Task completed
: Old characters count = 370 new count = 234.
Redacted and re-submitted, redacted 2, moved to Talk:List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States
Task completed
I have kept all functionality, removed dead link, added all player as per eeal.au, reduced overall size by over 2/3rds (prior to adding 2013 and missed players) this should improve loading time significantly, I have saved all my work and can adjust with relative ease anything as required, so please advise, comment or offer suggestions etc
The Original Filfi (
talk) 02:59, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Task completed, good work botsHello The Original Filfi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
Golden Bay-Motukea Rugby union, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Does not redirect to a different or incorrect namespace. Thank you.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 13:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{admin help-helped}} on this page with {{admin help}}, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Hi Admin or Editor Guru's, possibly a tricky one to brighten or ruin your day, I hope it is the former, I am contributing to some listing articles which are sourced directly from the authority, in this particular case, UK Legislation, some spelling and grammar errors exist on the actual legislation and these have been passed into law with the errors intact, so my question is twofold;
1. Should I replicate with errors intact, and if so.
2. How can I stop a bot, such as AWB correcting these.
Although technically correct to do so on 99% of the articles on our wiki, in this case I think we need to be exact.
Kind regards
The Original Filfi (
talk) 11:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, what was wrong with the two List of Statutory Instruments of the United Kingdom, 2010 edits you reverted? Thanks for explanation. By the way, since you edit more of these List of Statutory Instruments of the United Kingdom articles, could you comment on what is their purpose? List of Statutory Instruments of the United Kingdom, 2010 does not provide us with more information than its source ( http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010) As I see it, added value would be only in wikilinks, but all these articles are underlinked. WikiHannibal ( talk) 10:53, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello - you reverted my spelling correction to the title of SI 2011/45 (Juction to Junction). It looks to me as if the title in the SI as issued is spelt correctly and the spelling mistake is in the link on the legislation.gov.uk website. As no entries in the list are externally linked I think it is better that the correct as issued spelling be used but I am not going to fuss about a list which I will probably never visit again - up to you. Regards. Orenburg1 ( talk) 18:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Regards. Orenburg1 ( talk) 15:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
The following is a shortened list of monastic houses in
Greater Manchester for pog experiments by TOF for (Sir/King) John's review, England.
Click on pog to go to linked article, as per normal or old/existing practice, and new click on name to interlink to this pages entry.
Foundation | Image | Communities & Provenance | Formal Name or Dedication & Alternative Names |
wikimapia location Guide |
---|---|---|---|---|
Warburton Priory# [1] | Premonstratensian Canons cell, daughter of Cockersand, Lancashire; founded c.1200 church of St Mary and St Werburgh granted to Cockersand by Adam of Dutton; abandoned before 1271 |
Warburton Cell |
Satellite 53°24′07.6"N-02°27′26.2W Mapped 53°24′07.6"N-02°27′26.2W |
Hi There, I've just taken a look at the List of monastic houses in England and scrolled down to the Greater Manchester entry - you might just want to do the same before rolling it out to the other counties. JohnArmagh ( talk) 13:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi JohnArmagh, I list these in a kind of process order.
Can you review the following, especially my terminology etc on the lead sections of;
Please then review the List of monastic houses in Greater Manchester article, where I amended;
Please then review the List of monastic houses in England#Greater Manchester where I amended;
I will rest on any further amendments or rolling this out onto any other counties until your complete review (and if required a further review by other interested parties), I will then action any and all amendments required for the above only on that advice and then if needed allow a further review period.Cheers. The Original Filfi ( talk) 00:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello The Original Filfi! Just a notice that I moved the contents of Wikipedians in New Zealand user boxes (a page you created) over to Category:Wikipedians in New Zealand a preferred location for this. Best, ///EuroCar GT 03:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
72nd New York Volunteer Infantry Regiment may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 06:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi Admins and or Editor Guru's, A weird one for you.... and as before, possibly a tricky one to brighten or ruin your day, I hope it is the former
Is it possible to find which pages/articles have a width property that extends beyond the normal page width? or to re-phrase, Is it possible to find which pages/articles have the need for two scroll bars, both the standard and acceptable vertical scroll bar and the much less desirable horizontal scroll bar? Thank you.
