Hello, ThesePicklesLoveSosa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page London on da Track did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. Magnolia677 ( talk) 09:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Robvanvee. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
1017 Records, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Rob
van
vee
07:15, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Toosii, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you.
AshMusique (
talk)
07:39, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
BIG30, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Ss
112
09:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Dixie D'Amelio, you may be
blocked from editing.
Ss
112
23:35, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
DaBaby discography.
CAMERAwMUSTACHE (
talk)
19:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Lil Tecca, you may be
blocked from editing. —
JohnFromPinckney (
talk /
edits)
21:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Trap House III, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
TheAmazingPeanuts (
talk)
00:24, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
04:58, 30 May 2021 (UTC)ThesePicklesLoveSosa ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Well, could y'all at least tell me what I was blocked for? Because for my knowledge, all the edits I made today were sourced. And plus, you should give me a reason when I'm blocked. ThesePicklesLoveSosa ( talk) 05:05, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were given a reason in the notice above. If you don't think that you were disruptive, please explain why. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 06:57, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Well, yesterday I did a lot of edits with good sourcing. I was bad on sourcing back then, but I'm doing better at it. ThesePicklesLoveSosa ( talk) 14:38, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
And plus, y'all do not need to revert my sourced edits PURELY because I'm blocked for a short period of time. Can you tell me why you guys do that? ThesePicklesLoveSosa ( talk) 14:40, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
I have accepted your unblock request at UTRS appeal number 44183, and so your account is now unblocked. It seems to me very unlikely that you are the same person as TowerPizza, which was the reason for the block. JBW ( talk) 22:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Stop adding unsourced material. You have repeatedly been warned, even by an administrator, and yet, you are still here doing it even after being unblocked. Sergecross73 This user is still adding significant amounts of unsourced material, even after being warned by you. They're criticising others for doing so, then doing so themselves in the very next edit. Also, all unsourced peaks, unsourced, and unsourced again. The charts have updated on nztop40.co.nz, not on charts.nz, which is an archive that usually updates a few days later. Not instantly, so you need to provide an additional source when updating New Zealand peaks. Ss 112 01:40, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
02:39, 19 June 2021 (UTC)You should not be making edits with such large removals of content without explaining why. Is there any reason you've kept some singles while removing a lot of others? How else did Yung Bleu release those songs if not as separate singles? An editor should not need to come to your talk page to ask why you've done something. Please start leaving edit summaries. Thank you. Ss 112 21:28, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Do not use multiple
IP addresses to
disrupt Wikipedia. Such attempts to
avoid detection, circumvent policies or
evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been
reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Vanjagenije
(talk)
23:22, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, ThesePicklesLoveSosa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page London on da Track did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. Magnolia677 ( talk) 09:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Robvanvee. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
1017 Records, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Rob
van
vee
07:15, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Toosii, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you.
AshMusique (
talk)
07:39, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
BIG30, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Ss
112
09:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Dixie D'Amelio, you may be
blocked from editing.
Ss
112
23:35, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
DaBaby discography.
CAMERAwMUSTACHE (
talk)
19:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Lil Tecca, you may be
blocked from editing. —
JohnFromPinckney (
talk /
edits)
21:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Trap House III, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
TheAmazingPeanuts (
talk)
00:24, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
04:58, 30 May 2021 (UTC)ThesePicklesLoveSosa ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Well, could y'all at least tell me what I was blocked for? Because for my knowledge, all the edits I made today were sourced. And plus, you should give me a reason when I'm blocked. ThesePicklesLoveSosa ( talk) 05:05, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were given a reason in the notice above. If you don't think that you were disruptive, please explain why. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 06:57, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Well, yesterday I did a lot of edits with good sourcing. I was bad on sourcing back then, but I'm doing better at it. ThesePicklesLoveSosa ( talk) 14:38, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
And plus, y'all do not need to revert my sourced edits PURELY because I'm blocked for a short period of time. Can you tell me why you guys do that? ThesePicklesLoveSosa ( talk) 14:40, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
I have accepted your unblock request at UTRS appeal number 44183, and so your account is now unblocked. It seems to me very unlikely that you are the same person as TowerPizza, which was the reason for the block. JBW ( talk) 22:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Stop adding unsourced material. You have repeatedly been warned, even by an administrator, and yet, you are still here doing it even after being unblocked. Sergecross73 This user is still adding significant amounts of unsourced material, even after being warned by you. They're criticising others for doing so, then doing so themselves in the very next edit. Also, all unsourced peaks, unsourced, and unsourced again. The charts have updated on nztop40.co.nz, not on charts.nz, which is an archive that usually updates a few days later. Not instantly, so you need to provide an additional source when updating New Zealand peaks. Ss 112 01:40, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
02:39, 19 June 2021 (UTC)You should not be making edits with such large removals of content without explaining why. Is there any reason you've kept some singles while removing a lot of others? How else did Yung Bleu release those songs if not as separate singles? An editor should not need to come to your talk page to ask why you've done something. Please start leaving edit summaries. Thank you. Ss 112 21:28, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Do not use multiple
IP addresses to
disrupt Wikipedia. Such attempts to
avoid detection, circumvent policies or
evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been
reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Vanjagenije
(talk)
23:22, 31 October 2021 (UTC)