Hello, TheDarkPoison, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Myxomatosis57 (
talk)
16:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to
Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent
genre changes, such as the one you made to
Infestissumam, have conflicted with our
neutral point of view and
verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide
reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek
consensus for certain edits. Thank you.
Myxomatosis57 (
talk)
16:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from changing
genres, as you did to
Asking Alexandria, without providing a
source and without establishing a
consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own
point of view are considered
disruptive. Thank you.
Lukeno94
(tell Luke off here)
12:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Mudvayne have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Materialscientist (
talk)
12:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Asking Alexandria show more post hardcore traits than heavy metal traits. Factual correctionsshould not be considered disruptive.
I assume that your knowledge about Wikipedia policies are minimal. Let me explain to you; we have this policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Based on this policy, we're supposed to source every statement that we include in the articles, like how we are supposed to cite other sources with the proper format ( MLA, APA, etc.) in academic life. The sources should be credible third party sources. The statements which should be sourced include the music genres; if one person decides to alter the genres perpetually without proper explanation or consensus, we call him/her a genre warrior.
To sum up, do not make genre changes based solely on your own opinion. Your opinions are not credible enough to be cited in the articles, especially when there are proper sources that contradict your claim. You are probably not a music expert also; neither I am. Personally, I'm just trying to do what Wikipedia asserts me to do: adding sourced statements. Both stoner rock and doom metal genres are sourced; if you are offended by it, just start a talk page discussion instead of accusing other editors with ignorance and try to actually improve the article's content. Or you can just try to find sources that say that the band is not stoner rock etc.
Please do not make malicious edits based on your sole personal opinion unless you have a deep understanding about the actual Wikipedia policies. Thank you. Myxomatosis57 ( talk) 16:56, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Helmet (band) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:01, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, TheDarkPoison, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Myxomatosis57 (
talk)
16:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to
Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent
genre changes, such as the one you made to
Infestissumam, have conflicted with our
neutral point of view and
verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide
reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek
consensus for certain edits. Thank you.
Myxomatosis57 (
talk)
16:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from changing
genres, as you did to
Asking Alexandria, without providing a
source and without establishing a
consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own
point of view are considered
disruptive. Thank you.
Lukeno94
(tell Luke off here)
12:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Mudvayne have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Materialscientist (
talk)
12:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Asking Alexandria show more post hardcore traits than heavy metal traits. Factual correctionsshould not be considered disruptive.
I assume that your knowledge about Wikipedia policies are minimal. Let me explain to you; we have this policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Based on this policy, we're supposed to source every statement that we include in the articles, like how we are supposed to cite other sources with the proper format ( MLA, APA, etc.) in academic life. The sources should be credible third party sources. The statements which should be sourced include the music genres; if one person decides to alter the genres perpetually without proper explanation or consensus, we call him/her a genre warrior.
To sum up, do not make genre changes based solely on your own opinion. Your opinions are not credible enough to be cited in the articles, especially when there are proper sources that contradict your claim. You are probably not a music expert also; neither I am. Personally, I'm just trying to do what Wikipedia asserts me to do: adding sourced statements. Both stoner rock and doom metal genres are sourced; if you are offended by it, just start a talk page discussion instead of accusing other editors with ignorance and try to actually improve the article's content. Or you can just try to find sources that say that the band is not stoner rock etc.
Please do not make malicious edits based on your sole personal opinion unless you have a deep understanding about the actual Wikipedia policies. Thank you. Myxomatosis57 ( talk) 16:56, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Helmet (band) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:01, 6 December 2013 (UTC)