The Original Filfi (
talk) 12:42, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Huon, thank you for the answer, I though that may be the case. Really I was only looking at the standard page width i.e. wikipedias standard article page width vs outside of those parameters. I have seen some lovely articles with "in-page" scroll bars, showing panorama's, the periodic table (large) etc and I have no issue with any of those, I was more focusing on;
and the like of the above. I was going to try to reformat, if possible, trying to improve the ease of navigation of those articles. Obviously not all articles that exceed these dimension are necessarily incorrectly formatted or indeed that a suitable solution exist, as in the F1 tables, they give a lot of information and there may not be a better way to provide and display this.
Kind regards
The Original Filfi (
talk) 03:23, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi The Original Filfi. FYI, I have reverted your changes to Jordan 197, returning the article to the WP:FORMULA1 standard format, for consistency with the 400-or-so other F1 car articles. Regards. DH85868993 ( talk) 13:36, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
The article Ancient cities and towns visited by Hsüan-tsang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
JacobiJonesJr (
talk) 03:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of members of the Pan-African Parliament, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi. It was a spam blog (from what I recall), so you can go ahead and remove it. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi
Thanks for your imput. Much appreciated Weglinde ( talk) 09:56, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi
Some time ago you offered help if ever I needed it.
/info/en/?search=User:Weglinde/sandbox
I would appreciate your help. When I tried to upload this article from my sandbox the request was rejected but frankly I did not really understand why. Would it be possible for you to look into this for me.
The rejection stated- We are sorry, but your edit can not be completed at this time. Your contribution appears to contain a link to archiving service archive.today / archive.is. In accordance with Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC, links to the archive.is family are not allowed to be added to Wikipedia. Please feel free to make your contribution with a non-archived URL or a URL from a different archiving service (such as web.archive.org). If you believe this message is in error, we apologize for the inconvenience, and ask that you please report this error for correction and assistance.
Thanks for your help Weglinde ( talk) 07:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Weglinde, the ref in "==Head of Mademoiselle Suzanne Ursault==" is causing the conflict, is there another source you could use? or you could try, remove the ref and or section, upload and then replace when a new source has been found. The Original Filfi ( talk) 20:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Brilliant! Article now loaded. Could not find another source for Head of Mademoiselle Suzanne Ursault but not crucial so removed. /info/en/?search=Claude_Grange Your help much appreciated. Weglinde ( talk) 11:09, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Please do not blank or delete "Foo (disambiguation)" redirects to "Foo" disambiguation pages. These are required by WP:INTDABLINK for the orderly operation of the project. Cheers! bd2412 T 14:35, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Category:Important Geological Sites, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:33, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
I reverted your edit to Baron Grantchester, as the template you added is intended for the article talk page, and it's already there at Talk:Baron Grantchester. I see that you've added the same template to other article pages, so would you please revert your edits. -- David Biddulph ( talk) 06:56, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
The problem with the unmatched curly brackets in your reverts (reported in the section below) seems to apply to many articles. Please correct them. -- David Biddulph ( talk) 09:50, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
I am about to revert your pair of *un*matching edits, which have left lots of unmatched curly brackets. Perhaps you are using a script or something which you should check? And if you know about titles and things, please just look at my comment on the talk page. Thanks! Imaginatorium ( talk) 08:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
A Design for Life may have broken the
syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 10:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Agatha Christie may have broken the
syntax by modifying 3 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:00, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Adson's sign may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:05, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Since when is a valid parameter of {{ cite web}} superfluous? Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:31, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Just wondering why you're bulk stripping all these? If an EL fails and has to be recovered from an archive site (a not uncommon event), this date is helpful for recovering the link. Andy Dingley ( talk) 14:52, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
|accessdate=
. —
Sladen (
talk) 15:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
|accessdate=
removals was in relation to a website.
[1]. This was the third diff I reviwed. Please could you: (a) clarify precisely the configuration of the "auto save" mode setting for the operation of AWB on your account, (b) assist in the revision and clean-up of the whole lot. It extremely hard to be able to perform any sort of satisfactory oversight at a speed of twelve-edits-per-minute. (One every five seconds). —
Sladen (
talk) 17:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
|url=
[2], and the next one after it
Allah by populating the |url=
+ the rest of the {{
cite}}
and consolidating the refs.
