![]() Archives |
---|
This sounds silly from one stranger to another stranger.
Since I made that stupid error about the picture I've been keeping track. You seem upset, and I think I can see why.
If you need to talk to me in confidence my email is rubbishaddress (AT) live.co.uk
81.149.250.228 ( talk) 16:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - May 2008 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by
ENewsBot ·
10:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
You had it on permanent redirect protection to Cherish (band) because of the lack of sources at the time. However, that was two months ago, and now it is less than a week until the album's release date (which is May 13). Since then, I found its listing on Amazon.com. It features the cover, release date, tracklisting, and has samples to verify it. So now, I request an unprotection of the redirect, please. Tom Danson ( talk) 07:15, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to see that you're away from Wikipedia, at least for the moment. I appreciated your encouragement with Verna's article. Cheers, Easchiff( talk) 21:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:All About Me.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 23:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Glacially, with a speed that makes the drift of continents seem like rapid transit, the wheels at the League of Copyeditors turn. I am reviewing this article. I see you are on a wiki-break. But when you return, drop a note on my talk page if you want to pitch it as a FAC again, and I will look at the copy again, just to ensure that it is tidy. Apologies for the delay, but LOCE is chronically understaffed. They've recently had a fresh infusion; I'm one of the new number. If I have any particular content questions, I'll pose them here, on the assumption that you will eventually return. Take care. Gosgood ( talk) 18:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:LIVINGtv2 logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:EastEnders - Julia's theme.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
It's a bit late — well, okay a year late — but I just want to say congratulations for getting Yes, Minister up to FA status. Your conduct during the extraordinarily long approval process was exemplary. I'd honestly never have the patience you exhibited. Therefore, I award you with the following:
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
for shepherding the article Yes, Minister on a long journey to FA status. Your calm, detailed communication with other editors during the process is an example of how the process should work. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 10:58, 25 August 2008 (UTC) |
This user vandalished yesterday that's wikipedia articles. Here His/Her Contributions. It would watch that guy and His/Her editions. They can lead us to the confusion. -- Ravave ( talk) 16:54, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 07:14, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Welcome back! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.189.161.123 ( talk) 09:32, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
The
August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
01:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Glad to see you back editing. I thought U had left as your name was all redded out, and I just noticed you edited an article on my watch list. So anyway, seeing as you were the very first editor who was nice to me here all the way back in 2006, i'm really pleased you didnt leave for good. You've done so much great work here, a shame it's never appreciated enough, but hope you know it's at least appreciated by some :) GunGagdin Moan 01:02, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:The Journal (North East England daily newspaper) logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 06:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Sunday Sun (North East England newspaper) logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 06:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Evening Chronicle (North East England daily newspaper) logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 06:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the reminder; I'll be over there shortly. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:37, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Joking Apart - Robert and Tracy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Joking apart - mark and becky.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:15, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Please see this question regarding one of your images. Dragons flight ( talk) 17:37, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Would it be asking too much for you to look the article over and give me some pointers on the problems you see with it passing as a GA or FA article? I get discouraged sometimes with nothing but negative edits —Kitchen roll is certainly an exception— on it mostly. Should let it pass, I know. I've worked it for too long to give up - even though I sometimes want to. If you could just give an honest assessment without getting involved (if you prefer that) you don't know how much I would appreciate it. Agadant ( talk) 20:56, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Carl Gottlieb.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Seidenstud ( talk) 05:10, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Only the other day I was thinking about nominating this article for GA. Looks like you beat me to it! Bradley0110 ( talk) 19:34, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
You are not my favourite person in the world, you know.
Even so, you have my limited support with your wikipedia edits.
