|
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Len Bias, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{
helpme}}
" on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Len Bias page. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. -- Yankees76 Talk 14:08, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Torreslfchero. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Partnership, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks,
Torreslfchero (
talk)
15:55, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Limited liability company with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Torreslfchero (
talk)
15:57, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Limited liability company with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Torreslfchero (
talk)
15:58, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Waterford Commons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterford Commons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JJ Be rs 17:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
|
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Len Bias, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{
helpme}}
" on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Len Bias page. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. -- Yankees76 Talk 14:08, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Torreslfchero. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Partnership, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks,
Torreslfchero (
talk)
15:55, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Limited liability company with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Torreslfchero (
talk)
15:57, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Limited liability company with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Torreslfchero (
talk)
15:58, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Waterford Commons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterford Commons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JJ Be rs 17:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)