[3]. Yes, this is time-consuming but these are useful edits and something that perhaps I could encourage you to put your energy into, rather than the high-speed destructive deletion of carefully inserted material that is needed for later identification of source material. —
Sladen (
talk) 17:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
|url=
, and
All in the Air at Once,
[6]. I sincerely hope the rest of your automated editing does not have this astounding error-rate. —
Sladen (
talk) 20:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi @ Beyond My Ken: even if I manually did the above, rather than trying to clear these errors using awb, the access date would by necessity and for accuracy sake need to be changed, re-instating this piece of fiction added nothing. Being a pedant and striving for accuracy is not such a bad thing for a wiki editor many of us show these traits, while also accusing others of the same. Finally then, rather than reverting my edit why did you not add this url and add a new access date to completely resolve this issue? The Original Filfi ( talk) 14:45, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi @ Sladen:, I read two (a)'s above, the first "(a) clarify precisely the configuration of the "auto save" mode setting for the operation of AWB on your account", as far as I am aware there is no "auto save" mode, so no configuration. The second (a) "(a) the mode AWB is being operated in on your account", if I read this correctly this is a repeat of the above and my answer is the same, if, however it is a reference to a module, and for completeness, I have no modules loaded or being operated on my account. The Original Filfi ( talk) 10:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi @ Sladen:, The changes were reviewed at a glance, in 95% of cases, as only the changes were highlighted in the top section of awb, the few of the articles that had more than 2 access dates removed, needed a scroll down of two or so more clicks. I then manually pressed "save" for each and every edit. The Original Filfi ( talk) 11:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Liz
Read!
Talk! 15:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
I've reviewed your last edit [11] which introduced an error in conversion of a date from ISO to mdy format. I've now corrected this [12]. Reviewing MOS:DATEFORMAT we can see that ISO is an acceptable format for refs/tables, therefore I'm unclear about the basis for performing conversion, could you point me to it? — Sladen ( talk) 02:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Because the US-Military use both NATO (dmy) and US-customary (mdy) dates formats it's not possible to do an automated conversion when both numbers are less-than-or-equal to twelve. This is probably why these weren't already converted. An obviously ambiguous date is better than an non-obviously incorrect date. I've corrected a bunch these automated edits, by checking the cited source and the style used on that particular website: [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] as well as one where the pattern matcher failed to notice the year having five digits. [22] Please could you work through the remaining few dozen so that the burden is not placed entirely up on other editors to clean-up afterwards. — Sladen ( talk) 03:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This
[23] was extremely laborious to correct
[24]. Please could you do a similar rescue + repair job to
[25] as the error-rate is probably similar (without needing to check the URLs, I can see an |accessdate=
apparently preceding its |date=
. —
Sladen (
talk) 05:15, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, The Original Filfi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, The Original Filfi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, The Original Filfi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello The Original Filfi! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 17:18, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Sorry for having to revert your edits! The story you were attempting to post about was already featured on Portal:Current events/2021 September 8. Also if you ever have any questions on formatting or how to post stories check out Wikipedia:How the Current events page works, it should answer most if not all your questions. Cheers! -- Newsjunky12 ( talk) 01:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, The Original Filfi!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —
IVORK
Talk 00:51, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Thanks IVORK Talk, done part 1 for now. I will try to add some more senators and I will work on reference's for my McCoonnell blurb, lol The Original Filfi ( talk) 03:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, The Original Filfi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
User:The Original Filfi/List of republican responses to the 2020 presidential elections, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 02:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, The Original Filfi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
User:The Original Filfi/The big lie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 04:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, The Original Filfi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " The big lie".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
After reading your edit summary about the New York Times citation in Elizabeth Montgomery, I added a link to an archived copy of the article, so the content is now available outside of the paywall. Eddie Blick ( talk) 23:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Constitution of Kazakhstan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kazak. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
You cannot demand that other editors tell you their views about Donald Trump before making, or as part of making, an edit. Instead of edit warring, please discuss your concerns on the article talk page. 331dot ( talk) 08:16, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 16:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.
Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.
Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede 66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Task completed
: Old characters count = 370 new count = 234.
Redacted and re-submitted, redacted 2, moved to Talk:List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States
Task completed
I have kept all functionality, removed dead link, added all player as per eeal.au, reduced overall size by over 2/3rds (prior to adding 2013 and missed players) this should improve loading time significantly, I have saved all my work and can adjust with relative ease anything as required, so please advise, comment or offer suggestions etc
The Original Filfi (
talk) 02:59, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Task completed, good work botsHello The Original Filfi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
Golden Bay-Motukea Rugby union, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Does not redirect to a different or incorrect namespace. Thank you.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 13:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{admin help-helped}} on this page with {{admin help}}, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Hi Admin or Editor Guru's, possibly a tricky one to brighten or ruin your day, I hope it is the former, I am contributing to some listing articles which are sourced directly from the authority, in this particular case, UK Legislation, some spelling and grammar errors exist on the actual legislation and these have been passed into law with the errors intact, so my question is twofold;
1. Should I replicate with errors intact, and if so.
2. How can I stop a bot, such as AWB correcting these.
Although technically correct to do so on 99% of the articles on our wiki, in this case I think we need to be exact.
Kind regards
The Original Filfi (
talk) 11:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, what was wrong with the two List of Statutory Instruments of the United Kingdom, 2010 edits you reverted? Thanks for explanation. By the way, since you edit more of these List of Statutory Instruments of the United Kingdom articles, could you comment on what is their purpose? List of Statutory Instruments of the United Kingdom, 2010 does not provide us with more information than its source ( http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010) As I see it, added value would be only in wikilinks, but all these articles are underlinked. WikiHannibal ( talk) 10:53, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello - you reverted my spelling correction to the title of SI 2011/45 (Juction to Junction). It looks to me as if the title in the SI as issued is spelt correctly and the spelling mistake is in the link on the legislation.gov.uk website. As no entries in the list are externally linked I think it is better that the correct as issued spelling be used but I am not going to fuss about a list which I will probably never visit again - up to you. Regards. Orenburg1 ( talk) 18:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Regards. Orenburg1 ( talk) 15:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
The following is a shortened list of monastic houses in
Greater Manchester for pog experiments by TOF for (Sir/King) John's review, England.
Click on pog to go to linked article, as per normal or old/existing practice, and new click on name to interlink to this pages entry.
Foundation | Image | Communities & Provenance | Formal Name or Dedication & Alternative Names |
wikimapia location Guide |
---|---|---|---|---|
Warburton Priory# [1] | Premonstratensian Canons cell, daughter of Cockersand, Lancashire; founded c.1200 church of St Mary and St Werburgh granted to Cockersand by Adam of Dutton; abandoned before 1271 |
Warburton Cell |
Satellite 53°24′07.6"N-02°27′26.2W Mapped 53°24′07.6"N-02°27′26.2W |
Hi There, I've just taken a look at the List of monastic houses in England and scrolled down to the Greater Manchester entry - you might just want to do the same before rolling it out to the other counties. JohnArmagh ( talk) 13:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi JohnArmagh, I list these in a kind of process order.
Can you review the following, especially my terminology etc on the lead sections of;
Please then review the List of monastic houses in Greater Manchester article, where I amended;
Please then review the List of monastic houses in England#Greater Manchester where I amended;
I will rest on any further amendments or rolling this out onto any other counties until your complete review (and if required a further review by other interested parties), I will then action any and all amendments required for the above only on that advice and then if needed allow a further review period.Cheers. The Original Filfi ( talk) 00:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello The Original Filfi! Just a notice that I moved the contents of Wikipedians in New Zealand user boxes (a page you created) over to Category:Wikipedians in New Zealand a preferred location for this. Best, ///EuroCar GT 03:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
72nd New York Volunteer Infantry Regiment may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 06:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi Admins and or Editor Guru's, A weird one for you.... and as before, possibly a tricky one to brighten or ruin your day, I hope it is the former
Is it possible to find which pages/articles have a width property that extends beyond the normal page width? or to re-phrase, Is it possible to find which pages/articles have the need for two scroll bars, both the standard and acceptable vertical scroll bar and the much less desirable horizontal scroll bar? Thank you.