I thought you would like some support! 217.39.5.54 ( talk) 00:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Please check reply at my talk page. thx Jurohi ( talk) 00:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
I am not civil. I agree. But when someone is going to add to an encyclopedia, then at least, they should use proper syntax and semantics. Most editors here can't spell. And English is only my SECOND language. When I see things like "I could of done that", it makes me cringe. And it happens too often here on Wikipedia. 97.103.81.29 ( talk) 16:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
As its stated goals, Wikipedia is about quality, not quantity. 97.103.81.29 ( talk) 16:47, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:IACBTMNphoto90.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:26, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
I don't like you one little bit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.131.56.52 ( talk) 20:19, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm not sure what you meant when you said that you can't accept copywrited material since I added none. I simply added a new category -- Category:Best Picture Academy Award Nominees -- and you removed it without a reason. Can you explain that please? Thank you. Bill shannon ( talk) 22:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
There needs to be a central place to discuss this and invite editors who have an issue. It came up on Shakespeare in Love, also. Regardless of what is written on the category page, it is redundant to put a film in the nominee and the winner categories. It also seems to me to be over-categorization. My view is that the winning supercedes the nomination. Perhaps consensus should be solicited on this. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 00:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:I'd Do Anything For Love - video screengrab.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle ( talk) 11:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:I'd Do Anything For Love - video screengrab.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:16, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi, JPS! There's a question here about an article you deleted. Do you think that article can be restored or is it better to write another properly? Maybe you could explain yourself. You seem to have a lot of non-fans btw ;) Chamal talk 17:53, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
I think that says it all really 86.173.139.210 ( talk) 20:15, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
If all four Jaws articles are GA, it'll be easy to squish them altogether if you want to bring it to GA too. I'm not sure how I can help really since I know nothing of the sequels. Alientraveller ( talk) 23:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
I have semi'd your user and talkpages temporarily owing to an outbreak of silliness there. Thanks, Black Kite 14:41, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
I think it would be more appropriate to up it to full protection for a content dispute. I know I could still edit it, but it avoids the image of one rule for editors, one for IPs. I would do it, but that would be a huge conflict of interest. What do you think? For the issue itself, I have solicited opinions from 3 wikiprojects. Regards, Woody ( talk) 15:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey. I've GA reviewed the Steven Moffat article, which you nominated. I highlighted a couple of things, which I've put on the review page. Feel free to contact me with any queries. Thanks - weebiloobil ( talk) 15:16, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
There were several problems with the One Foot in the Grave article. Character description was too long for the page so a new one was created for this. The plot summary went off the point and into an episode synopsis of the first episode; it was also full of opinions and Wikipeda articles are suppose to be neutral. The plot summary is designed to summarise the key points, so there’s no need for over-the-top detail. Thank you. Edito*Magica ( talk) 19:18, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Back to the point, the tags have been removed again so i'm going to reincorporate them into the article. Tags should not be removed until issues have been resolved. Wikipedia policy. Edito*Magica ( talk) 20:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
The style guide also states:
- "What is and is not included as "readable prose":
"Readable prose" is the main body of the text, excluding sections such as:
- Footnotes and reference sections ("see also", "external links", footnotes, bibliography, etc)
- Diagrams and images
- Tables and lists
- Wikilinks and external URLs
- Formatting and mark-up.
An article longer than one or two pages when printed should be divided into sections to ease navigation (see the Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Layout for guidance). For most long articles, division into sections is natural anyway; but even if there is no "natural" way to split a long list or table, many editors believe that it should be done to allow easier navigation and per-section editing.
Readers may tire of reading a page much longer than about 30 to 50 KB, which roughly corresponds to 6,000 to 10,000 words of readable prose. If an article is significantly longer than that, it may benefit the reader to move some sections to other articles and replace them with summaries (see Wikipedia:Summary style).
Edito*Magica ( talk) 20:47, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
An article longer than one or two pages when printed should be divided into sections to ease navigation' (see the Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Layout for guidance). For most long articles, division into sections is natural anyway; but even if there is no "natural" way to split a long list or table, many editors believe that it should be done to allow easier navigation and per-section editing.' Why are you so against sub-pages? Edito*Magica ( talk) 20:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
... Bohemian Rhapsody, an article which you have contributed extensively to, was nominated for FA (see this.) — Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 17:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() Archives |
---|
This sounds silly from one stranger to another stranger.
