Speedy deletion nomination of HelpMaster
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on HelpMaster, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,
. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit
the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any
citations from independent
reliable sources to ensure that the article will be
verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Alpert1 (
talk)
15:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- Why not copy it to your user space (such as User:Thecoffeeboss/Helpmaster } where you can work on it and get other experienced editors to review it. That way you can hang on to it for a while and develop it. Otherwise it is likely to be gone in a few minutes. Regards This comment also copied to article talk page ) Velella Velella Talk 16:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- The article requires third party reliable sources in order to establish notability. Please have a look at WP:NOTE for more information. Longwayround ( talk) 13:27, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Just a suggestion which you may choose to ignore, but most editors get into the swing of Wikipedia by getting involved in routine editing tasks, improving other articles and getting to know the system. Nobody starting a new job tries to write a new company policy on the first day. Your obvious frustration might be eased somewhat by getting some experience under your belt. If Helpmaster is as significant as you say, I am sure it will wait another few weeks before it gets its own article - if it is notable enough to deserve one. Velella Velella Talk 16:40, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of HelpMaster
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on HelpMaster, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,
. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit
the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any
citations from independent
reliable sources to ensure that the article will be
verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Alpert1 (
talk)
15:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- Why not copy it to your user space (such as User:Thecoffeeboss/Helpmaster } where you can work on it and get other experienced editors to review it. That way you can hang on to it for a while and develop it. Otherwise it is likely to be gone in a few minutes. Regards This comment also copied to article talk page ) Velella Velella Talk 16:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- The article requires third party reliable sources in order to establish notability. Please have a look at WP:NOTE for more information. Longwayround ( talk) 13:27, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Just a suggestion which you may choose to ignore, but most editors get into the swing of Wikipedia by getting involved in routine editing tasks, improving other articles and getting to know the system. Nobody starting a new job tries to write a new company policy on the first day. Your obvious frustration might be eased somewhat by getting some experience under your belt. If Helpmaster is as significant as you say, I am sure it will wait another few weeks before it gets its own article - if it is notable enough to deserve one. Velella Velella Talk 16:40, 11 January 2012 (UTC)