The Original Filfi (
talk) 12:42, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Huon, thank you for the answer, I though that may be the case. Really I was only looking at the standard page width i.e. wikipedias standard article page width vs outside of those parameters. I have seen some lovely articles with "in-page" scroll bars, showing panorama's, the periodic table (large) etc and I have no issue with any of those, I was more focusing on;
and the like of the above. I was going to try to reformat, if possible, trying to improve the ease of navigation of those articles. Obviously not all articles that exceed these dimension are necessarily incorrectly formatted or indeed that a suitable solution exist, as in the F1 tables, they give a lot of information and there may not be a better way to provide and display this.
Kind regards
The Original Filfi (
talk) 03:23, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi The Original Filfi. FYI, I have reverted your changes to Jordan 197, returning the article to the WP:FORMULA1 standard format, for consistency with the 400-or-so other F1 car articles. Regards. DH85868993 ( talk) 13:36, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
The article Ancient cities and towns visited by Hsüan-tsang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
JacobiJonesJr (
talk) 03:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of members of the Pan-African Parliament, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi. It was a spam blog (from what I recall), so you can go ahead and remove it. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi
Thanks for your imput. Much appreciated Weglinde ( talk) 09:56, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi
Some time ago you offered help if ever I needed it.
/info/en/?search=User:Weglinde/sandbox
I would appreciate your help. When I tried to upload this article from my sandbox the request was rejected but frankly I did not really understand why. Would it be possible for you to look into this for me.
The rejection stated- We are sorry, but your edit can not be completed at this time. Your contribution appears to contain a link to archiving service archive.today / archive.is. In accordance with Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC, links to the archive.is family are not allowed to be added to Wikipedia. Please feel free to make your contribution with a non-archived URL or a URL from a different archiving service (such as web.archive.org). If you believe this message is in error, we apologize for the inconvenience, and ask that you please report this error for correction and assistance.
Thanks for your help Weglinde ( talk) 07:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Weglinde, the ref in "==Head of Mademoiselle Suzanne Ursault==" is causing the conflict, is there another source you could use? or you could try, remove the ref and or section, upload and then replace when a new source has been found. The Original Filfi ( talk) 20:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Brilliant! Article now loaded. Could not find another source for Head of Mademoiselle Suzanne Ursault but not crucial so removed. /info/en/?search=Claude_Grange Your help much appreciated. Weglinde ( talk) 11:09, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Please do not blank or delete "Foo (disambiguation)" redirects to "Foo" disambiguation pages. These are required by WP:INTDABLINK for the orderly operation of the project. Cheers! bd2412 T 14:35, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Category:Important Geological Sites, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:33, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
I reverted your edit to Baron Grantchester, as the template you added is intended for the article talk page, and it's already there at Talk:Baron Grantchester. I see that you've added the same template to other article pages, so would you please revert your edits. -- David Biddulph ( talk) 06:56, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
The problem with the unmatched curly brackets in your reverts (reported in the section below) seems to apply to many articles. Please correct them. -- David Biddulph ( talk) 09:50, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
I am about to revert your pair of *un*matching edits, which have left lots of unmatched curly brackets. Perhaps you are using a script or something which you should check? And if you know about titles and things, please just look at my comment on the talk page. Thanks! Imaginatorium ( talk) 08:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
A Design for Life may have broken the
syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 10:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Agatha Christie may have broken the
syntax by modifying 3 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:00, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Adson's sign may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:05, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Since when is a valid parameter of {{ cite web}} superfluous? Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:31, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Just wondering why you're bulk stripping all these? If an EL fails and has to be recovered from an archive site (a not uncommon event), this date is helpful for recovering the link. Andy Dingley ( talk) 14:52, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
|accessdate=
. —
Sladen (
talk) 15:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
|accessdate=
removals was in relation to a website.
[1]. This was the third diff I reviwed. Please could you: (a) clarify precisely the configuration of the "auto save" mode setting for the operation of AWB on your account, (b) assist in the revision and clean-up of the whole lot. It extremely hard to be able to perform any sort of satisfactory oversight at a speed of twelve-edits-per-minute. (One every five seconds). —
Sladen (
talk) 17:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
|url=
[2], and the next one after it
Allah by populating the |url=
+ the rest of the {{
cite}}
and consolidating the refs.