Since I made that stupid error about the picture I've been keeping track. You seem upset, and I think I can see why.
If you need to talk to me in confidence my email is rubbishaddress (AT) live.co.uk
81.149.250.228 ( talk) 16:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - May 2008 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by
ENewsBot ·
10:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
You had it on permanent redirect protection to Cherish (band) because of the lack of sources at the time. However, that was two months ago, and now it is less than a week until the album's release date (which is May 13). Since then, I found its listing on Amazon.com. It features the cover, release date, tracklisting, and has samples to verify it. So now, I request an unprotection of the redirect, please. Tom Danson ( talk) 07:15, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to see that you're away from Wikipedia, at least for the moment. I appreciated your encouragement with Verna's article. Cheers, Easchiff( talk) 21:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:All About Me.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 23:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Glacially, with a speed that makes the drift of continents seem like rapid transit, the wheels at the League of Copyeditors turn. I am reviewing this article. I see you are on a wiki-break. But when you return, drop a note on my talk page if you want to pitch it as a FAC again, and I will look at the copy again, just to ensure that it is tidy. Apologies for the delay, but LOCE is chronically understaffed. They've recently had a fresh infusion; I'm one of the new number. If I have any particular content questions, I'll pose them here, on the assumption that you will eventually return. Take care. Gosgood ( talk) 18:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:LIVINGtv2 logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:EastEnders - Julia's theme.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
It's a bit late — well, okay a year late — but I just want to say congratulations for getting Yes, Minister up to FA status. Your conduct during the extraordinarily long approval process was exemplary. I'd honestly never have the patience you exhibited. Therefore, I award you with the following:
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
for shepherding the article Yes, Minister on a long journey to FA status. Your calm, detailed communication with other editors during the process is an example of how the process should work. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 10:58, 25 August 2008 (UTC) |
This user vandalished yesterday that's wikipedia articles. Here His/Her Contributions. It would watch that guy and His/Her editions. They can lead us to the confusion. -- Ravave ( talk) 16:54, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 07:14, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Welcome back! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.189.161.123 ( talk) 09:32, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
The
August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
01:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Glad to see you back editing. I thought U had left as your name was all redded out, and I just noticed you edited an article on my watch list. So anyway, seeing as you were the very first editor who was nice to me here all the way back in 2006, i'm really pleased you didnt leave for good. You've done so much great work here, a shame it's never appreciated enough, but hope you know it's at least appreciated by some :) GunGagdin Moan 01:02, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:The Journal (North East England daily newspaper) logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 06:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Sunday Sun (North East England newspaper) logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 06:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Evening Chronicle (North East England daily newspaper) logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 06:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the reminder; I'll be over there shortly. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:37, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Joking Apart - Robert and Tracy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Joking apart - mark and becky.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:15, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Please see this question regarding one of your images. Dragons flight ( talk) 17:37, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Would it be asking too much for you to look the article over and give me some pointers on the problems you see with it passing as a GA or FA article? I get discouraged sometimes with nothing but negative edits —Kitchen roll is certainly an exception— on it mostly. Should let it pass, I know. I've worked it for too long to give up - even though I sometimes want to. If you could just give an honest assessment without getting involved (if you prefer that) you don't know how much I would appreciate it. Agadant ( talk) 20:56, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Carl Gottlieb.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Seidenstud ( talk) 05:10, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Only the other day I was thinking about nominating this article for GA. Looks like you beat me to it! Bradley0110 ( talk) 19:34, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
You are not my favourite person in the world, you know.
Even so, you have my limited support with your wikipedia edits.
