This is Theglobalbiz's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello, Theglobalbiz!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
19:35, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
|
Please do not resubmit the draft without addressing the reasons it was declined. You added a number of YouTube links, but what was required was reliable sources – please take a moment to click on the links in the yellow box above, and read up on what Wikipedia means by "reliable source". Thanks, -- bonadea contributions talk 17:36, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Archana Singh, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
bonadea
contributions
talk
11:21, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, this change didn't seem constructive to me, so I reverted it. Categories should only be added to articles when it is clear through article content why they were added. Since her article has no properly sourced date of birth, it would not be appropriate to add a year of birth for her. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 20:07, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello Theglobalbiz. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Priyanka NK (2), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:Theglobalbiz. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Theglobalbiz|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. With the creation of a second article about Priyanka NK, after you were told that the version you previously created was insufficient for live space, it's starting to look like you're here to promote the subject. If that's not the case, I strongly advise you to cool your jets and stop wasting the community's time with problematic articles. Note also that
conflicts of interest are serious ethical issues.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
21:26, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
This edit from 25 August, as well as this edit from 25 July are a waste of the community's time. If you're not going to bother to build the article so that it properly demonstrates the subject's notability, then you should not be resubmitting it for evaluation. You're wasting the time of other editors who in good-faith have to sift through to see what's been changed, and from my perspective, it looks like you're trying to game the system. Stop it, please. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:24, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Missvain ( talk) 19:07, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Hello, Theglobalbiz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Archana Singh".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 06:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Theglobalbiz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mirnaa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, you recently moved this draft into mainspace. Like one of the reviewer said, a single role in a film does not meet mean she meets WP:ENT. So I would like to request you to not move such drafts from mainspace. If you think the subject is notable, ask for an AFC reviewer to review it rather than moving it yourself or you may ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Regards Kichu🐘 Need any help? 08:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Theglobalbiz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Priyanka NK, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 10:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Theglobalbiz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Priyanka NK".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 14:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Tanya Unni, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Giraffer ( talk· contribs) 09:57, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Birthmark (2023 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFILM, no reviews found in a BEFORE
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DonaldD23
talk to me
12:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
You can't simply remove the first two films of Mirnaa Menon because they are low-profile. Films are films. DareshMohan ( talk) 19:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
This is Theglobalbiz's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello, Theglobalbiz!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
19:35, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
|
Please do not resubmit the draft without addressing the reasons it was declined. You added a number of YouTube links, but what was required was reliable sources – please take a moment to click on the links in the yellow box above, and read up on what Wikipedia means by "reliable source". Thanks, -- bonadea contributions talk 17:36, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Archana Singh, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
bonadea
contributions
talk
11:21, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, this change didn't seem constructive to me, so I reverted it. Categories should only be added to articles when it is clear through article content why they were added. Since her article has no properly sourced date of birth, it would not be appropriate to add a year of birth for her. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 20:07, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello Theglobalbiz. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Priyanka NK (2), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:Theglobalbiz. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Theglobalbiz|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. With the creation of a second article about Priyanka NK, after you were told that the version you previously created was insufficient for live space, it's starting to look like you're here to promote the subject. If that's not the case, I strongly advise you to cool your jets and stop wasting the community's time with problematic articles. Note also that
conflicts of interest are serious ethical issues.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
21:26, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
This edit from 25 August, as well as this edit from 25 July are a waste of the community's time. If you're not going to bother to build the article so that it properly demonstrates the subject's notability, then you should not be resubmitting it for evaluation. You're wasting the time of other editors who in good-faith have to sift through to see what's been changed, and from my perspective, it looks like you're trying to game the system. Stop it, please. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:24, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Missvain ( talk) 19:07, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Hello, Theglobalbiz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Archana Singh".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 06:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Theglobalbiz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mirnaa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, you recently moved this draft into mainspace. Like one of the reviewer said, a single role in a film does not meet mean she meets WP:ENT. So I would like to request you to not move such drafts from mainspace. If you think the subject is notable, ask for an AFC reviewer to review it rather than moving it yourself or you may ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Regards Kichu🐘 Need any help? 08:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Theglobalbiz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Priyanka NK, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 10:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Theglobalbiz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Priyanka NK".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 14:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Tanya Unni, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Giraffer ( talk· contribs) 09:57, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Birthmark (2023 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFILM, no reviews found in a BEFORE
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DonaldD23
talk to me
12:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
You can't simply remove the first two films of Mirnaa Menon because they are low-profile. Films are films. DareshMohan ( talk) 19:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)