This is my Talk Page :) |
Let us keep things civil.
Please sign at the end with:
|
![]() |
---|
22 July 2024 |
|
This guy thinks hes some sort of wikipedia big shot
This shouldn't end in an edit war. The wording was blatantly partisan and doesn't belong in the article lead. It could be broken down, organized, and placed in individual sections such as medicinal uses, regulation, etc. but it shouldn't be crammed right into the article head with no inline citations. Also, the 'kratom association' section is a blatant violation of Wikipedia policy. We do not outright promote third parties by giving them their own sections in articles. Using them as a reference, however, is fine. Feel free to issue a request for comment.-- 76.177.89.200 ( talk) 04:36, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Some material, including direct quotations and contentious material about living persons must be provided with an inline citation every time it is mentioned, regardless of the level of generality or the location of the statement. [edit]Introductory text"", because the kratom articles lead section is cited elsewhere in the article, it is redundant to provide the same citations in the lead. It doesn't help the article. Also, deleting information from the lead that you KNOW is cited elsewhere in the article and claiming it is uncited is borderline vandalism. Please refrain. You know because I've told you multiple times and I have shown you the citations in the main body. ThorPorre ( talk) 03:41, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/20869223/ ThorPorre ( talk) 04:21, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mitragyna speciosa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thai ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:42, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mitragyna speciosa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Remedy ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:18, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
I notice that I'm not the first person to raise concerns with your editing at Mitragyna speciosa ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). This edit is a pretty egregious misrepresentation of the cited source. The source makes clear that kratom does have side effects (most of which are mild), and that it is addictive. You've cited the source to claim that there are no side effects. That's a problem. Please don't continue to use sources in this fashion. MastCell Talk 17:58, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Kratom psychosis (or overdose) has been reported haphazardly and remains a rare occurrence in the medical literature. Where such events take place, the symptoms can include convulsions, confusion, hallucinations, dizziness and headaches.
Some anecdotal reports indicate that potential intestinal blockages can occur from repeated daily chewing of kratom. The veins of the kratom leaf are reportedly high in one type of alkaloid that reduces intestinal motility to a point where a kratom paste can accumulate in the intestinal tract. ( [1])
ThorPorre ( talk) 01:34, 28 June 2013 (UTC)== Edit-warring ==
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
The edit-warring is aggravated by the fact that you're repeatedly removing sourced medical information and misrepresenting sources. MastCell Talk 00:00, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
As of June 29, the kratom article is a mess, just read the lead.. It stinks of anti-kratom bias, bringing up the questionable psychosis and hallucinations claim, and warning of dangers when mixing with other substances, in a vague and debatable way. I was wondering if maybe you could help straighten it up? Thanks in advance.-- Metalhead94 T C 00:19, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Template:Mitragyna speciosa has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Plantdrew (
talk)
03:56, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
This is my Talk Page :) |
Let us keep things civil.
Please sign at the end with:
|
![]() |
---|
22 July 2024 |
|
This guy thinks hes some sort of wikipedia big shot
This shouldn't end in an edit war. The wording was blatantly partisan and doesn't belong in the article lead. It could be broken down, organized, and placed in individual sections such as medicinal uses, regulation, etc. but it shouldn't be crammed right into the article head with no inline citations. Also, the 'kratom association' section is a blatant violation of Wikipedia policy. We do not outright promote third parties by giving them their own sections in articles. Using them as a reference, however, is fine. Feel free to issue a request for comment.-- 76.177.89.200 ( talk) 04:36, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Some material, including direct quotations and contentious material about living persons must be provided with an inline citation every time it is mentioned, regardless of the level of generality or the location of the statement. [edit]Introductory text"", because the kratom articles lead section is cited elsewhere in the article, it is redundant to provide the same citations in the lead. It doesn't help the article. Also, deleting information from the lead that you KNOW is cited elsewhere in the article and claiming it is uncited is borderline vandalism. Please refrain. You know because I've told you multiple times and I have shown you the citations in the main body. ThorPorre ( talk) 03:41, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/20869223/ ThorPorre ( talk) 04:21, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mitragyna speciosa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thai ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:42, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mitragyna speciosa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Remedy ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:18, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
I notice that I'm not the first person to raise concerns with your editing at Mitragyna speciosa ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). This edit is a pretty egregious misrepresentation of the cited source. The source makes clear that kratom does have side effects (most of which are mild), and that it is addictive. You've cited the source to claim that there are no side effects. That's a problem. Please don't continue to use sources in this fashion. MastCell Talk 17:58, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Kratom psychosis (or overdose) has been reported haphazardly and remains a rare occurrence in the medical literature. Where such events take place, the symptoms can include convulsions, confusion, hallucinations, dizziness and headaches.
Some anecdotal reports indicate that potential intestinal blockages can occur from repeated daily chewing of kratom. The veins of the kratom leaf are reportedly high in one type of alkaloid that reduces intestinal motility to a point where a kratom paste can accumulate in the intestinal tract. ( [1])
ThorPorre ( talk) 01:34, 28 June 2013 (UTC)== Edit-warring ==
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
The edit-warring is aggravated by the fact that you're repeatedly removing sourced medical information and misrepresenting sources. MastCell Talk 00:00, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
As of June 29, the kratom article is a mess, just read the lead.. It stinks of anti-kratom bias, bringing up the questionable psychosis and hallucinations claim, and warning of dangers when mixing with other substances, in a vague and debatable way. I was wondering if maybe you could help straighten it up? Thanks in advance.-- Metalhead94 T C 00:19, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Template:Mitragyna speciosa has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Plantdrew (
talk)
03:56, 4 August 2023 (UTC)