Dawson-White. Users who
edit disruptively or refuse to
collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the
three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the
talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains
consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. I warned you that you were at the limit. Three editors have now removed the images, I advise that you stop now, the next time you insert images into the article, you're liable to get blocked.
Sven Manguard
Wha?
19:26, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I've reviewed Anne Marie Ballowe Dawson-White against the GA criteria, and I'm afraid the article doesn't meet the standard at this time. You can find my comments at Talk:Anne Marie Ballowe Dawson-White/GA1. -- Beloved Freak 10:38, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Julian Assange. It is considered
vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to
a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox.
Deacon of Pndapetzim (
Talk)
03:18, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Please get consensus on the talk page before trying to move a highly visible article like Bush tax cuts. And please see WP:COMMONNAME: it doesn't matter whether or not W. himself likes the name. Wasted Time R ( talk) 03:13, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
At Talk:Bush-Obama tax cuts, with this edit. Kelly hi! 03:10, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Thoroughgoodness, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Shirt58 (
talk)
10:16, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Thoroughgoodness, and it's thorough goodness to see you using edit summaries. But calling the last POTUS "chucklenuts" may land you in strife. While I've got a spotless record with the WP:CIVILITYPOLICE, there's a bulging manila folder about me down at the WP:HUMOURPOLICE HQ. Would hate to see you have the same, friend.-- Shirt58 ( talk) 10:44, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:General sanctions/Obama article probation, I am notifying you that any further disruptive editing on Obama-related topics, such as your move warring on Bush tax cuts will result in a block. -- SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 03:41, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 04:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)