[3]. Yes, this is time-consuming but these are useful edits and something that perhaps I could encourage you to put your energy into, rather than the high-speed destructive deletion of carefully inserted material that is needed for later identification of source material. —
Sladen (
talk) 17:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
|url=
, and
All in the Air at Once,
[6]. I sincerely hope the rest of your automated editing does not have this astounding error-rate. —
Sladen (
talk) 20:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi @ Beyond My Ken: even if I manually did the above, rather than trying to clear these errors using awb, the access date would by necessity and for accuracy sake need to be changed, re-instating this piece of fiction added nothing. Being a pedant and striving for accuracy is not such a bad thing for a wiki editor many of us show these traits, while also accusing others of the same. Finally then, rather than reverting my edit why did you not add this url and add a new access date to completely resolve this issue? The Original Filfi ( talk) 14:45, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi @ Sladen:, I read two (a)'s above, the first "(a) clarify precisely the configuration of the "auto save" mode setting for the operation of AWB on your account", as far as I am aware there is no "auto save" mode, so no configuration. The second (a) "(a) the mode AWB is being operated in on your account", if I read this correctly this is a repeat of the above and my answer is the same, if, however it is a reference to a module, and for completeness, I have no modules loaded or being operated on my account. The Original Filfi ( talk) 10:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi @ Sladen:, The changes were reviewed at a glance, in 95% of cases, as only the changes were highlighted in the top section of awb, the few of the articles that had more than 2 access dates removed, needed a scroll down of two or so more clicks. I then manually pressed "save" for each and every edit. The Original Filfi ( talk) 11:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Liz
Read!
Talk! 15:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
I've reviewed your last edit [11] which introduced an error in conversion of a date from ISO to mdy format. I've now corrected this [12]. Reviewing MOS:DATEFORMAT we can see that ISO is an acceptable format for refs/tables, therefore I'm unclear about the basis for performing conversion, could you point me to it? — Sladen ( talk) 02:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Because the US-Military use both NATO (dmy) and US-customary (mdy) dates formats it's not possible to do an automated conversion when both numbers are less-than-or-equal to twelve. This is probably why these weren't already converted. An obviously ambiguous date is better than an non-obviously incorrect date. I've corrected a bunch these automated edits, by checking the cited source and the style used on that particular website: [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] as well as one where the pattern matcher failed to notice the year having five digits. [22] Please could you work through the remaining few dozen so that the burden is not placed entirely up on other editors to clean-up afterwards. — Sladen ( talk) 03:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This
[23] was extremely laborious to correct
[24]. Please could you do a similar rescue + repair job to
[25] as the error-rate is probably similar (without needing to check the URLs, I can see an |accessdate=
apparently preceding its |date=
. —
Sladen (
talk) 05:15, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, The Original Filfi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, The Original Filfi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, The Original Filfi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello The Original Filfi! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 17:18, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Sorry for having to revert your edits! The story you were attempting to post about was already featured on Portal:Current events/2021 September 8. Also if you ever have any questions on formatting or how to post stories check out Wikipedia:How the Current events page works, it should answer most if not all your questions. Cheers! -- Newsjunky12 ( talk) 01:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, The Original Filfi!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —
IVORK
Talk 00:51, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Thanks IVORK Talk, done part 1 for now. I will try to add some more senators and I will work on reference's for my McCoonnell blurb, lol The Original Filfi ( talk) 03:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, The Original Filfi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
User:The Original Filfi/List of republican responses to the 2020 presidential elections, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 02:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, The Original Filfi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
User:The Original Filfi/The big lie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 04:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, The Original Filfi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " The big lie".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
After reading your edit summary about the New York Times citation in Elizabeth Montgomery, I added a link to an archived copy of the article, so the content is now available outside of the paywall. Eddie Blick ( talk) 23:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Constitution of Kazakhstan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kazak. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
You cannot demand that other editors tell you their views about Donald Trump before making, or as part of making, an edit. Instead of edit warring, please discuss your concerns on the article talk page. 331dot ( talk) 08:16, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 16:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.
Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.
Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede 66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)