Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nancy Pelosi, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nancy Pelosi was changed by The Uber Mensch (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957461 on 2011-07-27T00:39:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 00:40, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Nancy Pelosi, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Dayewalker (
talk)
00:50, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Elockid (
Talk)
00:57, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
The Uber Mensch ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have done nothing to deserve a block. Please unblock me at once. Thank you, and God bless America!
Decline reason:
All of your edits to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi have been disruptive and disparaging, and you well know that. Even the GOP themselves would be ashamed that you would stoop to such low and puerile tactics. – MuZemike 01:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The Uber Mensch ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
But the edits are factual, and I have freedom of speech that you are infringing on.
Decline reason:
I think we're done here. Kuru (talk) 01:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nancy Pelosi, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nancy Pelosi was changed by The Uber Mensch (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957461 on 2011-07-27T00:39:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 00:40, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Nancy Pelosi, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Dayewalker (
talk)
00:50, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Elockid (
Talk)
00:57, 27 July 2011 (UTC)The Uber Mensch ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have done nothing to deserve a block. Please unblock me at once. Thank you, and God bless America!
Decline reason:
All of your edits to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi have been disruptive and disparaging, and you well know that. Even the GOP themselves would be ashamed that you would stoop to such low and puerile tactics. – MuZemike 01:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The Uber Mensch ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
But the edits are factual, and I have freedom of speech that you are infringing on.
Decline reason:
I think we're done here. Kuru (talk) 01:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.