Hello, Themostoriginalusernameever, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DES (talk) DESiegel Contribs 18:30, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I wanted to explain why I reverted this edit. You seemed to add your own personal interpretation of a film's reception, in violation of our policy against original research. We need a reliable source to come to these conclusions. You can directly quote a review aggregator, such as Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic, but you can't make up your own Rotten Tomatoes-style consensus. What I usually do is quote the official Rotten Tomatoes consensus if I need some kind of summary statement about a film's reception. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 03:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Allninemice. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Norm of the North—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
~ANM🐁
T·
C 20:01, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Norm of the North. --
Mr Fink (
talk) 20:48, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Fantastic Four (2015 film). Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. –
wallyfromdilbert (
talk) 03:27, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Betty Logan. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
List of biggest box-office bombs without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Betty Logan (
talk) 14:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
List of biggest box-office bombs, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Betty Logan (
talk) 23:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Themostoriginalusernameever, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DES (talk) DESiegel Contribs 18:30, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I wanted to explain why I reverted this edit. You seemed to add your own personal interpretation of a film's reception, in violation of our policy against original research. We need a reliable source to come to these conclusions. You can directly quote a review aggregator, such as Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic, but you can't make up your own Rotten Tomatoes-style consensus. What I usually do is quote the official Rotten Tomatoes consensus if I need some kind of summary statement about a film's reception. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 03:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Allninemice. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Norm of the North—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
~ANM🐁
T·
C 20:01, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Norm of the North. --
Mr Fink (
talk) 20:48, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Fantastic Four (2015 film). Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. –
wallyfromdilbert (
talk) 03:27, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Betty Logan. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
List of biggest box-office bombs without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Betty Logan (
talk) 14:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
List of biggest box-office bombs, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Betty Logan (
talk) 23:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)