Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
22:02, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vexillum strictecostatum. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{ helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Vexillum strictecostatum was changed by TheWizardofSchnoz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.978627 on 2012-01-23T22:07:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 22:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to
McPherson, Kansas with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Jim1138 (
talk)
22:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. --
Gogo Dodo (
talk)
21:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
22:02, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vexillum strictecostatum. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{ helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Vexillum strictecostatum was changed by TheWizardofSchnoz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.978627 on 2012-01-23T22:07:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 22:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to
McPherson, Kansas with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Jim1138 (
talk)
22:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. --
Gogo Dodo (
talk)
21:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)