I thought you would like some support! 217.39.5.54 ( talk) 00:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Please check reply at my talk page. thx Jurohi ( talk) 00:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
I am not civil. I agree. But when someone is going to add to an encyclopedia, then at least, they should use proper syntax and semantics. Most editors here can't spell. And English is only my SECOND language. When I see things like "I could of done that", it makes me cringe. And it happens too often here on Wikipedia. 97.103.81.29 ( talk) 16:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
As its stated goals, Wikipedia is about quality, not quantity. 97.103.81.29 ( talk) 16:47, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:IACBTMNphoto90.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:26, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
I don't like you one little bit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.131.56.52 ( talk) 20:19, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm not sure what you meant when you said that you can't accept copywrited material since I added none. I simply added a new category -- Category:Best Picture Academy Award Nominees -- and you removed it without a reason. Can you explain that please? Thank you. Bill shannon ( talk) 22:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
There needs to be a central place to discuss this and invite editors who have an issue. It came up on Shakespeare in Love, also. Regardless of what is written on the category page, it is redundant to put a film in the nominee and the winner categories. It also seems to me to be over-categorization. My view is that the winning supercedes the nomination. Perhaps consensus should be solicited on this. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 00:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:I'd Do Anything For Love - video screengrab.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle ( talk) 11:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:I'd Do Anything For Love - video screengrab.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:16, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi, JPS! There's a question here about an article you deleted. Do you think that article can be restored or is it better to write another properly? Maybe you could explain yourself. You seem to have a lot of non-fans btw ;) Chamal talk 17:53, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
I think that says it all really 86.173.139.210 ( talk) 20:15, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
If all four Jaws articles are GA, it'll be easy to squish them altogether if you want to bring it to GA too. I'm not sure how I can help really since I know nothing of the sequels. Alientraveller ( talk) 23:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
I have semi'd your user and talkpages temporarily owing to an outbreak of silliness there. Thanks, Black Kite 14:41, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
I think it would be more appropriate to up it to full protection for a content dispute. I know I could still edit it, but it avoids the image of one rule for editors, one for IPs. I would do it, but that would be a huge conflict of interest. What do you think? For the issue itself, I have solicited opinions from 3 wikiprojects. Regards, Woody ( talk) 15:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey. I've GA reviewed the Steven Moffat article, which you nominated. I highlighted a couple of things, which I've put on the review page. Feel free to contact me with any queries. Thanks - weebiloobil ( talk) 15:16, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
There were several problems with the One Foot in the Grave article. Character description was too long for the page so a new one was created for this. The plot summary went off the point and into an episode synopsis of the first episode; it was also full of opinions and Wikipeda articles are suppose to be neutral. The plot summary is designed to summarise the key points, so there’s no need for over-the-top detail. Thank you. Edito*Magica ( talk) 19:18, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Back to the point, the tags have been removed again so i'm going to reincorporate them into the article. Tags should not be removed until issues have been resolved. Wikipedia policy. Edito*Magica ( talk) 20:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
The style guide also states:
- "What is and is not included as "readable prose":
"Readable prose" is the main body of the text, excluding sections such as:
- Footnotes and reference sections ("see also", "external links", footnotes, bibliography, etc)
- Diagrams and images
- Tables and lists
- Wikilinks and external URLs
- Formatting and mark-up.
An article longer than one or two pages when printed should be divided into sections to ease navigation (see the Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Layout for guidance). For most long articles, division into sections is natural anyway; but even if there is no "natural" way to split a long list or table, many editors believe that it should be done to allow easier navigation and per-section editing.
Readers may tire of reading a page much longer than about 30 to 50 KB, which roughly corresponds to 6,000 to 10,000 words of readable prose. If an article is significantly longer than that, it may benefit the reader to move some sections to other articles and replace them with summaries (see Wikipedia:Summary style).
Edito*Magica ( talk) 20:47, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
An article longer than one or two pages when printed should be divided into sections to ease navigation' (see the Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Layout for guidance). For most long articles, division into sections is natural anyway; but even if there is no "natural" way to split a long list or table, many editors believe that it should be done to allow easier navigation and per-section editing.' Why are you so against sub-pages? Edito*Magica ( talk) 20:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
... Bohemian Rhapsody, an article which you have contributed extensively to, was nominated for FA (see this.) — Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 17:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)